Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9610045

On the EPR Phenomenon

Sakaguchi, Toshifumi

Published Oct 30, 1996• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The origin of the nonlocal nature of quantum mechanics is investigated in the context of Everett's formulation of quantum mechanics. EPR phenomenon can fully be explained without introducing any kind of decoherence.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9610045

Related papers

A Solution to the Einstein’s EPR Puzzle in the Modified Quantum Mechanics

Jiří Souček

In this note we show that in the modified quantum mechanics EPR correlations can be explained locally. We show also that the claim on the quantum nonlocality is in the modified quantum mechanics false.

•Aug 1, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement - Can Reality Really be this Weird?

Allan Goff

*Special Relativity places severe constraints on any possibility for faster-than-light (FTL) phenomenon. There are four hopes for FTL; warp drive via General Relativity Theory (GRT), wormholes via GRT, tachyons, and quantum mechanics. This talk focuses on why quantum mechanics makes the list. The nonlocal nature of matter demonstrates correlations between distant events that cannot be explained by current concepts of causality. For two classical events to be correlated, either one causes the other, or both possess a common cause in their past light cones. Neither kind of causality can explain the correlations observed in entangled quantum systems. Reality seems to support a third mysterious type of causality, with an essential spacelike nature, but direct spacelike causality should be impossible as it would lead to temporal paradox. The two concepts of classical causality, timelike causes and common cause, are presented along with a review of the EPR experiment showing that something like spacelike causality exists between the distant parts of an entangled quantum system. Bell’s Inequality shows that the EPR correlations cannot be attributed to common causes. Gisin’s EPR-Relativity experiment shows that timelike causes cannot explain the EPR correlations either. The metaphor of Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe is used to show a third type of causality applicable only to quantum situations. This third type of causality is an indirect spacelike cause acting through multiple classical realities, permitting FTL but prohibiting temporal paradox. I. Introduction HIS paper considers the issue of causality in entangled quantum systems. The Background section reviews the two classical notions of causality, EPR type entanglements, and Special Relativity. The Common Cause section reviews Bell’s Inequality theorem and shows how this type of causality cannot explain the correlations seen in entangled systems. The Einsteinian Causality section reviews Gisin’s experiment demonstrating that time-like causality cannot explain these correlations either. Gisin’s conclusion is that quantum systems support a new mysterious 3 rd type of causality. The Quantum Causality section introduces a situation in Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe that exhibits this same kind of causality

AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit (JPC)•Jul 9, 2006•0 citations

EPR-Bell-Schrödinger Proof of Nonlocality Using Position and Momentum

Jean Bricmont, Sheldon Goldstein, Douglas Hemmick

arXiv:1906.06687•Fundamental theories of physics•Oct 2, 2020•5 citations

A Temporal Interpretation of Quantum Measurement (Revised and Clarified Formulation)

Roberto Carlos Moleirinho Batista

Abstract This article presents a revised and conceptually refined formulation of a previously proposed Temporal Interpretation of quantum measurement, explicitly addressing the physical nature of wavefunction collapse. While the original proposal emphasised relativistic aspects of momentum superpositions, the present work clarifies the interpretation within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics, without introducing new dynamics or experimental predictions. Unitary evolution is read as a process of differentiated phase accumulation between branches of a quantum state. In relativistic contexts, phase differentials can be structurally related to effective proper-time differentials, allowing the introduction of a notion of temporal compatibility that provides a physically grounded account of decoherence. When such differentials exceed a characteristic scale, interference between branches becomes operationally inaccessible, while global unitarity is preserved. The observer is treated as a physical system endowed with an irreversible proper time associated with macroscopic, entropic dynamics. Within this framework, collapse is explained as an emergent physical phenomenon arising from the irreversibility of the observer’s proper time, which prevents the reconstruction of phase coherence after an interaction. Collapse is therefore neither a fundamental dynamical mechanism nor an objective event in space-time, but a necessary consequence of temporal irreversibility in physical observers. This formulation sharpens the distinction between decoherence and collapse, preserves full consistency with the Born rule, and positions the Temporal Interpretation as a competing interpretative framework that provides a concrete physical explanation for the quantum–classical transition, improving and clarifying the original proposal. This version clarifies the operational status of the interaction time, refines Sections 5.3 and 5.4, and standardises references and editorial structure. No changes to the formalism or conclusions.

•Dec 26, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Nonlocality - The EPR Argument Reconsidered

G. C. Ghirardi, Renata Grassi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

Resolving the EPR–Bell Paradox via Observer-Relative Information

Greco, Giuseppe Junior

The EPR–Bell paradox is widely interpreted as evidence that nature itself is nonlocal, suggesting instantaneous physical influence between spacelike separated measurements. This paper proposes an Observer-First Interpretation (OFI), in which quantum states are treated as observer-relative informational constructs constrained by evidence accessibility and causal boundaries. Within this framework, Bell correlations do not imply physical superluminal influence, but arise from conditional informational state updates when observers later compare records. Nonlocality is thus reinterpreted as an informational phenomenon rather than a physical one. The approach preserves relativistic causality, reproduces all standard quantum predictions, and resolves the EPR–Bell paradox without introducing hidden variables or modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics.

•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations
*Special Relativity places severe constraints on any possibility for faster-than-light (FTL) phenomenon. There are four hopes for FTL; warp drive via General Relativity Theory (GRT), wormholes via GRT, tachyons, and quantum mechanics. This talk focuses on why quantum mechanics makes the list. The nonlocal nature of matter demonstrates correlations between distant events that cannot be explained by current concepts of causality. For two classical events to be correlated, either one causes the other, or both possess a common cause in their past light cones. Neither kind of causality can explain the correlations observed in entangled quantum systems. Reality seems to support a third mysterious type of causality, with an essential spacelike nature, but direct spacelike causality should be impossible as it would lead to temporal paradox. The two concepts of classical causality, timelike causes and common cause, are presented along with a review of the EPR experiment showing that something like spacelike causality exists between the distant parts of an entangled quantum system. Bell’s Inequality shows that the EPR correlations cannot be attributed to common causes. Gisin’s EPR-Relativity experiment shows that timelike causes cannot explain the EPR correlations either. The metaphor of Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe is used to show a third type of causality applicable only to quantum situations. This third type of causality is an indirect spacelike cause acting through multiple classical realities, permitting FTL but prohibiting temporal paradox. I. Introduction HIS paper considers the issue of causality in entangled quantum systems. The Background section reviews the two classical notions of causality, EPR type entanglements, and Special Relativity. The Common Cause section reviews Bell’s Inequality theorem and shows how this type of causality cannot explain the correlations seen in entangled systems. The Einsteinian Causality section reviews Gisin’s experiment demonstrating that time-like causality cannot explain these correlations either. Gisin’s conclusion is that quantum systems support a new mysterious 3 rd type of causality. The Quantum Causality section introduces a situation in Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe that exhibits this same kind of causality
Abstract This article presents a revised and conceptually refined formulation of a previously proposed Temporal Interpretation of quantum measurement, explicitly addressing the physical nature of wavefunction collapse. While the original proposal emphasised relativistic aspects of momentum superpositions, the present work clarifies the interpretation within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics, without introducing new dynamics or experimental predictions. Unitary evolution is read as a process of differentiated phase accumulation between branches of a quantum state. In relativistic contexts, phase differentials can be structurally related to effective proper-time differentials, allowing the introduction of a notion of temporal compatibility that provides a physically grounded account of decoherence. When such differentials exceed a characteristic scale, interference between branches becomes operationally inaccessible, while global unitarity is preserved. The observer is treated as a physical system endowed with an irreversible proper time associated with macroscopic, entropic dynamics. Within this framework, collapse is explained as an emergent physical phenomenon arising from the irreversibility of the observer’s proper time, which prevents the reconstruction of phase coherence after an interaction. Collapse is therefore neither a fundamental dynamical mechanism nor an objective event in space-time, but a necessary consequence of temporal irreversibility in physical observers. This formulation sharpens the distinction between decoherence and collapse, preserves full consistency with the Born rule, and positions the Temporal Interpretation as a competing interpretative framework that provides a concrete physical explanation for the quantum–classical transition, improving and clarifying the original proposal. This version clarifies the operational status of the interaction time, refines Sections 5.3 and 5.4, and standardises references and editorial structure. No changes to the formalism or conclusions.
The EPR–Bell paradox is widely interpreted as evidence that nature itself is nonlocal, suggesting instantaneous physical influence between spacelike separated measurements. This paper proposes an Observer-First Interpretation (OFI), in which quantum states are treated as observer-relative informational constructs constrained by evidence accessibility and causal boundaries. Within this framework, Bell correlations do not imply physical superluminal influence, but arise from conditional informational state updates when observers later compare records. Nonlocality is thus reinterpreted as an informational phenomenon rather than a physical one. The approach preserves relativistic causality, reproduces all standard quantum predictions, and resolves the EPR–Bell paradox without introducing hidden variables or modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics.