Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9604006

Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Need Not Completely Reveal the Error Syndrome

Peter W. Shor, John A. Smolin

Published Apr 8, 1996• 71 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum error-correcting codes so far proposed have not worked in the presence of noise which introduces more than one bit of entropy per qubit sent through a quantum channel, nor can any code which identifies the complete error syndrome. We describe a code which does not find the complete error syndrome and can be used for reliable transmission of quantum information through channels which add more than one bit of entropy per transmitted bit. In the case of the depolarizing channel our code can be used in a channel of fidelity .8096. The best existing code worked only down to .8107.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9604006

Related papers

Entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes

Todd A. Brun, Min-Hsiu Hsieh

Introduction Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) have turned out to have many applications; but their primary purpose, of course, is to protect quantum information from noise. This need manifests itself in two rather different situations. The first is in quantum computing. The qubits in a quantum computer are subject to noise due both to imprecision in the operations (or gates) and to interactions with the external environment. They undergo errors when they are acted upon, and when they are just being stored (though hopefully not at the same rate). All the qubits in the computer must be kept error-free long enough for the computation to be completed. This is the principle of fault tolerance. A rather different situation occurs in quantum communication . Here, the sender and receiver (Alice and Bob) are assumed to be physically separated, and the qubits travel from the sender to the receiver over a (presumably noisy) channel. This channel is assumed to be the dominant source of errors. While the qubits may undergo processing before and after transmission, errors during this processing are considered negligible compared to the channel errors. This picture of transmission through a channel is similar in spirit to the paradigm underlying much of classical information theory.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 5, 2013•3 citations

Quantum Secret Sharing with Error Correction

Aziz Mouzali, Fatiha Merazka, Damian Markham

We investigate in this work a quantum error correction on a five-qubits graph state used for secret sharing through five noisy channels. We describe the procedure for the five, seven and nine qubits codes. It is known that the three codes always allow error recovery if only one among the sent qubits is disturbed in the transmitting channel. However, if two qubits and more are disturbed, then the correction will depend on the used code. We compare in this paper the three codes by computing the average fidelity between the sent secret and that measured by the receivers. We will treat the case where, at most, two qubits are affected in each one of five depolarizing channels.

arXiv:1409.3620•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 2012•13 citations

Quantum Error Source and Channel Coding

Dennis G. Lucarelli

Quantum error correction draws many of its principles and constructions from classical coding theory, adapted to the unique aspects of quantum mechanics. Here we extend this correspondence to a block of logical qubits, each prepared in the same quantum code, by coupling the block through a classical error correcting code: syndrome qubits then carry error information from several logical qubits at once, and collective inference recovers the errors. Algebraically, the construction defines subgroups of the product stabilizer group corresponding to duals of classical codes, and we prove that a lookup table decoder corrects every error pattern respecting the correction radii of the two constituent codes. For classical algebraic code families, the number of syndrome qubits serving $L$ logical qubits scales as ${\cal O}(\log_2(L+1))$ at the code-capacity level, though at the price of stabilizer weight growing with the block length. An entropy bound shows that check weights need not grow with $L$. Under a phenomenological noise model, the same lookup table identifies measurement errors by nearest-neighbor post-processing, and classical algebraic decoders locate exactly the logical qubits carrying errors even with noisy syndromes. More broadly, we argue that quantum error correction, reduced to its functional core, is source compression in the sense of Shannon, whose source and channel coding theorems bound the overhead rates of quantum post-selection tasks.

arXiv:2004.09479•Apr 20, 2020•0 citations

Unitary Application of the Quantum Error Correction Codes

游波, 许可, 吴小华

For applying the perfect code to transmit quantum information over a noise channel,the standard protocol contains four steps:the encoding,the noise channel,the error-correction operation,and the decoding.In present work,we show that this protocol can be simplified.The error-correction operation is not necessary if the decoding is realized by the so-called complete unitary transformation.We also offer a quantum circuit,which can correct the arbitrary single-qubit errors.

理论物理通讯：英文版•Sep 15, 2012•0 citations

Unitary Application of the Quantum Error Correction Codes

Bo You, Ke Xu, Xiaohua Wu

For applying the perfect code to transmit quantum information over a noise channel, the standard protocol contains four steps: the encoding, the noise channel, the error-correction operation, and the decoding. In present work, we show that this protocol can be simplified. The error-correction operation is not necessary if the decoding is realized by the so-called complete unitary transformation. We also offer a quantum circuit, which can correct the arbitrary single-qubit errors.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Sep 1, 2012•4 citations

Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction

Charles H. Bennett, David Peter Divincenzo, John A. Smolin +1 more

Entanglement purification protocols (EPPs) and quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) provide two ways of protecting quantum states from interaction with the environment. In an EPP, perfectly entangled pure states are extracted, with some yield D, from a mixed state M shared by two parties; with a QECC, an arbitrary quantum state |\ensuremath{\xi}〉 can be transmitted at some rate Q through a noisy channel \ensuremath{\chi} without degradation. We prove that an EPP involving one-way classical communication and acting on mixed state M^(\ensuremath{\chi}) (obtained by sharing halves of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs through a channel \ensuremath{\chi}) yields a QECC on \ensuremath{\chi} with rate Q=D, and vice versa. We compare the amount of entanglement E(M) required to prepare a mixed state M by local actions with the amounts ${\mathit{D}}_{1}$(M) and ${\mathit{D}}_{2}$(M) that can be locally distilled from it by EPPs using one- and two-way classical communication, respectively, and give an exact expression for E(M) when M is Bell diagonal. While EPPs require classical communication, QECCs do not, and we prove Q is not increased by adding one-way classical communication. However, both D and Q can be increased by adding two-way communication. We show that certain noisy quantum channels, for example a 50% depolarizing channel, can be used for reliable transmission of quantum states if two-way communication is available, but cannot be used if only one-way communication is available. We exhibit a family of codes based on universal hashing able to achieve an asymptotic Q (or D) of 1-S for simple noise models, where S is the error entropy. We also obtain a specific, simple 5-bit single-error-correcting quantum block code. We prove that iff a QECC results in high fidelity for the case of no error then the QECC can be recast into a form where the encoder is the matrix inverse of the decoder. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:quant-ph/9604024•Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1996•5,272 citations
Quantum error-correcting codes so far proposed have not worked in the presence of noise which introduces more than one bit of entropy per qubit sent through a quantum channel, nor can any code which identifies the complete error syndrome. We describe a code which does not find the complete error syndrome and can be used for reliable transmission of quantum information through channels which add more than one bit of entropy per transmitted bit. In the case of the depolarizing channel our code can be used in a channel of fidelity .8096. The best existing code worked only down to .8107.
Introduction Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) have turned out to have many applications; but their primary purpose, of course, is to protect quantum information from noise. This need manifests itself in two rather different situations. The first is in quantum computing. The qubits in a quantum computer are subject to noise due both to imprecision in the operations (or gates) and to interactions with the external environment. They undergo errors when they are acted upon, and when they are just being stored (though hopefully not at the same rate). All the qubits in the computer must be kept error-free long enough for the computation to be completed. This is the principle of fault tolerance. A rather different situation occurs in quantum communication . Here, the sender and receiver (Alice and Bob) are assumed to be physically separated, and the qubits travel from the sender to the receiver over a (presumably noisy) channel. This channel is assumed to be the dominant source of errors. While the qubits may undergo processing before and after transmission, errors during this processing are considered negligible compared to the channel errors. This picture of transmission through a channel is similar in spirit to the paradigm underlying much of classical information theory.
We investigate in this work a quantum error correction on a five-qubits graph state used for secret sharing through five noisy channels. We describe the procedure for the five, seven and nine qubits codes. It is known that the three codes always allow error recovery if only one among the sent qubits is disturbed in the transmitting channel. However, if two qubits and more are disturbed, then the correction will depend on the used code. We compare in this paper the three codes by computing the average fidelity between the sent secret and that measured by the receivers. We will treat the case where, at most, two qubits are affected in each one of five depolarizing channels.
Quantum error correction draws many of its principles and constructions from classical coding theory, adapted to the unique aspects of quantum mechanics. Here we extend this correspondence to a block of logical qubits, each prepared in the same quantum code, by coupling the block through a classical error correcting code: syndrome qubits then carry error information from several logical qubits at once, and collective inference recovers the errors. Algebraically, the construction defines subgroups of the product stabilizer group corresponding to duals of classical codes, and we prove that a lookup table decoder corrects every error pattern respecting the correction radii of the two constituent codes. For classical algebraic code families, the number of syndrome qubits serving LLL logical qubits scales as O(log⁡2(L+1)){\cal O}(\log_2(L+1))O(log2​(L+1)) at the code-capacity level, though at the price of stabilizer weight growing with the block length. An entropy bound shows that check weights need not grow with LLL. Under a phenomenological noise model, the same lookup table identifies measurement errors by nearest-neighbor post-processing, and classical algebraic decoders locate exactly the logical qubits carrying errors even with noisy syndromes. More broadly, we argue that quantum error correction, reduced to its functional core, is source compression in the sense of Shannon, whose source and channel coding theorems bound the overhead rates of quantum post-selection tasks.
Entanglement purification protocols (EPPs) and quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) provide two ways of protecting quantum states from interaction with the environment. In an EPP, perfectly entangled pure states are extracted, with some yield D, from a mixed state M shared by two parties; with a QECC, an arbitrary quantum state |\ensuremath{\xi}〉 can be transmitted at some rate Q through a noisy channel \ensuremath{\chi} without degradation. We prove that an EPP involving one-way classical communication and acting on mixed state M^(\ensuremath{\chi}) (obtained by sharing halves of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs through a channel \ensuremath{\chi}) yields a QECC on \ensuremath{\chi} with rate Q=D, and vice versa. We compare the amount of entanglement E(M) required to prepare a mixed state M by local actions with the amounts D1{\mathit{D}}_{1}D1​(M) and D2{\mathit{D}}_{2}D2​(M) that can be locally distilled from it by EPPs using one- and two-way classical communication, respectively, and give an exact expression for E(M) when M is Bell diagonal. While EPPs require classical communication, QECCs do not, and we prove Q is not increased by adding one-way classical communication. However, both D and Q can be increased by adding two-way communication. We show that certain noisy quantum channels, for example a 50% depolarizing channel, can be used for reliable transmission of quantum states if two-way communication is available, but cannot be used if only one-way communication is available. We exhibit a family of codes based on universal hashing able to achieve an asymptotic Q (or D) of 1-S for simple noise models, where S is the error entropy. We also obtain a specific, simple 5-bit single-error-correcting quantum block code. We prove that iff a QECC results in high fidelity for the case of no error then the QECC can be recast into a form where the encoder is the matrix inverse of the decoder. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.