Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9603006

Quantum Interferometry: Some Basic Features Revisited

M. Simonius

Published Mar 6, 1996• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The reduction paradigm of quantum interferometry is reanalyzed. In contrast to widespread opinion it is shown to be amenable to straightforward mathematical treatment within ``every-users'' simple-minded single particle quantum mechanics (without reduction postulate or the like), exploiting only its probabilistic content.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9603006

Related papers

Quantum Interferometry, Measurement and Objectivity: Some Basic Features Revisited

M. Simonius

arXiv:quant-ph/9701036•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

Consistent Interpretation of Quantum and Classical Mechanics

Andrew Das Arulsamy

Interpreting quantum mechanics is a hard problem basically because it means explaining why and how the mathematics exploited to formulate wave-particle duality are related to observations or reality in classical physics. Consequently, interpretation of quantum mechanics and its formalism should involve proper physical mathematics, physical logic and classical physics, which is not the case from the Copenhagen interpretation. Here, we shall revisit all the postulates of quantum mechanics with proper physics and physical logic and reconstruct them to establish the less-complex interpretation of quantum mechanics with additional new postulates from classical physics. A new quantum mechanical postulate (Postulate 9) is also introduced to understand the meaning of the forbidden gap between discrete energy levels and/or electron orbitals in atoms that is valid for molecules and condensed matter based on quantum mechanics that is technically well-defined and experimentally observable. Here, we tackle all the problems arise from the Copenhagen interpretation systematically by revising and/or extending them with proper classical and quantum physics without violating established experiments and without proposing ideas that violate physical reality.

•May 2, 2023•0 citations

Decoherence and reduction

Roland L. Omnes

A reduction mechanism resulting directly from the basic principles of quantum mechanics is proposed, inseparably from decoherence. A rather consistent theory of this effect is given and the next problems it raises are indicated.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604130•Apr 18, 2006•1 citation

Measurement in Quantum Mechanics: From Probabilities to Objective Events

M. Simonius

The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is reanalyzed within a general, strictly probabilistic framework (without reduction postulate). Based on a novel comprehensive definition of measurement the natural emergence of objective events is demonstrated and their formal representation within quantum mechanics is obtained. In order to be objective an event is required to be observable or readable in at least two independent, mutually non-interfering ways with necessarily agreeing results. Consistency in spite of unrestricted validity of reversibility of the evolution or the superposition principle is demonstrated and the role played by state reduction, in a properly defined restricted sense, is discussed. Some general consequences are pointed out.

arXiv:quant-ph/9811074•Jan 17, 1994•0 citations

REDUCTION PROCEDURES IN CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

José F. Cariñena, Jesús Clemente-Gallardo, Giuseppe Marmo

We present, in a pedagogical style, many instances of reduction procedures appearing in a variety of physical situations, both classical and quantum. We concentrate on the essential aspects of any reduction procedure, both in the algebraic and geometrical setting, elucidating the analogies and the differences between the classical and the quantum situations.

•Jan 1, 2007•11 citations

Basic postulates and mathematical tools

Chun‐Lei Tang

Basic scientific theories usually start with a set of hypotheses or “postulates.” There is generally no logical reason, apart from internal consistency, that can be given to justify such postulates absolutely. They come from ‘revelations’ in the minds of ‘geniuses,’ most likely with hints from Nature based on extensive careful observations. Their general validity can only be established through experimental verification. If numerous rigorously derived logical consequences of a very small set of postulates all agree with experimental observations without exception, one is inclined to accept these postulates as correct descriptions of the laws of Nature and use them confidently to explain and predict other natural phenomena. Quantum mechanics is no exception. It is based on a few postulates. For the purpose of the present discussion, we begin with three basic postulates involving: the “state functions,” “operators,” and “equations of motion.” In this chapter, this set of basic postulates and some of the corollaries and related definitions of terms are introduced and discussed. We will first simply state these postulates and introduce some of the related mathematical tools and concepts that are needed to arrive at their logical consequences later. To those who have not been exposed to the subject of quantum mechanics before, each of these postulates taken by itself may appear puzzling and meaningless at first. It should be borne in mind, however, that it is the collection of these postulates as a whole that forms the foundations of quantum mechanics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 23, 2005•0 citations
Interpreting quantum mechanics is a hard problem basically because it means explaining why and how the mathematics exploited to formulate wave-particle duality are related to observations or reality in classical physics. Consequently, interpretation of quantum mechanics and its formalism should involve proper physical mathematics, physical logic and classical physics, which is not the case from the Copenhagen interpretation. Here, we shall revisit all the postulates of quantum mechanics with proper physics and physical logic and reconstruct them to establish the less-complex interpretation of quantum mechanics with additional new postulates from classical physics. A new quantum mechanical postulate (Postulate 9) is also introduced to understand the meaning of the forbidden gap between discrete energy levels and/or electron orbitals in atoms that is valid for molecules and condensed matter based on quantum mechanics that is technically well-defined and experimentally observable. Here, we tackle all the problems arise from the Copenhagen interpretation systematically by revising and/or extending them with proper classical and quantum physics without violating established experiments and without proposing ideas that violate physical reality.
The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is reanalyzed within a general, strictly probabilistic framework (without reduction postulate). Based on a novel comprehensive definition of measurement the natural emergence of objective events is demonstrated and their formal representation within quantum mechanics is obtained. In order to be objective an event is required to be observable or readable in at least two independent, mutually non-interfering ways with necessarily agreeing results. Consistency in spite of unrestricted validity of reversibility of the evolution or the superposition principle is demonstrated and the role played by state reduction, in a properly defined restricted sense, is discussed. Some general consequences are pointed out.
Basic scientific theories usually start with a set of hypotheses or “postulates.” There is generally no logical reason, apart from internal consistency, that can be given to justify such postulates absolutely. They come from ‘revelations’ in the minds of ‘geniuses,’ most likely with hints from Nature based on extensive careful observations. Their general validity can only be established through experimental verification. If numerous rigorously derived logical consequences of a very small set of postulates all agree with experimental observations without exception, one is inclined to accept these postulates as correct descriptions of the laws of Nature and use them confidently to explain and predict other natural phenomena. Quantum mechanics is no exception. It is based on a few postulates. For the purpose of the present discussion, we begin with three basic postulates involving: the “state functions,” “operators,” and “equations of motion.” In this chapter, this set of basic postulates and some of the corollaries and related definitions of terms are introduced and discussed. We will first simply state these postulates and introduce some of the related mathematical tools and concepts that are needed to arrive at their logical consequences later. To those who have not been exposed to the subject of quantum mechanics before, each of these postulates taken by itself may appear puzzling and meaningless at first. It should be borne in mind, however, that it is the collection of these postulates as a whole that forms the foundations of quantum mechanics.