Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9511005

About Position Measurements Which Do Not Show the Bohmian Particle Position

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

Published Nov 6, 1995• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

``Weak'', ``protective'', and ``delayed observation'' measurements are analyzed in the framework of the Bohm interpretation of quantum theory. It is argued that the above varieties of measurements manifest some difficulties of the Bohm interpretation since they show that Bohmian trajectories behave not as we would expect from a classical type model.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9511005

Related papers

Measurements of Bohmian Trajectories

Florian Huber, Carlotta Versmold, Jan Dziewior +5 more

Standard quantum mechanics famously disallows to simultaneously measure particle position and momentum with arbitrary precision. In contrast, Bohmian mechanics, a hidden-variable interpretation, at the same time ascribes reality to the positions and momenta of quantum particles at the cost of a nonlocal ontology [1]. It thus allows to conceive of definite particle trajectories, while being fully compatible with the standard theory in all empirical predictions. To record such trajectories [2] we consider two optical settings using weak measurements in order to investigate different features of particle propagation in the Bohmian picture.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 26, 2023•0 citations

Time and Ensemble Averages in Bohmian Mechanics

Yakir Aharonov, Noam Erez A, Marian O. Scully

We show that in the framework of one-dimensional Bohmian Quantum Mechanics [D Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85 166 and 180 (1952)], for a particle subject to a potential undergoing a weak adiabatic change, the time averages of the particle's positions typically differ markedly from the ensemble averages. We apply this result to the case where the weak perturbing potential is the back-action of a measuring device (i.e. a protective measurement). It is shown that under these conditions, most trajectories never cross the position measured (as already shown for a particular example in a previous paper).

arXiv:quant-ph/0412068•Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 2004•17 citations

Protective measurements and the meaning of the wave function in the de Broglie-Bohm theory

Shan Gao

There are three possible interpretations of the wave function in the de Broglie-Bohm theory: taking the wave function as corresponding to a physical entity or a property of the Bohmian particles or a law. In this paper, we argue that the first interpretation is favored by an analysis of protective measurements. The de Broglie-Bohm theory is an alternative to standard quantum mechan-ics initially proposed by de Broglie (1928) and later developed by Bohm (1952). According to the theory, a complete description of a quantum system is provided by the configuration defined by the positions of its particles together with its wave function. The wave function follows the linear Schrödinger equation and never collapses. The motion of the particles, which are usually called Bohmian particles, follows the so-called guiding equation. Although the de Broglie-Bohm theory is mathematically equivalent to quantum mechanics, there is no clear consensus with regard to its physical interpretation. In particular, the interpre-

•May 24, 2013•0 citations

Some Observations upon "Realistic" Trajectories in Bohmian Quantum Mechanics

M. C. Boscá

Experimental situations in which we observe quantum effects that deviate from the intuitive expectations of the classical world call for an interdisciplinary discussion, and one fundamental issue to be considered is the compatibility between the description of phenomena and the assumption of an objective reality. This paper discusses the ontological interpretation of Bohmian quantum mechanics, focusing on the use of the term "trajectory" and the difficulties associated with its connection to a "real" (objective) trajectory. My conclusion is that the intended realistic interpretation of Bohmian trajectories is highly doubtful.

THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science•Feb 18, 2013•4 citations

Weak measurements of trajectories in quantum systems: classical, Bohmian and sum over paths

A. Matzkin

Weak values, obtained from weak measurements, attempt to describe the properties of a quantum system as it evolves from an initial to a final state, without practically altering this evolution. Trajectories can be defined from weak measurements of the position, or inferred from weak values of the momentum operator. The former can be connected to the asymptotic form of the Feynman propagator and the latter to Bohmian trajectories. Employing a time-dependent oscillator as a model, this work analyzes to what extent weak measurements can shed light on the underlying dynamics of a quantum system expressed in terms of trajectories, in particular by comparing the two approaches.

arXiv:1411.3855•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 6, 2015•8 citations

Observables and Unobservables in Quantum Mechanics: How the No-Hidden-Variables Theorems Support the Bohmian Particle Ontology

Dustin Lazarovici, Andréa Oldofredi, Michaël Esfeld

The paper argues that far from challenging-or even refuting-Bohm's quantum theory, the no-hidden-variables theorems in fact support the Bohmian ontology for quantum mechanics. The reason is that (i) all measurements come down to position measurements; and (ii) Bohm's theory provides a clear and coherent explanation of the measurement outcome statistics based on an ontology of particle positions, a law for their evolution and a probability measure linked with that law. What the no-hidden-variables theorems teach us is that (i) one cannot infer the properties that the physical systems possess from observables; and that (ii) measurements, being an interaction like other interactions, change the state of the measured system.

arXiv:1805.07120•Entropy•May 18, 2018•27 citations
Weak'', protective'', and ``delayed observation'' measurements are analyzed in the framework of the Bohm interpretation of quantum theory. It is argued that the above varieties of measurements manifest some difficulties of the Bohm interpretation since they show that Bohmian trajectories behave not as we would expect from a classical type model.
Standard quantum mechanics famously disallows to simultaneously measure particle position and momentum with arbitrary precision. In contrast, Bohmian mechanics, a hidden-variable interpretation, at the same time ascribes reality to the positions and momenta of quantum particles at the cost of a nonlocal ontology [1]. It thus allows to conceive of definite particle trajectories, while being fully compatible with the standard theory in all empirical predictions. To record such trajectories [2] we consider two optical settings using weak measurements in order to investigate different features of particle propagation in the Bohmian picture.
We show that in the framework of one-dimensional Bohmian Quantum Mechanics [D Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85 166 and 180 (1952)], for a particle subject to a potential undergoing a weak adiabatic change, the time averages of the particle's positions typically differ markedly from the ensemble averages. We apply this result to the case where the weak perturbing potential is the back-action of a measuring device (i.e. a protective measurement). It is shown that under these conditions, most trajectories never cross the position measured (as already shown for a particular example in a previous paper).
There are three possible interpretations of the wave function in the de Broglie-Bohm theory: taking the wave function as corresponding to a physical entity or a property of the Bohmian particles or a law. In this paper, we argue that the first interpretation is favored by an analysis of protective measurements. The de Broglie-Bohm theory is an alternative to standard quantum mechan-ics initially proposed by de Broglie (1928) and later developed by Bohm (1952). According to the theory, a complete description of a quantum system is provided by the configuration defined by the positions of its particles together with its wave function. The wave function follows the linear Schrödinger equation and never collapses. The motion of the particles, which are usually called Bohmian particles, follows the so-called guiding equation. Although the de Broglie-Bohm theory is mathematically equivalent to quantum mechanics, there is no clear consensus with regard to its physical interpretation. In particular, the interpre-
Experimental situations in which we observe quantum effects that deviate from the intuitive expectations of the classical world call for an interdisciplinary discussion, and one fundamental issue to be considered is the compatibility between the description of phenomena and the assumption of an objective reality. This paper discusses the ontological interpretation of Bohmian quantum mechanics, focusing on the use of the term "trajectory" and the difficulties associated with its connection to a "real" (objective) trajectory. My conclusion is that the intended realistic interpretation of Bohmian trajectories is highly doubtful.
Weak values, obtained from weak measurements, attempt to describe the properties of a quantum system as it evolves from an initial to a final state, without practically altering this evolution. Trajectories can be defined from weak measurements of the position, or inferred from weak values of the momentum operator. The former can be connected to the asymptotic form of the Feynman propagator and the latter to Bohmian trajectories. Employing a time-dependent oscillator as a model, this work analyzes to what extent weak measurements can shed light on the underlying dynamics of a quantum system expressed in terms of trajectories, in particular by comparing the two approaches.
The paper argues that far from challenging-or even refuting-Bohm's quantum theory, the no-hidden-variables theorems in fact support the Bohmian ontology for quantum mechanics. The reason is that (i) all measurements come down to position measurements; and (ii) Bohm's theory provides a clear and coherent explanation of the measurement outcome statistics based on an ontology of particle positions, a law for their evolution and a probability measure linked with that law. What the no-hidden-variables theorems teach us is that (i) one cannot infer the properties that the physical systems possess from observables; and that (ii) measurements, being an interaction like other interactions, change the state of the measured system.