Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9506001 · Physical Review A

Entropy of phase measurement: Quantum phase via quadrature measurement

Z. Hradil, Robert Myška, Tomáš Opatrný, J. Bajer

Published Jun 1, 1996• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The content of phase information of an arbitrary phase-sensitive measurement is evaluated using the maximum likelihood estimation. The phase distribution is characterized by the relative entropy---a nonlinear functional of input quantum state. As an explicit example, the multiple measurement of the quadrature operator is interpreted as quantum phase detection achieving the ultimate resolution predicted by the Fisher information. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.53.3738

Related papers

Maximum-likelihood statistics of multiple quantum phase measurements

Samuel L. Braunstein, Carlton M. Caves, Alistair S. Lane

Recent theoretical studies have considered various possibilities for experimental measurements of phase using quantum states of a finite mean number of photons. Currently, the most experimentally accessible of these possibilities is an interferometric phase measurement using a squeezed state that has minimum variance for the phase quadrature; this possibility can yield, in principle, a phase measurement with uncertainty of order l/(mean number of photons). Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong1 (SSW) have proposed another possibility. They maximize the peak likelihood in an abstract measurement of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, and they claim a phase sensitivity that goes as l/(mean number of photons).2 The SSW phase probability distribution consists of an extremely narrow peak sitting on a broad base that covers the entire 2 radians of phase; as a result, a single SSW phase measurement has poor sensitivity. Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong argue that their claimed sensitivity can be achieved in a sequence of measurements. We study the statistics of the maximum-likelihood estimator in a sequence of SSW phase measurements, and we report how the uncertainty in the estimator scales with the mean number of photons used in the entire sequence.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1990•1 citation

Phase Estimation in Linear and Nonlinear Interferometers

Sushovit Adhikari

Phase estimation has a wide range of applications. Over the years, several strategies have been studied to improve precision in phase estimation. These strategies include using exotic quantum states to quantum detection schemes. This dissertation summarizes my effort in improving the precision of phase estimation with a linear and nonlinear interferometer. Chapter 1 introduces quantum optics and quantum metrology. I introduce all relevant quantum states of light used. We also look into tools and terminologies of quantum metrology such as Fisher information, shot-noise limit, Heisenberg limit, etc., along with examples of phase estimation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In Chapter 2, I discuss multiple phase estimation using a multimode interferometer. Building upon previous work, our scheme consists of a multimode interferometer with single-photon inputs. By using a quantum Fisher information analysis, we show that our scheme gives a constant improvement over other schemes. We also show that our scheme with photon-number-resolving detection approaches the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. Moreover, we also consider the probabilistic nature of photon emission at the input, and we study its effect on phase sensitivity. I discuss phase estimation with SU(1,1) interferometer in Chapter 3. We look at phase sensitivity in this interferometer with different input states. Namely, we consider two different phase estimation scheme, one using thermal and squeezed states, and others using coherent and displaced squeezed states with parity and on-off as a detection scheme. We also look into the effect of photon loss inside the interferometer. In Chapter 4, we revisit phase estimation in SU(1,1) interferometer from the perspective of quantum Fisher information. I discuss in detail a longstanding confusion regarding the use of quantum Fisher information in SU(1,1) interferometer. We show that phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is needed in general for calculating the phase sensitivity which resolves inconsistencies reported in previously published articles.

Civil War Book Review•Feb 22, 2019•0 citations

Quantum phase measurements with infinite peak-likelihood and zero phase information

Z. Hradil, Jeffrey H. Shapiro

Maximum likelihood estimation of an unknown c-number phaseshift is considered, along the lines established by Shapiro, Shepard and Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol.62, p.2377, 1989. An input state is exhibited whose reciprocal peak likelihood vanishes, delta phi to 0, while its phase-measurement probability density converges, in distribution, to uniform, p( phi mod Phi ) to d 1/2 pi .

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Feb 1, 1992•22 citations

New strategies for phase estimation in quantum optics

Yang Gao

One important problem in quantum optics is to resolve an extremely small change of phase shift. The complementarity between photon number and phase sets an ultimate limit, the so-called Heisenberg limit, on the phase measurement sensitivity. The precise phase estimation has many technological applications, such as optical gyroscopes, gravitational wave detection, quantum imaging and sensing. In this thesis I show that the utilization of the parity measurement in the optical interferometry is actually applicable to a wide range of quantum entangled input states. Comparison of the performance of the various quantum states then can be made within such a unified output measurement scheme. Based on such a universal detection scheme, we present a comparison of the phase sensitivity reduction for various quantum states of light in the presence of photon loss. I also provide a simple condition that could be used to check whether an arbitrary state can achieve the Heisenberg limit independently of the detection scheme. It implies that the fidelity between the two output states with zero phase and minimal detectable phase applied respectively should significantly different from unity as the minimal phase shift scaling as 1/N, whereas the average number of input photons N goes to infinity. Next I give several measures to characterize the which-way information in the interference experiment. We define a new distinguishability associated with the fidelity between two density matrices to measure the which-way information. We demonstrate that the changes of mutual entropy as well as the entanglement of formation of the whole system, i.e. the physical system plus the which-way detector can also be used to describe the which-way information. With such quantities, we show that as the fringe visibility of the interference pattern gets larger, the less which-way information is obtained. Finally, I show that coherent light coupled with photon number resolving detectors can provide a super-resolution much below the Rayleigh diffraction limit, with sensitivity no worse than shot-noise in terms of the detected photon power. This scheme would have applications to laser radar, given the difficulty in making entangled states of light, as well as their susceptibility to atmospheric absorption.

Civil War Book Review•May 31, 2010•0 citations

Quantum phase resolution and phase distribution

Gunnar G. Bjork, Alexei S. Trifonov, Tedros Tsegaye +1 more

We discuss generation and measurement strategies for maximum-likelihood estimation of small phase shifts. We demonstrate that optimal encoding of small phase shifts and optimal measurements of small phase shifts require different states. We also show that states with identical phase resolution may have rather different Pegg-Barnett phase distributions. Hence, the connection between phase distribution and quantum phase resolution is rather weak.

Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Dec 1, 1998•10 citations

Quantum theory of incompatible observations

Z. Hradil, J Summhammer

The question of what information about a quantum state may be inferred from a sequence of measurements made on it, is addressed. The main result is that maximum-likelihood estimation gives an arguably natural optimum approach in quantum theory. It singles out a particular choice of basis, in which the state is expressed. Various incompatible and incomplete observations made on the ensemble are treated as a complete generalized measurement. Consequently, the maximum likelihood (relative entropy) is the best measure for relating experimental data with theoretical predictions of quantum theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/9911067•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 11, 2000•15 citations
The content of phase information of an arbitrary phase-sensitive measurement is evaluated using the maximum likelihood estimation. The phase distribution is characterized by the relative entropy---a nonlinear functional of input quantum state. As an explicit example, the multiple measurement of the quadrature operator is interpreted as quantum phase detection achieving the ultimate resolution predicted by the Fisher information. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Recent theoretical studies have considered various possibilities for experimental measurements of phase using quantum states of a finite mean number of photons. Currently, the most experimentally accessible of these possibilities is an interferometric phase measurement using a squeezed state that has minimum variance for the phase quadrature; this possibility can yield, in principle, a phase measurement with uncertainty of order l/(mean number of photons). Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong1 (SSW) have proposed another possibility. They maximize the peak likelihood in an abstract measurement of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, and they claim a phase sensitivity that goes as l/(mean number of photons).2 The SSW phase probability distribution consists of an extremely narrow peak sitting on a broad base that covers the entire 2 radians of phase; as a result, a single SSW phase measurement has poor sensitivity. Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong argue that their claimed sensitivity can be achieved in a sequence of measurements. We study the statistics of the maximum-likelihood estimator in a sequence of SSW phase measurements, and we report how the uncertainty in the estimator scales with the mean number of photons used in the entire sequence.
Phase estimation has a wide range of applications. Over the years, several strategies have been studied to improve precision in phase estimation. These strategies include using exotic quantum states to quantum detection schemes. This dissertation summarizes my effort in improving the precision of phase estimation with a linear and nonlinear interferometer. Chapter 1 introduces quantum optics and quantum metrology. I introduce all relevant quantum states of light used. We also look into tools and terminologies of quantum metrology such as Fisher information, shot-noise limit, Heisenberg limit, etc., along with examples of phase estimation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In Chapter 2, I discuss multiple phase estimation using a multimode interferometer. Building upon previous work, our scheme consists of a multimode interferometer with single-photon inputs. By using a quantum Fisher information analysis, we show that our scheme gives a constant improvement over other schemes. We also show that our scheme with photon-number-resolving detection approaches the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. Moreover, we also consider the probabilistic nature of photon emission at the input, and we study its effect on phase sensitivity. I discuss phase estimation with SU(1,1) interferometer in Chapter 3. We look at phase sensitivity in this interferometer with different input states. Namely, we consider two different phase estimation scheme, one using thermal and squeezed states, and others using coherent and displaced squeezed states with parity and on-off as a detection scheme. We also look into the effect of photon loss inside the interferometer. In Chapter 4, we revisit phase estimation in SU(1,1) interferometer from the perspective of quantum Fisher information. I discuss in detail a longstanding confusion regarding the use of quantum Fisher information in SU(1,1) interferometer. We show that phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is needed in general for calculating the phase sensitivity which resolves inconsistencies reported in previously published articles.
One important problem in quantum optics is to resolve an extremely small change of phase shift. The complementarity between photon number and phase sets an ultimate limit, the so-called Heisenberg limit, on the phase measurement sensitivity. The precise phase estimation has many technological applications, such as optical gyroscopes, gravitational wave detection, quantum imaging and sensing. In this thesis I show that the utilization of the parity measurement in the optical interferometry is actually applicable to a wide range of quantum entangled input states. Comparison of the performance of the various quantum states then can be made within such a unified output measurement scheme. Based on such a universal detection scheme, we present a comparison of the phase sensitivity reduction for various quantum states of light in the presence of photon loss. I also provide a simple condition that could be used to check whether an arbitrary state can achieve the Heisenberg limit independently of the detection scheme. It implies that the fidelity between the two output states with zero phase and minimal detectable phase applied respectively should significantly different from unity as the minimal phase shift scaling as 1/N, whereas the average number of input photons N goes to infinity. Next I give several measures to characterize the which-way information in the interference experiment. We define a new distinguishability associated with the fidelity between two density matrices to measure the which-way information. We demonstrate that the changes of mutual entropy as well as the entanglement of formation of the whole system, i.e. the physical system plus the which-way detector can also be used to describe the which-way information. With such quantities, we show that as the fringe visibility of the interference pattern gets larger, the less which-way information is obtained. Finally, I show that coherent light coupled with photon number resolving detectors can provide a super-resolution much below the Rayleigh diffraction limit, with sensitivity no worse than shot-noise in terms of the detected photon power. This scheme would have applications to laser radar, given the difficulty in making entangled states of light, as well as their susceptibility to atmospheric absorption.
The question of what information about a quantum state may be inferred from a sequence of measurements made on it, is addressed. The main result is that maximum-likelihood estimation gives an arguably natural optimum approach in quantum theory. It singles out a particular choice of basis, in which the state is expressed. Various incompatible and incomplete observations made on the ensemble are treated as a complete generalized measurement. Consequently, the maximum likelihood (relative entropy) is the best measure for relating experimental data with theoretical predictions of quantum theory.