Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9503013 · Communications in Mathematical Physics

On the global existence of Bohmian mechanics

Karin Berndl, D. Dürr, Sheldon Goldstein, Giulio Peruzzi, Nino Zanghı̀

Published Nov 1, 1995• 120 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/bf02101660

Related papers

Existence of trajectories for Bohmian mechanics

Karin Berndl, Detlef D�rr, Sheldon Goldstein +2 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1993•6 citations

Global Existence and Uniqueness of Bohmian Trajectories

Karin Berndl

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1996•7 citations

Simple Proof for Global Existence of Bohmian Trajectories

Stefan Teufel, Roderich Tumulka

arXiv:math-ph/0406030•Communications in Mathematical Physics•Feb 25, 2005•57 citations

Global existence and uniqueness of Bohmian trajectories

Karin Berndl

It is shown that Bohmian mechanics is internally consistent in the sense that the equations of motion typically have global solutions despite the fact that the velocity field is singular at the nodes of the wave function and at other points. This result is fundamental for the derivation of the quantum formalism. The role of the quantum flux is emphasized.

arXiv:quant-ph/9509009•Sep 18, 1995•0 citations

Bohmian Mechanics: A Panacea for What Ails Quantum Mechanics, or a Different and Problematic Theory?

Aristidis Arageorgis, John Earman

The popular impression of Bohmian mechanics is that it is standard quantum mechanics with the addition of some extra gadgets---exact particle positions and a guiding equation for particle trajectories---the advantages being that the gadgets pave the way for a resolution of the measurement problem that eschews state vector reduction while restoring the determinism lost in standard quantum mechanics. In fact, the Bohmian mechanics departs in significant ways from standard quantum mechanics. By itself this is not a basis for criticism; indeed, it makes Bohmian mechanics all the more interesting. But Bohmian mechanics is not, as the popular impression would have it, empirically equivalent to standard quantum mechanics in terms of probabilistic predictions for the outcomes of measurements of quantum observables. Indeed, in physically important applications to systems for which standard quantum mechanics delivers empirically well-confirmed probabilistic predictions, the sophisticated form of Bohmian mechanics designed to prove the global existence of Bohmian particle trajectories fails to deliver unequivocal predictions---of even a probabilistic variety---for the future behavior of said systems. Possible responses to this lacuna are discussed.

•Apr 19, 2017•1 citation

On the Interpretation of Bohmian Mechanics

Arthur I. Fine

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1996•13 citations
The popular impression of Bohmian mechanics is that it is standard quantum mechanics with the addition of some extra gadgets---exact particle positions and a guiding equation for particle trajectories---the advantages being that the gadgets pave the way for a resolution of the measurement problem that eschews state vector reduction while restoring the determinism lost in standard quantum mechanics. In fact, the Bohmian mechanics departs in significant ways from standard quantum mechanics. By itself this is not a basis for criticism; indeed, it makes Bohmian mechanics all the more interesting. But Bohmian mechanics is not, as the popular impression would have it, empirically equivalent to standard quantum mechanics in terms of probabilistic predictions for the outcomes of measurements of quantum observables. Indeed, in physically important applications to systems for which standard quantum mechanics delivers empirically well-confirmed probabilistic predictions, the sophisticated form of Bohmian mechanics designed to prove the global existence of Bohmian particle trajectories fails to deliver unequivocal predictions---of even a probabilistic variety---for the future behavior of said systems. Possible responses to this lacuna are discussed.