Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0702068 · Physical Review Letters

How Continuous Quantum Measurements in Finite Dimensions Are Actually Discrete

Giulio Chiribella, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Dirk Schlingemann

Published May 11, 2007• 54 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We show that in finite dimensions a quantum measurement with a continuous set of outcomes can be always realized as a continuous random choice of measurements with a finite number of outcomes.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.98.190403

Related papers

Realization of continuous-outcome measurements on finite dimensional quantum systems

Giulio Chiribella, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Dirk-M. Schlingemann

This note contains the complete mathematical proof of the main Theorem of the paper "How continuous measurements in finite dimension are actually discrete" (quant-ph/0702068), thus showing that in finite dimension any measurement with continuous set of outcomes can be simply realized by randomizing some classical parameter and conditionally performing a measurement with finite outcomes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0703110•Mar 13, 2007•1 citation

Quantum Measurements Cannot be Proved to be Random

Caroline Rogers

We show that it is impossible to prove that the outcome of a quantum measurement is random.

arXiv:1008.5022•Aug 30, 2010•0 citations

A Note on the Set of After-measurement States in Generalized Quantum Measurement

Igor D. Ivanović

The sets of after-measurement states for standard and generalized quantum measurements are compared. It is shown that for a SIC-POVM generalized measurement, the ratio of the volume of the set of after-measurement states and the volume of the simplex generated by individual outcomes quickly tends to zero with increase of the number of dimensions. The volumes used are based on the Hilbert-Schmidt norm. Some consequences on actual realizations, having finite collections of systems are discussed.

arXiv:1008.0671•Aug 3, 2010•0 citations

On quantum measurement

Alexander B. Givental

We propose a solution to the quantum measurement paradox by first identifying its classical counterpart.

arXiv:2311.02233•Nov 3, 2023•0 citations

A particle in space

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

Continuous degrees of freedom The quantum systems we have discussed so far have been described by finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Basic measurements on such systems have a finite number of possible outcomes, and a quantum state predicts a discrete probability distribution over these. Now we wish to extend our theory to handle systems with one or more continuous degrees of freedom, such as the position of a particle that can move in one dimension. This will require an extension of our theory to Hilbert spaces of infinite dimension, and to systems with continuous observables. There is a philosophical issue here. How do we know that there really are infinitely many distinct locations for a particle? The short answer is, we don't. It might be that space itself is both discrete (at the tiniest scales) and bounded (at the largest), so that the number of possible locations of a particle is some very large but finite number. If this is the case, then the continuum model for space is nothing more than a convenient approximation. Infinity is just a simplified way of describing a quantity that is immense, but still finite. In this section, we will adopt this view of infinity. We will imagine that any continuous variable is really an approximation of a “true” discrete variable. This idea will motivate the continuous quantities and operations that we need.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2010•0 citations

There is no quantum measurement problem

N. David Mermin

The idea that the collapse of a quantum state is a physical process stems from a misunderstanding of probability and the role it plays in quantum mechanics.

Physics Today•Jun 1, 2022•32 citations
Continuous degrees of freedom The quantum systems we have discussed so far have been described by finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Basic measurements on such systems have a finite number of possible outcomes, and a quantum state predicts a discrete probability distribution over these. Now we wish to extend our theory to handle systems with one or more continuous degrees of freedom, such as the position of a particle that can move in one dimension. This will require an extension of our theory to Hilbert spaces of infinite dimension, and to systems with continuous observables. There is a philosophical issue here. How do we know that there really are infinitely many distinct locations for a particle? The short answer is, we don't. It might be that space itself is both discrete (at the tiniest scales) and bounded (at the largest), so that the number of possible locations of a particle is some very large but finite number. If this is the case, then the continuum model for space is nothing more than a convenient approximation. Infinity is just a simplified way of describing a quantity that is immense, but still finite. In this section, we will adopt this view of infinity. We will imagine that any continuous variable is really an approximation of a “true” discrete variable. This idea will motivate the continuous quantities and operations that we need.