We consider macroscopic, mesoscopic, and ``
S-scopic'' quantum superpositions of eigenstates of an observable and develop some signatures for their existence. We define the extent, or size
S of a superposition, with respect to an observable $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x}$, as being the range of outcomes of $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x}$ predicted by that superposition. Such superpositions are referred to as generalized
S-scopic superpositions to distinguish them from the extreme superpositions that superpose only the two states that have a difference
S in their prediction for the observable. We also consider generalized
S-scopic superpositions of coherent states. We explore the constraints that are placed on the statistics if we suppose a system to be described by mixtures of superpositions that are restricted in size. In this way we arrive at experimental criteria that are sufficient to deduce the existence of a generalized
S-scopic superposition. The signatures developed are useful where one is able to demonstrate a degree of squeezing. We also discuss how the signatures enable a new type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen gedanken experiment.
According to classical theory, a system with two or more macroscopically distinct states available to it is in one of those states at all times. Quantum mechanics gives a different interpretation where the system can be in a superposition of such states. In this paper, we derive criteria in the form of inequalities to detect this effect, referred to as mesoscopic quantum coherence, where the states are (at least) mesoscopically distinct. Such criteria are also signatures of a mesoscopic Schr\"odinger cat paradox. We extend the treatment to consider definitions and criteria for mesoscopically entangled states, which are a subset of the states exhibiting mesoscopic quantum coherence. It is shown how the criteria (referred to as type I criteria) can be applied to detect the mesoscopic entanglement of systems prepared in NOON states, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, and entangled cat states involving coherent states. Here, a larger system
C is entangled with a second system
S, which can be small. The proposed definition of mesoscopic (macroscopic) entanglement involves the Schmidt decomposition, and can be applied to systems in a superposition of many states, only some pairs of which are mesoscopically (macroscopically) distinguishable. We prove that a higher-order Hillery-Zubairy entanglement criterion will detect mesoscopic entanglement of this type, and use this to demonstrate the mesoscopic entanglement of the ground state of a two-mode Bose-Einstein condensate. Finally, we explain how a subset of the type I criteria (called type II criteria) are EPR steering inequalities allowing realization of a mesoscopic or macroscopic version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for macroscopic superposition states. Where the two systems
C and
S are spatially separated, we then use results from the literature to point out it is not possible to complete quantum mechanics using hidden-variable theories compatible with the assumption of locality between the two systems. The violation of certain Bell inequalities is sufficient to prove this result, which gives a stricter signature of the Schr\"odinger cat paradox and of mesoscopic quantum coherence. We call such signatures type III criteria.
We study a class of quantum measurement models. A microscopic object is entangled with a macroscopic pointer such that a distinct pointer position is tied to each eigenvalue of the measured object observable. Those different pointer positions mutually decohere under the influence of an environment. Overcoming limitations of previous approaches we (i) cope with initial correlations between pointer and environment by considering them initially in a metastable local thermal equilibrium, (ii) allow for object–pointer entanglement and environment-induced decoherence of distinct pointer readouts to proceed simultaneously, such that mixtures of macroscopically distinct object–pointer product states arise without intervening macroscopic superpositions, and (iii) go beyond the Markovian treatment of decoherence.
We study a class of quantum measurement models. A microscopic object is entangled with a macroscopic pointer such that each eigenvalue of the measured object observable is tied up with a specific pointer deflection. Different pointer positions mutually decohere under the influence of a bath. Object-pointer entanglement and decoherence of distinct pointer readouts proceed simultaneously. Mixtures of macroscopically distinct object-pointer states may then arise without intervening macroscopic superpositions. Initially, object and apparatus are statistically independent while the latter has pointer and bath correlated according to a metastable local thermal equilibrium. We obtain explicit results for the object-pointer dynamics with temporal coherence decay in general neither exponential nor Gaussian. The decoherence time does not depend on details of the pointer-bath coupling if it is smaller than the bath correlation time, whereas in the opposite Markov regime the decay depends strongly on whether that coupling is Ohmic or super-Ohmic.
Theory and experiment both demonstrate that an entangled quantum state of two subsystems is neither a superposition of states of its subsystems nor a superposition of composite states but rather a coherent superposition of nonlocal correlations between incoherently mixed local states of the two subsystems. Thus, even if one subsystem happens to be macroscopic as in the entangled "Schrodinger's cat" state resulting from an ideal measurement, this state is not the paradoxical macroscopic superposition it is generally presumed to be. It is, instead, a "macroscopic correlation," a coherent quantum correlation in which one of the two correlated sub-systems happens to be macroscopic. This clarifies the physical meaning of entanglement: When a superposed quantum system A is unitarily entangled with a second quantum system B, the coherence of the original superposition of different states of A is transferred to different correlations between states of A and B, so the entangled state becomes a superposition of correlations rather than a superposition of states. This transfer preserves unitary evolution while permitting B to be macroscopic without entailing a macroscopic superposition. This resolves the "problem of outcomes" but is not a complete resolution of the measurement problem because the entangled state is still reversible.