Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0701200

Information and measurement in generally covariant quantum theory

S. Jay Olson, Jonathan P. Dowling

Published Jan 28, 2007• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Due to the absence of an external, classical time variable, the probabilistic predictions of covariant quantum theory are ambiguous when multiple measurements are considered. Here, we introduce an information theoretic framework to the covariant formalism, and use it to interpret the measurement process. We find that the time ordering of measurements emerges as an entropy relationship in the state of the observers, giving unique probabilities for multiple measurements. This approach suggests a new, fully self-contained probability interpretation for generally covariant quantum physics, which makes use of a quantum mechanical description of the observer, in contrast to standard quantum mechanics which assumes an external, classical observer.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0701200

Related papers

Generally covariant quantum information

S. Jay Olson

The formalism of covariant quantum theory, introduced by Reisenberger and Rovelli, casts the description of quantum states and evolution into a framework compatible with the principles of general relativity. The leap to this covariant formalism, however, outstripped the standard interpretation used to connect quantum theory to experimental predictions, leaving the predictions of the theory ambiguous. In particular, the absence of a pre-defined time variable or background causal structure resulted in an ``order of projections" ambiguity, in which the usual rule for multiple-measurement probabilities (obtained by time-ordered projections) is not defined. Equally troublesome, the probability postulate of Reisenberger and Rovelli fails to reproduce the Born interpretation for the case of simple quantum mechanical systems. Here, we develop an alternative quantum measurement formalism, based on basic principles of quantum information. After reviewing how this can be done in the context of the traditional formulation of quantum mechanics and noting its implications for the quantum measurement problem, we find that this approach can be generalized to the covariant setting, where it essentially solves the correspondence problems of covariant quantum theory. We show explicit agreement with the Born interpretation of standard quantum mechanics in the context of simple systems. We also demonstrate the origin of the quantum mechanical arrow of time within our framework, and use this to solve the order of projections ambiguity. In addition to compatibility with general covariance, we show that our framework has other attractive and satisfying features - it is fully unitary, realist, and self-contained. The full unitarity of the formalism in the presence of measurements allows us to invoke time-reversal symmetry to obtain new predictions closely related to the quantum Zeno effect.

Civil War Book Review•Apr 9, 2008•0 citations

Probability, unitarity, and realism in generally covariant quantum information

S. Jay Olson, Jonathan P. Dowling

The formalism of covariant quantum theory, introduced by Reisenberger and Rovelli, casts the description of quantum states and evolution into a framework compatable with the principles of general relativity. The leap to this covariant formalism, however, outstripped the standard interpretation used to connect quantum theory to experimental predictions, leaving the predictions of the RR theory ambiguous. Here we discuss in detail some implications of our recently proposed description of covariant quantum information (CQI), which addresses these problems. We show explicit agreement with standard quantum mechanics in the appropriate limit. In addition to compatability with general covariance, we show that our framework has other attractive and satisfying features -- it is fully unitary, realist, and self-contained. The full unitarity of the formalism in the presence of measurements allows us to invoke time-reversal symmetry to obtain new predictions closely related to the quantum Zeno effect.

arXiv:0708.3535•Aug 27, 2007•4 citations

The Nature of Information in Quantum Mechanics

Abstract: A suitable unified statistical formulation of quantum and classical mechanics in a ∗-algebraic setting leads us to conclude that information itself is noncommutative in quantum mechanics. Specifically we refer here to an observer’s information regarding a physical system. This is seen as the main difference from classical mechanics, where an observer’s information regarding a physical system obeys classical probability theory. Quantum mechanics is then viewed purely as a mathematical framework for the probabilistic description of noncommutative information, with the projection postulate being a noncommutative generalization of conditional probability. This view clarifies many problems surrounding the interpretation of quantum mechanics, particularly problems relating to the measuring process. 1.

•Jan 1, 2002•3 citations

QUANTUM PROBABILITY FROM CLASSICAL SIGNAL THEORY

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Masanori Ohya, Noboru Watanabe

We present quantum mechanics (QM) as theory of special classical random signals. On one hand, this approach provides a possibility to go beyond conventional QM: to create a finer description of micro processes than given by the QM-formalism. In fact, we present a model with hidden variables of the wave-type. On the other hand, our approach establishes coupling between quantum and classical information theories. We recall that quantum information theory has already been used for description of the entropy of Gaussian input signals for noisy channels. The entropy of a classical random input was invented as the entropy of the quantum density operator corresponding to the covariance operator of the input process.1 In this paper, we proceed the other way around: we apply classical signal theory to create a measurement model which reproduces quantum probabilities.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Jan 1, 2011•14 citations

Probabilities as Measures of Information

F.G. Perey

We analyze the notion that physical theories are quantitative and testable by observations in experiments. This leads us to propose a new, Bayesian, interpretation of probabilities in physics that unifies their current use in classical physical theories, experimental physics and quantum mechanics. Probabilities are the result of quantifying the domain of possibilities that results when we interpret observations within the framework of a physical theory. They could also be said to be measures of information used to make predictions based upon a physical theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/0310073•APS•Oct 12, 2003•1 citation

Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory

Hrvoje Nikolić

This chapter considers a more realistic variation of the measuring procedure, taking into account the fact that the measured particles become entangled with the measuring apparatus at some finite time. The results are also generalized to quantum field theory, where quantum states are represented by wave functions depending on an infinite number of space-time coordinates. Thus, to make Bohmian mechanics covariant, one needs first to reformulate the standard quantum mechanics (QM) in a covariant way such that time is treated on an equal footing with space. Another physically interesting situation is when the entanglement with the environment takes the form, where are coherent states. In general, in the Bohmian interpretation all the other quantities may have a distribution totally different from those predicted by purely probabilistic QM. The space probability density should be generalized to the space-time probability density.

arXiv:1205.1992•May 24, 2019•11 citations
Due to the absence of an external, classical time variable, the probabilistic predictions of covariant quantum theory are ambiguous when multiple measurements are considered. Here, we introduce an information theoretic framework to the covariant formalism, and use it to interpret the measurement process. We find that the time ordering of measurements emerges as an entropy relationship in the state of the observers, giving unique probabilities for multiple measurements. This approach suggests a new, fully self-contained probability interpretation for generally covariant quantum physics, which makes use of a quantum mechanical description of the observer, in contrast to standard quantum mechanics which assumes an external, classical observer.
The formalism of covariant quantum theory, introduced by Reisenberger and Rovelli, casts the description of quantum states and evolution into a framework compatible with the principles of general relativity. The leap to this covariant formalism, however, outstripped the standard interpretation used to connect quantum theory to experimental predictions, leaving the predictions of the theory ambiguous. In particular, the absence of a pre-defined time variable or background causal structure resulted in an ``order of projections" ambiguity, in which the usual rule for multiple-measurement probabilities (obtained by time-ordered projections) is not defined. Equally troublesome, the probability postulate of Reisenberger and Rovelli fails to reproduce the Born interpretation for the case of simple quantum mechanical systems. Here, we develop an alternative quantum measurement formalism, based on basic principles of quantum information. After reviewing how this can be done in the context of the traditional formulation of quantum mechanics and noting its implications for the quantum measurement problem, we find that this approach can be generalized to the covariant setting, where it essentially solves the correspondence problems of covariant quantum theory. We show explicit agreement with the Born interpretation of standard quantum mechanics in the context of simple systems. We also demonstrate the origin of the quantum mechanical arrow of time within our framework, and use this to solve the order of projections ambiguity. In addition to compatibility with general covariance, we show that our framework has other attractive and satisfying features - it is fully unitary, realist, and self-contained. The full unitarity of the formalism in the presence of measurements allows us to invoke time-reversal symmetry to obtain new predictions closely related to the quantum Zeno effect.
The formalism of covariant quantum theory, introduced by Reisenberger and Rovelli, casts the description of quantum states and evolution into a framework compatable with the principles of general relativity. The leap to this covariant formalism, however, outstripped the standard interpretation used to connect quantum theory to experimental predictions, leaving the predictions of the RR theory ambiguous. Here we discuss in detail some implications of our recently proposed description of covariant quantum information (CQI), which addresses these problems. We show explicit agreement with standard quantum mechanics in the appropriate limit. In addition to compatability with general covariance, we show that our framework has other attractive and satisfying features -- it is fully unitary, realist, and self-contained. The full unitarity of the formalism in the presence of measurements allows us to invoke time-reversal symmetry to obtain new predictions closely related to the quantum Zeno effect.
Abstract: A suitable unified statistical formulation of quantum and classical mechanics in a ∗-algebraic setting leads us to conclude that information itself is noncommutative in quantum mechanics. Specifically we refer here to an observer’s information regarding a physical system. This is seen as the main difference from classical mechanics, where an observer’s information regarding a physical system obeys classical probability theory. Quantum mechanics is then viewed purely as a mathematical framework for the probabilistic description of noncommutative information, with the projection postulate being a noncommutative generalization of conditional probability. This view clarifies many problems surrounding the interpretation of quantum mechanics, particularly problems relating to the measuring process. 1.
We present quantum mechanics (QM) as theory of special classical random signals. On one hand, this approach provides a possibility to go beyond conventional QM: to create a finer description of micro processes than given by the QM-formalism. In fact, we present a model with hidden variables of the wave-type. On the other hand, our approach establishes coupling between quantum and classical information theories. We recall that quantum information theory has already been used for description of the entropy of Gaussian input signals for noisy channels. The entropy of a classical random input was invented as the entropy of the quantum density operator corresponding to the covariance operator of the input process.1 In this paper, we proceed the other way around: we apply classical signal theory to create a measurement model which reproduces quantum probabilities.
We analyze the notion that physical theories are quantitative and testable by observations in experiments. This leads us to propose a new, Bayesian, interpretation of probabilities in physics that unifies their current use in classical physical theories, experimental physics and quantum mechanics. Probabilities are the result of quantifying the domain of possibilities that results when we interpret observations within the framework of a physical theory. They could also be said to be measures of information used to make predictions based upon a physical theory.
This chapter considers a more realistic variation of the measuring procedure, taking into account the fact that the measured particles become entangled with the measuring apparatus at some finite time. The results are also generalized to quantum field theory, where quantum states are represented by wave functions depending on an infinite number of space-time coordinates. Thus, to make Bohmian mechanics covariant, one needs first to reformulate the standard quantum mechanics (QM) in a covariant way such that time is treated on an equal footing with space. Another physically interesting situation is when the entanglement with the environment takes the form, where are coherent states. In general, in the Bohmian interpretation all the other quantities may have a distribution totally different from those predicted by purely probabilistic QM. The space probability density should be generalized to the space-time probability density.