Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0611054 · ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)

Negative weights make adversaries stronger

Peter Høyer, Troy Lee, Robert Špalek

Published Jun 11, 2007• 215 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The quantum adversary method is one of the most successful techniques for proving lower bounds on quantum query complexity. It gives optimal lower bounds for many problems, has application to classical complexity in formula size lower bounds, and is versatile with equivalent formulations interms of weight schemes, eigen values, and Kolmogorov complexity. All these formulations rely on the principlethat if an algorithm successfully computes a function then, in particular, itis able to distinguish between inputs which map to different values.

DOI
10.1145/1250790.1250867

Related papers

Lower Bounds for Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity Using Kolmogorov Arguments

Sophie Laplante, Frédéric Magniez

We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted and unweighted methods of Ambainis and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks, and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, it can be shown that adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for Boolean functions f in $O(\min(\sqrt{n C_0(f)},\sqrt{n C_1(f)}))$, where $C_0, C_1$ is the certificate complexity and n is the size of the input.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2008•46 citations

Tight adversary bounds for composite functions

Peter Høyer, Troy Lee, Robert Špalek

The quantum adversary method is a versatile method for proving lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It yields tight bounds for many computational problems, is robust in having many equivalent formulations, and has natural connections to classical lower bounds. A further nice property of the adversary method is that it behaves very well with respect to composition of functions. We generalize the adversary method to include costs--each bit of the input can be given an arbitrary positive cost representing the difficulty of querying that bit. We use this generalization to exactly capture the adversary bound of a composite function in terms of the adversary bounds of its component functions. Our results generalize and unify previously known composition properties of adversary methods, and yield as a simple corollary the Omega(sqrt{n}) bound of Barnum and Saks on the quantum query complexity of read-once functions.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509067•Sep 9, 2005•12 citations

The Multiplicative Quantum Adversary

Robert Špalek

We present a new variant of the quantum adversary method, a method for proving lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of a function. Adversary methods work as follows: one defines a progress function based on the state of the algorithm, and shows that for a successful algorithm there is a large gap between the initial and final value of the progress, and furthermore that the progress function cannot change by much with a single query. All known variants upper-bound the difference of the progress function, whereas our new variant upper-bounds the ratio and that is why we coin it the multiplicative adversary. Our new method is rooted in the quantum lower-bound method by Ambainis (2005, 2006), based on the analysis of eigenspaces of the density matrix. Ambainis's method is technically very complicated, it lacks intuition, and it only works for symmetric functions. Our method fits well into the adversary framework, has a simple formulation in terms of common block-diagonalization of two operators, and works for all functions. Furthermore, we prove an unconditional strong direct product theorem for the multiplicative quantum adversary bound.

arXiv:quant-ph/0703237•IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC)•Jun 1, 2008•29 citations

A Direct Reduction from the Polynomial to the Adversary Method

Aleksandrs Belovs

The polynomial and the adversary methods are the two main tools for proving lower bounds on query complexity of quantum algorithms. Both methods have found a large number of applications, some problems more suitable for one method, some for the other. It is known though that the adversary method, in its general negative-weighted version, is tight for bounded-error quantum algorithms, whereas the polynomial method is not. By the tightness of the former, for any polynomial lower bound, there ought to exist a corresponding adversary lower bound. However, direct reduction was not known. In this paper, we give a simple and direct reduction from the polynomial method (in the form of a dual polynomial) to the adversary method. This shows that any lower bound in the form of a dual polynomial is actually an adversary lower bound of a specific form.

Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

A Direct Reduction from the Polynomial to the Adversary Method

Aleksandrs Belovs

The polynomial and the adversary methods are the two main tools for proving lower bounds on query complexity of quantum algorithms. Both methods have found a large number of applications, some problems more suitable for one method, some for the other. It is known though that the adversary method, in its general negative-weighted version, is tight for bounded-error quantum algorithms, whereas the polynomial method is not. By the tightness of the former, for any polynomial lower bound, there ought to exist a corresponding adversary lower bound. However, direct reduction was not known. In this paper, we give a simple and direct reduction from the polynomial method (in the form of a dual polynomial) to the adversary method. This shows that any lower bound in the form of a dual polynomial is actually an adversary lower bound of a specific form.

arXiv:2301.10317•Jan 24, 2023•0 citations

Lower bounds for randomized and quantum query complexity using Kolmogorov arguments

Sophie Laplante, Frédéric Magniez

We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity, that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted, unweighted methods of Ambainis, and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for boolean functions $f$ in $O(\min(\sqrt{n C_0(f)},\sqrt{n C_1(f)}))$, where $C_0, C_1$ is the certificate complexity, and $n$ is the size of the input. We also derive a general form of the ad hoc weighted method used by Hoyer, Neerbek and Shi to give a quantum lower bound on ordered search and sorting.

arXiv:quant-ph/0311189•Nov 27, 2003•0 citations
The quantum adversary method is one of the most successful techniques for proving lower bounds on quantum query complexity. It gives optimal lower bounds for many problems, has application to classical complexity in formula size lower bounds, and is versatile with equivalent formulations interms of weight schemes, eigen values, and Kolmogorov complexity. All these formulations rely on the principlethat if an algorithm successfully computes a function then, in particular, itis able to distinguish between inputs which map to different values.
We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted and unweighted methods of Ambainis and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks, and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, it can be shown that adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for Boolean functions f in O(min⁡(nC0(f),nC1(f)))O(\min(\sqrt{n C_0(f)},\sqrt{n C_1(f)}))O(min(nC0​(f)​,nC1​(f)​)), where C0,C1C_0, C_1C0​,C1​ is the certificate complexity and n is the size of the input.
The quantum adversary method is a versatile method for proving lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It yields tight bounds for many computational problems, is robust in having many equivalent formulations, and has natural connections to classical lower bounds. A further nice property of the adversary method is that it behaves very well with respect to composition of functions. We generalize the adversary method to include costs--each bit of the input can be given an arbitrary positive cost representing the difficulty of querying that bit. We use this generalization to exactly capture the adversary bound of a composite function in terms of the adversary bounds of its component functions. Our results generalize and unify previously known composition properties of adversary methods, and yield as a simple corollary the Omega(sqrt{n}) bound of Barnum and Saks on the quantum query complexity of read-once functions.
We present a new variant of the quantum adversary method, a method for proving lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of a function. Adversary methods work as follows: one defines a progress function based on the state of the algorithm, and shows that for a successful algorithm there is a large gap between the initial and final value of the progress, and furthermore that the progress function cannot change by much with a single query. All known variants upper-bound the difference of the progress function, whereas our new variant upper-bounds the ratio and that is why we coin it the multiplicative adversary. Our new method is rooted in the quantum lower-bound method by Ambainis (2005, 2006), based on the analysis of eigenspaces of the density matrix. Ambainis's method is technically very complicated, it lacks intuition, and it only works for symmetric functions. Our method fits well into the adversary framework, has a simple formulation in terms of common block-diagonalization of two operators, and works for all functions. Furthermore, we prove an unconditional strong direct product theorem for the multiplicative quantum adversary bound.
The polynomial and the adversary methods are the two main tools for proving lower bounds on query complexity of quantum algorithms. Both methods have found a large number of applications, some problems more suitable for one method, some for the other. It is known though that the adversary method, in its general negative-weighted version, is tight for bounded-error quantum algorithms, whereas the polynomial method is not. By the tightness of the former, for any polynomial lower bound, there ought to exist a corresponding adversary lower bound. However, direct reduction was not known. In this paper, we give a simple and direct reduction from the polynomial method (in the form of a dual polynomial) to the adversary method. This shows that any lower bound in the form of a dual polynomial is actually an adversary lower bound of a specific form.
The polynomial and the adversary methods are the two main tools for proving lower bounds on query complexity of quantum algorithms. Both methods have found a large number of applications, some problems more suitable for one method, some for the other. It is known though that the adversary method, in its general negative-weighted version, is tight for bounded-error quantum algorithms, whereas the polynomial method is not. By the tightness of the former, for any polynomial lower bound, there ought to exist a corresponding adversary lower bound. However, direct reduction was not known. In this paper, we give a simple and direct reduction from the polynomial method (in the form of a dual polynomial) to the adversary method. This shows that any lower bound in the form of a dual polynomial is actually an adversary lower bound of a specific form.
We prove a very general lower bound technique for quantum and randomized query complexity, that is easy to prove as well as to apply. To achieve this, we introduce the use of Kolmogorov complexity to query complexity. Our technique generalizes the weighted, unweighted methods of Ambainis, and the spectral method of Barnum, Saks and Szegedy. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, adversary methods can only prove lower bounds for boolean functions fff in O(min⁡(nC0(f),nC1(f)))O(\min(\sqrt{n C_0(f)},\sqrt{n C_1(f)}))O(min(nC0​(f)​,nC1​(f)​)), where C0,C1C_0, C_1C0​,C1​ is the certificate complexity, and nnn is the size of the input. We also derive a general form of the ad hoc weighted method used by Hoyer, Neerbek and Shi to give a quantum lower bound on ordered search and sorting.