The development of quantum algorithms based on quantum versions of random walks is placed in the context of the emerging field of quantum computing. Constructing a suitable quantum version of a random walk is not trivial; pure quantum dynamics is deterministic, so randomness only enters during the measurement phase, i.e. when converting the quantum information into classical information. The outcome of a quantum random walk is very different from the corresponding classical random walk owing to the interference between the different possible paths. The upshot is that quantum walkers find themselves further from their starting point than a classical walker on average, and this forms the basis of a quantum speed up, which can be exploited to solve problems faster. Surprisingly, the effect of making the walk slightly less than perfectly quantum can optimize the properties of the quantum walk for algorithmic applications. Looking to the future, even with a small quantum computer available, the development of quantum walk algorithms might proceed more rapidly than it has, especially for solving real problems.
The development of quantum algorithms based on quantum versions of random walks is placed in the context of the emerging field of quantum computing. Constructing a suitable quantum version of a random walk is not trivial; pure quantum dynamics is deterministic, so randomness only enters during the measurement phase, i.e. when converting the quantum information into classical information. The outcome of a quantum random walk is very different from the corresponding classical random walk owing to the interference between the different possible paths. The upshot is that quantum walkers find themselves further from their starting point than a classical walker on average, and this forms the basis of a quantum speed up, which can be exploited to solve problems faster. Surprisingly, the effect of making the walk slightly less than perfectly quantum can optimize the properties of the quantum walk for algorithmic applications. Looking to the future, even with a small quantum computer available, the development of quantum walk algorithms might proceed more rapidly than it has, especially for solving real problems.
Abstract A random walk is one of the widely adopted random processes for simulation and approximation in multiple areas of science and engineering. Quantum random walk is an analog version of the classical random walk. It was first introduced in 1993 by Y. Aharonov et al. They presented that, with the nature of quantum characteristic, the average length of the walking path on a line is possible to larger than a classical random walk can produce. Therefore, the quantum random walk can be used as a tool to construct many other quantum algorithms. Moreover, it can solve graph problems that many real-world problems can be formulated. However, quantum algorithms are only useful in practice if we can implement them efficiently on a quantum computer. In this study, we are then interested in designing and implementing a quantum circuit that can be run on a real quantum computing device. We firstly focus on the most straightforward, which is a one-dimension, quantum random walk algorithm. Then, the quantum circuits are developed and implemented on a real quantum computer and a quantum computing simulator using software development kits provided by IBM. Lastly, the performance and results of the quantum circuits tested on both computing platforms are presented.
This article aims to provide an introductory survey on quantum random walks. Starting from a physical effect to illustrate the main ideas we will introduce quantum random walks, review some of their properties and outline their striking differences to classical walks. We will touch upon both physical effects and computer science applications, introducing some of the main concepts and language of present day quantum information science in this context. We will mention recent developments in this new area and outline some open questions. 1. Overview Ever since the discovery of quantum mechanics people have been puzzled by the counter-intuitive character of the laws of nature. Over time we have learned to accept more and more effects that are unimaginable in a classical Newtonian world. Modern technology exploits quantum effects both to our benefit and detriment—among the memorable examples we should cite laser technology and not omit the atomic bomb. In recent years interest in quantum information theory has been generated by the prospect of employing its laws to design devices of surprising power [1]. New ideas include quantum cryptography [2, 3] and quantum computation. In 1994 Shor [4] discovered a quantum algorithm to factor numbers efficiently (that is in time that grows only polynomically with the length of the number to be factored). This has unleashed a wave of activity across a broad range of disciplines: physics, computer science, mathematics and engineering. This fruitful axis of research has uncovered many new effects that are strikingly different from their classical counterparts, both from the physical point of view as well as from a computer science and communication theory perspective. Over time these communities have gained a greater understanding of the concepts and notions of the other. The idea that information cannot be separated from
In the world of computational probing, random walks and quantum walks are two separate but tightly linked paradigms. Classical stochastic processes like random walks are based on the random movement of particles in mathematical space and have been extensively used in data mining, network analysis, computer vision, etc. Quantum walks, by contrast generalize random walks into the quantum realm, taking the benefit of the quantum superposition and interference in order to investigate multiple paths at the same time. Quantum walks provide significant potential for algorithmic development: in quantum computing and communication, and in Scientific modelling and simulation. This paper provides an in-depth survey of random walks and quantum walks, outlining historical context, fundamental principles, applications, challenges, and future prospects. In this paper, motivated by the abstractness of both random walks and quantum walks, we survey the field of computational exploration at large scales, coalescing the myriad notions and difficult challenges addressed by existing research efforts on random and quantum walks, inferring a nuanced and multifaceted view on how both random walks and quantum walks are involved in paving the way to future development in many fields.
Using numerical simulation, we measured the performance of several potential quantum algorithms, based on quantum random walks, to solve Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems. We develop the fundamentals of quantum computing and the theory of classical algorithms to indicate how these algorithms could be implemented. We also discuss the development of quantum random walks and the principles that go into creating them, presenting existing work on search algorithms using coined discrete-time quantum random walks. Although our quantum algorithms do not solve SAT problems faster than may be done classically, as a step toward that objective, we present the first example of a quantum walk on a directed graph that has a significant increase in speed over the analogous classical walk.
The development of quantum walks in the context of quantum computation, as generalisations of random walk techniques, has led rapidly to several new quantum algorithms. These all follow a unitary quantum evolution, apart from the final measurement. Since logical qubits in a quantum computer must be protected from decoherence by error correction, there is no need to consider decoherence at the level of algorithms. Nonetheless, enlarging the range of quantum dynamics to include non-unitary evolution provides a wider range of possibilities for tuning the properties of quantum walks. For example, small amounts of decoherence in a quantum walk on the line can produce more uniform spreading (a top-hat distribution), without losing the quantum speed up. This paper reviews the work on decoherence, and more generally on non-unitary evolution, in quantum walks and suggests what future questions might prove interesting to pursue in this area.
The development of quantum walks in the context of quantum computation, as generalisations of random walk techniques, led rapidly to several new quantum algorithms. These all follow unitary quantum evolution, apart from the final measurement. Since logical qubits in a quantum computer must be protected from decoherence by error correction, there is no need to consider decoherence at the level of algorithms. Nonetheless, enlarging the range of quantum dynamics to include non-unitary evolution provides a wider range of possibilities for tuning the properties of quantum walks. For example, small amounts of decoherence in a quantum walk on the line can produce more uniform spreading (a top-hat distribution), without losing the quantum speed up. This paper reviews the work on decoherence, and more generally on non-unitary evolution, in quantum walks and suggests what future questions might prove interesting to pursue in this area.