Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0608203 · Physics Letters A

Geometric phase and quantum phase transition in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model

H. T. Cui, Kai Li, X. X. Yi

Published Aug 25, 2006• 27 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2006.08.040

Related papers

Exact solutions and dynamical phase transitions in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model with dual nonlinear interactions

Dongyang Yu

arXiv:2310.14244•Annals of Physics•Jan 10, 2026•1 citation

Ground state phase transitions in multilevel extensions of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model

Robert Gilmore, D.H. Feng

Physics Letters B•Aug 1, 1979•15 citations

Observation of a Dynamical Phase Transition in a Quantum Simulator of Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Model using Bosonic Gases

Anjun Chu, J. Will, J. Arlt +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2021•0 citations

Quantum critical dynamics of a qubit coupled to an isotropic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick bath

H. T. Quan, Z. D. Wang, C. P. Sun

We explore a dynamic signature of quantum phase transition (QPT) in an isotropic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model by studying the time evolution of a central qubit coupled to it. We evaluate exactly the time-dependent purity, which can be used to measure quantum coherence, of the central qubit. It is found that distinctly different behaviors of the purity as a function of the parameter reveal clearly the QPT point in the system. It is also clarified that the present model is equivalent to an anti--Jaynes-Cummings model under certain conditions.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702268•Physical Review A•Jul 9, 2007•33 citations

Dynamical properties across a quantum phase transition in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model

Paolo Solinas, Pedro Ribeiro, Rémy Mosseri

It is of high interest, in the context of adiabatic quantum computation, to better understand the complex dynamics of a quantum system subject to a time-dependent Hamiltonian, when driven across a quantum phase transition. We present here such a study in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model with one variable parameter. We first display numerical results on the dynamical evolution across the LMG quantum phase transition, which clearly shows a pronounced effect of the spectral avoided level crossings. We then derive a phenomenological (classical) transition model, which already shows some closeness to the numerical results. Finally, we show how a simplified quantum transition model can be built which strongly improve the classical approach, and shed light on the physical processes involved in the whole LMG quantum evolution. From our results, we argue that the commonly used description in term of Landau-Zener transitions is not appropriate for our model.

arXiv:0807.0703•Physical Review A•Nov 18, 2008•25 citations

The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems

Arno Böhm, Ali Mostafazadeh, Hiroyasu Koizumi +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•426 citations
We explore a dynamic signature of quantum phase transition (QPT) in an isotropic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model by studying the time evolution of a central qubit coupled to it. We evaluate exactly the time-dependent purity, which can be used to measure quantum coherence, of the central qubit. It is found that distinctly different behaviors of the purity as a function of the parameter reveal clearly the QPT point in the system. It is also clarified that the present model is equivalent to an anti--Jaynes-Cummings model under certain conditions.
It is of high interest, in the context of adiabatic quantum computation, to better understand the complex dynamics of a quantum system subject to a time-dependent Hamiltonian, when driven across a quantum phase transition. We present here such a study in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model with one variable parameter. We first display numerical results on the dynamical evolution across the LMG quantum phase transition, which clearly shows a pronounced effect of the spectral avoided level crossings. We then derive a phenomenological (classical) transition model, which already shows some closeness to the numerical results. Finally, we show how a simplified quantum transition model can be built which strongly improve the classical approach, and shed light on the physical processes involved in the whole LMG quantum evolution. From our results, we argue that the commonly used description in term of Landau-Zener transitions is not appropriate for our model.