Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0608190 · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Subjective probability and quantum certainty

Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs, Rüdiger Schack

Published May 10, 2007• 175 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.10.007

Related papers

Quantum Probabilities Are Objective Degrees of Epistemic Justification

Philipp Berghofer

QBism is currently one of the most widely discussed 'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. Its key move is to say that quantum probabilities are personalist Bayesian probabilities and that the quantum state represents subjective degrees of belief. Even probability-one predictions are considered subjective assignments expressing the agent's highest possible degree of certainty about what they will experience next. For most philosophers and physicists this means that QBism is simply too subjective. Even those who agree with QBism that the wave function should not be reified and that we should look for alternatives to standard Psi-ontic interpretations often argue that QBism must be abandoned because it detaches science from objectivity. The problem is that from the QBist perspective it is hard to see how objectivity could enter science. In this paper, I introduce and motivate an interpretation of quantum mechanics that takes QBism as a starting point, is consistent with all its virtues, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go. This is the view that quantum probabilities should be understood as objective degrees of epistemic justification.

arXiv:2410.19175•Oct 24, 2024•1 citation

A Subjective Approach to Quantum Probability

Ehud Lehrer A, Eran Shmaya

•Jan 1, 2005•8 citations

Estimating the Shannon Entropy and (Un)certainty Relations for Design-Structured POVMs

Alexey E. Rastegin

Complementarity relations between various characterizations of a probability distribution are at the core of information theory. In particular, lower and upper bounds for the entropic function are of great importance. In applied topics, we often deal with situations where the sums of certain powers of probabilities are known. The main question is how to convert the imposed restrictions into two-sided estimates on the Shannon entropy. It is addressed in two different ways. The more intuitive of them is based on truncated expansions of the Taylor type. Another method is based on the use of coefficients of the shifted Chebyshev polynomials. We propose here a family of polynomials for estimating the Shannon entropy from below. As a result, estimates are more uniform in the sense that errors do not become too large in particular points. The presented method is used for deriving uncertainty and certainty relations for positive operator-valued measures assigned to a quantum design. Quantum designs are currently the subject of active researches due to potential use in quantum information science. It is shown that the derived estimates are applicable in quantum tomography and detecting steerability of quantum states.

arXiv:2009.13187•SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics•Jun 1, 2022•10 citations

Decision Making and Quantum Probability

WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE) eBooks•Jul 7, 2017•0 citations

11 Indifference principles and quantum mechanics

Michael G. Titelbaum

Abstract Adam Elga argues that in certain cases when an agent cannot tell which of many subjectively indistinguishable experiences she is currently having, she should assign equal credence to being in each. This chapter derives instances of that indifference principle from the Certainty-Loss Framework (CLF) proposed and defended in this book, then defends those instances against criticisms from Brian Weatherson. Next, the chapter applies CLF to cases involving personal fission or cloning. Finally, the chapter uses CLF to examine how agents should assign degrees of belief to the outcomes of various quantum experiments if the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics is true. If the Everettian interpretation can make sense of nonextreme degrees of belief about quantum outcomes to begin with, then CLF provides plausible results about how those degrees of belief should update over time.

•Dec 20, 2012•0 citations

Quantum and Contextual Probability

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Feb 28, 2016•0 citations
QBism is currently one of the most widely discussed 'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. Its key move is to say that quantum probabilities are personalist Bayesian probabilities and that the quantum state represents subjective degrees of belief. Even probability-one predictions are considered subjective assignments expressing the agent's highest possible degree of certainty about what they will experience next. For most philosophers and physicists this means that QBism is simply too subjective. Even those who agree with QBism that the wave function should not be reified and that we should look for alternatives to standard Psi-ontic interpretations often argue that QBism must be abandoned because it detaches science from objectivity. The problem is that from the QBist perspective it is hard to see how objectivity could enter science. In this paper, I introduce and motivate an interpretation of quantum mechanics that takes QBism as a starting point, is consistent with all its virtues, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go. This is the view that quantum probabilities should be understood as objective degrees of epistemic justification.
Complementarity relations between various characterizations of a probability distribution are at the core of information theory. In particular, lower and upper bounds for the entropic function are of great importance. In applied topics, we often deal with situations where the sums of certain powers of probabilities are known. The main question is how to convert the imposed restrictions into two-sided estimates on the Shannon entropy. It is addressed in two different ways. The more intuitive of them is based on truncated expansions of the Taylor type. Another method is based on the use of coefficients of the shifted Chebyshev polynomials. We propose here a family of polynomials for estimating the Shannon entropy from below. As a result, estimates are more uniform in the sense that errors do not become too large in particular points. The presented method is used for deriving uncertainty and certainty relations for positive operator-valued measures assigned to a quantum design. Quantum designs are currently the subject of active researches due to potential use in quantum information science. It is shown that the derived estimates are applicable in quantum tomography and detecting steerability of quantum states.
Abstract Adam Elga argues that in certain cases when an agent cannot tell which of many subjectively indistinguishable experiences she is currently having, she should assign equal credence to being in each. This chapter derives instances of that indifference principle from the Certainty-Loss Framework (CLF) proposed and defended in this book, then defends those instances against criticisms from Brian Weatherson. Next, the chapter applies CLF to cases involving personal fission or cloning. Finally, the chapter uses CLF to examine how agents should assign degrees of belief to the outcomes of various quantum experiments if the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics is true. If the Everettian interpretation can make sense of nonextreme degrees of belief about quantum outcomes to begin with, then CLF provides plausible results about how those degrees of belief should update over time.