Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0608067 · New Journal of Physics

When are correlations quantum?—verification and quantification of entanglement by simple measurements

K M R Audenaert, Martin Bodo Plenio

Published Nov 8, 2006• 112 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The verification and quantification of experimentally created entanglement by simple measurements, especially between distant particles, is an important basic task in quantum processing. When composite systems are subjected to local measurements the measurement data will exhibit correlations, whether these systems are classical or quantum. Therefore, the observation of correlations in the classical measurement record does not automatically imply the presence of quantum correlations in the system under investigation. In this study, we explore the question of when correlations, or other measurement data, are sufficient to guarantee the existence of a certain amount of quantum correlations in the system and when additional information, such as the degree of purity of the system, is needed to do so. Various measurement settings are discussed, both numerically and analytically. Exact results and lower bounds on the least entanglement consistent with the observations are presented. The approach is suitable both for the bi-partite and the multi-partite setting.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/8/11/266

Related papers

When are correlations quantum

Katrien Audenaert, Martin Bodo Plenio

The verification of experimentally created entanglement, especially between distant particles, is an important basic task in quantum processing. When composite systems are subjected to local measurements the measurement data will exhibit correlations, whether these systems are classical or quantum. Therefore, the observation of correlations in the classical measurement record does not automatically imply the presence of quantum correlations in the system under investigation. In this work we explore the question when correlations are sufficient to guarantee the existence of quantum correlations in the system and when additional information is needed to do so, such as the degree of purity of the system. Various measurement settings are discussed, both numerically and analytically. Exact results and lower bounds on the least entanglement consistent with the observations are presented. The approach is suitable both for the bi-partite and the multi-partite setting.

•Aug 8, 2006•4 citations

Measuring correlations in quantum and statistical systems

V. I. Yukalov, E. P. Yukalova

The survey discusses the problem of measuring correlations in composite quantum and statistical systems. After briefly recalling the standard methods of describing correlations, the emphasis is on the method of correlation indices. The latter method for quantifying the strength of correlations in composite physical systems is sufficiently general allowing for measuring in a unique way the correlation strength in both quantum and statistical systems, for static as well as for dynamic processes. The correlation indices, can be defined for correlation operators, reduced density matrices, and other operators containing information on correlations in the studied composite systems. The correlation indices measure all types of correlations, quantum correlations, such as entanglement, as well as classical correlations. They are applicable for characterizing static as well as dynamical processes. Examples are given of correlation indices for several quantum states and for spin and pseudospin systems. The quantification of correlations in a nonequilibrium system is exemplified by calculating the correlation index for a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate subject to the action of an alternating field.

quant-pharXiv:2609.18412•Laser Physics Letters•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations

On measures of quantum entanglement — A brief review

Debasis Sarkar

Entanglement is one of the most useful resources in quantum information processing. It is effectively the quantum correlation between different subsystems of a composite system. Mathematically, one of the most hard tasks in quantum mechanics is to quantify entanglement. However, progress in this field is remarkable but not complete yet. There are many things to do with quantification of entanglement. In this review, we will discuss some of the important measures of bipartite entanglement.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Aug 18, 2016•1 citation

Complete Characterization of Quantum Correlations by Randomized Measurements

Nikolai Wyderka, Andreas Ketterer, Satoya Imai +5 more

The fact that quantum mechanics predicts stronger correlations than classical physics is an essential cornerstone of quantum information processing. Indeed, these quantum correlations are a valuable resource for various tasks, such as quantum key distribution or quantum teleportation, but characterizing these correlations in an experimental setting is a formidable task, especially in scenarios where no shared reference frames are available. By definition, quantum correlations are reference-frame independent, i.e., invariant under local transformations; this physically motivated invariance implies, however, a dedicated mathematical structure and, therefore, constitutes a roadblock for an efficient analysis of these correlations in experiments. Here we provide a method to directly measure any locally invariant property of quantum states using locally randomized measurements, and we present a detailed toolbox to analyze these correlations for two quantum bits. We implement these methods experimentally using pairs of entangled photons, characterizing their usefulness for quantum teleportation and their potential to display quantum nonlocality in its simplest form. Our results can be applied to various quantum computing platforms, allowing simple analysis of correlations between arbitrary distant qubits in the architecture.

arXiv:2212.07894•Physical Review Letters•Aug 28, 2023•23 citations

Entanglement and Its Verification: A Tutorial on Classical and Quantum Correlations

Enno Giese

Entanglement, a defining property of quantum mechanics in which two physical subsystems cannot be seen as independent entities, challenges our everyday experience and classical intuition. However, only such strong quantum correlations enable quantum technologies, including quantum computing or communication, while revealing the limits of our classical worldview by violating local realism. Given its importance in modern quantum science, we present this tutorial addressing the questions: What is entanglement, how does it differ from classical correlations, and how can it be experimentally verified? Using celebrated examples, such as Schrödinger's cat, we highlight the distinction between classical and quantum correlations and illustrate the definition of entangled and separable states. We review entanglement criteria by discussing Heisenberg-type uncertainty relations for continuous variables and the CHSH inequality for discrete systems. Focusing on concepts of quantum correlations and operational entanglement witnesses, we provide accessible tools and illustrative examples aimed at demystifying entanglement for a broad readership.

quant-pharXiv:2511.09507•Nov 13, 2025•0 citations

Efficient verification of quantum resources

Harald Wunderlich

In this thesis we present methods to efficiently verify quantum many-body experiments. The first part focuses on the quantitative verification of graph state experiments from simple measurements. In particular, optimal bounds on the fidelity, purity and entropy from stabilizer measurements are derived as well as high-quality bounds on entanglement measures. Furthermore, we show how entanglement may be quantified in spin and cold atom many-body systems using standard experimental techniques only. The scheme requires no assumptions on the state in the laboratory, and a lower bound to the entanglement can be read off directly from the scattering cross section of neutrons deflected from solid state samples or the time-of-flight distribution of cold atoms in optical lattices, respectively. Quantum mechanics offers many interesting properties such as entanglement and non-locality. However, one can easily think of more general correlations than quantum correlations. This gives rise to the question if quantum correlations are the most general allowed in nature? In the last part we propose a new axiom we call macroscopic locality. The idea behind this axiom is that any physical theory should recover classical physics in the continuum limit (i.e., when a large number of particles is involved and our measurement devices fail to resolve discrete particles). We will show that this very intuitive axiom, together with the no-signaling principle, allows to recover many important results in quantum mechanics, like the universality of the Tsirelson bound, or the set of accessible two-point correlators. Moreover, we will provide a complete characterization of the correlations between two distant physical systems that arise out of both axioms and comment on its consistency.

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations
The verification and quantification of experimentally created entanglement by simple measurements, especially between distant particles, is an important basic task in quantum processing. When composite systems are subjected to local measurements the measurement data will exhibit correlations, whether these systems are classical or quantum. Therefore, the observation of correlations in the classical measurement record does not automatically imply the presence of quantum correlations in the system under investigation. In this study, we explore the question of when correlations, or other measurement data, are sufficient to guarantee the existence of a certain amount of quantum correlations in the system and when additional information, such as the degree of purity of the system, is needed to do so. Various measurement settings are discussed, both numerically and analytically. Exact results and lower bounds on the least entanglement consistent with the observations are presented. The approach is suitable both for the bi-partite and the multi-partite setting.
The verification of experimentally created entanglement, especially between distant particles, is an important basic task in quantum processing. When composite systems are subjected to local measurements the measurement data will exhibit correlations, whether these systems are classical or quantum. Therefore, the observation of correlations in the classical measurement record does not automatically imply the presence of quantum correlations in the system under investigation. In this work we explore the question when correlations are sufficient to guarantee the existence of quantum correlations in the system and when additional information is needed to do so, such as the degree of purity of the system. Various measurement settings are discussed, both numerically and analytically. Exact results and lower bounds on the least entanglement consistent with the observations are presented. The approach is suitable both for the bi-partite and the multi-partite setting.
The survey discusses the problem of measuring correlations in composite quantum and statistical systems. After briefly recalling the standard methods of describing correlations, the emphasis is on the method of correlation indices. The latter method for quantifying the strength of correlations in composite physical systems is sufficiently general allowing for measuring in a unique way the correlation strength in both quantum and statistical systems, for static as well as for dynamic processes. The correlation indices, can be defined for correlation operators, reduced density matrices, and other operators containing information on correlations in the studied composite systems. The correlation indices measure all types of correlations, quantum correlations, such as entanglement, as well as classical correlations. They are applicable for characterizing static as well as dynamical processes. Examples are given of correlation indices for several quantum states and for spin and pseudospin systems. The quantification of correlations in a nonequilibrium system is exemplified by calculating the correlation index for a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate subject to the action of an alternating field.
The fact that quantum mechanics predicts stronger correlations than classical physics is an essential cornerstone of quantum information processing. Indeed, these quantum correlations are a valuable resource for various tasks, such as quantum key distribution or quantum teleportation, but characterizing these correlations in an experimental setting is a formidable task, especially in scenarios where no shared reference frames are available. By definition, quantum correlations are reference-frame independent, i.e., invariant under local transformations; this physically motivated invariance implies, however, a dedicated mathematical structure and, therefore, constitutes a roadblock for an efficient analysis of these correlations in experiments. Here we provide a method to directly measure any locally invariant property of quantum states using locally randomized measurements, and we present a detailed toolbox to analyze these correlations for two quantum bits. We implement these methods experimentally using pairs of entangled photons, characterizing their usefulness for quantum teleportation and their potential to display quantum nonlocality in its simplest form. Our results can be applied to various quantum computing platforms, allowing simple analysis of correlations between arbitrary distant qubits in the architecture.
Entanglement, a defining property of quantum mechanics in which two physical subsystems cannot be seen as independent entities, challenges our everyday experience and classical intuition. However, only such strong quantum correlations enable quantum technologies, including quantum computing or communication, while revealing the limits of our classical worldview by violating local realism. Given its importance in modern quantum science, we present this tutorial addressing the questions: What is entanglement, how does it differ from classical correlations, and how can it be experimentally verified? Using celebrated examples, such as Schrödinger's cat, we highlight the distinction between classical and quantum correlations and illustrate the definition of entangled and separable states. We review entanglement criteria by discussing Heisenberg-type uncertainty relations for continuous variables and the CHSH inequality for discrete systems. Focusing on concepts of quantum correlations and operational entanglement witnesses, we provide accessible tools and illustrative examples aimed at demystifying entanglement for a broad readership.
In this thesis we present methods to efficiently verify quantum many-body experiments. The first part focuses on the quantitative verification of graph state experiments from simple measurements. In particular, optimal bounds on the fidelity, purity and entropy from stabilizer measurements are derived as well as high-quality bounds on entanglement measures. Furthermore, we show how entanglement may be quantified in spin and cold atom many-body systems using standard experimental techniques only. The scheme requires no assumptions on the state in the laboratory, and a lower bound to the entanglement can be read off directly from the scattering cross section of neutrons deflected from solid state samples or the time-of-flight distribution of cold atoms in optical lattices, respectively. Quantum mechanics offers many interesting properties such as entanglement and non-locality. However, one can easily think of more general correlations than quantum correlations. This gives rise to the question if quantum correlations are the most general allowed in nature? In the last part we propose a new axiom we call macroscopic locality. The idea behind this axiom is that any physical theory should recover classical physics in the continuum limit (i.e., when a large number of particles is involved and our measurement devices fail to resolve discrete particles). We will show that this very intuitive axiom, together with the no-signaling principle, allows to recover many important results in quantum mechanics, like the universality of the Tsirelson bound, or the set of accessible two-point correlators. Moreover, we will provide a complete characterization of the correlations between two distant physical systems that arise out of both axioms and comment on its consistency.