We create a variety of new quantum algorithms that use Grover's algorithm and similar techniques to give polynomial speedups over their classical counterparts. We begin by introducing a set of tools that carefully minimize the impact of errors on running time; those tools provide us with speedups to already-published quantum algorithms, such as improving Durr, Heiligman, Hoyer and Mhalla's algorithm for single-source shortest paths [quant-ph/0401091] by a factor of lg N. The algorithms we construct from scratch have a range of speedups, from O(E)->O(sqrt(VE lg V)) speedups in graph theory to an O(N^3)->O(N^2) speedup in dynamic programming.
We create a variety of new quantum algorithms that use Grover's algorithm and similar techniques to give polynomial speedups over their classical counterparts. We begin by introducing a set of tools that carefully minimize the impact of errors on running time; those tools provide us with speedups to already-published quantum algorithms, such as improving Durr, Heiligman, Hoyer and Mhalla's algorithm for single-source shortest paths [quant-ph/0401091] by a factor of lg N. The algorithms we construct from scratch have a range of speedups, from O(E)->O(sqrt(VE lg V)) speedups in graph theory to an O(N^3)->O(N^2) speedup in dynamic programming.
This thesis’ aim is to explore improvements to, and applications of, a fundamental quantum algorithm invented by Grover. Grover’s algorithm is a basic tool that can be applied to a large number of problems in computer science, creating quantum algorithms that are polynomially faster than fastest known and fastest possible classical algorithms that solve the same problems. Our goal in this thesis is to make these techniques readily accessible to those without a strong background in quantum physics: we achieve this by providing a set of tools, each of which makes use of Grover’s algorithm or similar techniques, that can be used as subroutines in many quantum algorithms. The tools we provide are carefully constructed: they are easy to use, and they are asymptotically faster than the best tools previously available. The tools that we supersede include algorithms by Boyer, Brassard, Hoyer and Tapp, Buhrman, Cleve, de Witt and Zalka and Durr and Hoyer. After creating our tools, we create several new quantum algorithms, each of which is faster than the fastest known classical algorithm that accomplishes the same aim, and some of which are faster than the fastest possible classical algorithm. These algorithms come from graph theory, computational geometry and dynamic programming. We discuss a breadth-first search that is faster than (edges) (the classical limit) in a dense graph, maximum-points-on-a-line in (N3/2 lgN) (faster than the fastest classical algorithm known), as well as several other algorithms that are similarly illustrative of solutions in some class of problem. Through these new algorithms we illustrate the use of our tools, working to encourage their use and the study of quantum algorithms in general.
This paper's aim is to explore improvements to, and applications of, a fundamental quantum algorithm invented by Grover\cite{grover}. Grover's algorithm is a basic tool that can be applied to a large number of problems in computer science, creating quantum algorithms that are polynomially faster than fastest known and fastest possible classical algorithms that solve the same problems. Our goal in this paper is to make these techniques readily accessible to those without a strong background in quantum physics: we achieve this by providing a set of tools, each of which makes use of Grover's algorithm or similar techniques, which can be used as subroutines in many quantum algorithms.}{The tools we provide are carefully constructed: they are easy to use, and in many cases they are asymptotically faster than the best tools previously available. The tools we build on include algorithms by Boyer, Brassard, Hoyer and Tapp, Buhrman, Cleve, de Witt and Zalka and Durr and Hoyer.}{After creating our tools, we create several new quantum algorithms, each of which is faster than the fastest known deterministic classical algorithm that accomplishes the same aim, and some of which are faster than the fastest possible deterministic classical algorithm. These algorithms solve problems from the fields of graph theory and computational geometry, and some employ dynamic programming techniques. We discuss a breadth-first search that is faster than Θ(edges) (the classical limit) in a dense graph, maximum-points-on-a-line in O(N3/2lgN) (faster than the fastest classical algorithm known), as well as several other algorithms that are similarly illustrative of solutions in some class of problem. Through these new algorithms we illustrate the use of our tools, working to encourage their use and the study of quantum algorithms in general.
We introduce a quantum dynamic programming framework that allows us to directly extend to the quantum realm a large body of classical dynamic programming algorithms. The corresponding quantum dynamic programming algorithms retain the same space complexity as their classical counterpart, while achieving a computational speedup. For a combinatorial (search or optimization) problem P and an instance I of P, such a speedup can be expressed in terms of the average degree δ of the dependency digraph GP(I) of I, determined by a recursive formulation of P. The nodes of this graph are the subproblems of P induced by I and its arcs are directed from each subproblem to those on whose solution it relies. In particular, our framework allows us to solve the considered problems in O~(∣V(GP(I))∣δ) time. As an example, we obtain a quantum version of the Bellman-Ford algorithm for computing shortest paths from a single source vertex to all the other vertices in a weighted n-vertex digraph with m edges that runs in O~(nnm) time, which improves the best known classical upper bound when m∈Ω(n1.4).
We introduce a quantum dynamic programming framework that allows us to directly extend to the quantum realm a large body of classical dynamic programming algorithms. The corresponding quantum dynamic programming algorithms retain the same space complexity as their classical counterpart, while achieving a computational speedup. For a combinatorial (search or optimization) problem P and an instance I of P, such a speedup can be expressed in terms of the average degree δ of the dependency digraph GP(I) of I, determined by a recursive formulation of P. The nodes of this graph are the subproblems of P induced by I and its arcs are directed from each subproblem to those on whose solution it relies. In particular, our framework allows us to solve the considered problems in Õ(|V (GP(I))|√δ) time. As an example, we obtain a quantum version of the Bellman-Ford algorithm for computing shortest paths from a single source vertex to all the other vertices in a weighted n-vertex digraph with m edges that runs in Õ(n√nm) time, which improves the best known classical upper bound when m ∈ Ω(n1.4).
We provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of quantum algorithms for shortest path problems in weighted graphs, establishing complexity-theoretic foundations for quantum acceleration in this fundamental computational domain. Building upon recent quantum adaptations of classical graph algorithms, we develop a unified framework that characterizes when and why quantum approaches offer computational advantages for single-source and all-pairs shortest path computations. Our analysis encompasses both positive-weight and negative-weight scenarios, deriving conditional speedup theorems that depend on graph structure, weight distribution, and oracle access models. We prove that quantum amplitude amplification and quantum walks can provide polynomial to exponential speedups under specific structural assumptions, while establishing hardness results that identify problem instances where quantum advantage is provably absent. The theoretical framework introduces novel complexity measures that capture graph-theoretic properties relevant to quantum algorithm performance, including quantum diameter, entanglement capacity, and interference efficiency. We extend our analysis to dynamic graph scenarios where edge weights evolve over time, establishing bounds on quantum advantage preservation under graph modifications. This work contributes fundamental insights into quantum algorithmic graph theory, clarifying the boundaries of quantum computational advantage and providing theoretical guidance for algorithm design in network optimization, routing, and graph analytics applications.