The collapse of Bell determinism

Edmund Taylor Whittaker

Gilbert D West

Wilfred W. Barkas

James D. Malley

We update our paper: The collapse of Bell determinism (Physics Letters A, 359 (2006): 122-125; available online 16 June 2006). First, we point out that Olivier Brunet, using lattice theoretic methods, has recently, and quite independently, derived the core technical lemma of our paper; see: A priori knowledge and the Kochen-Specker theorem (Physics Letters A, available online 5 January 2007). He has also kindly pointed out a misstep in the last line of one of our results. We discuss the correction and comment on slightly revised notions of how Bell determinism collapses. We also correct a few typos in the original paper.

Michaël Esfeld

Mandip Singh

The nonlocal action of a measurement performed on a quantum entangled particle can determine the quantum state of a distant entangled particle instantly. Since the relativistic simultaneity of events is frame dependent therefore, a physically valid question arises, does the nonlocal action at a distance determine the quantum state of the distant particle in its past, when quantum state collapse is observed from a different inertial frame of reference? From the relativity of simultaneity, Lorentz invariance of the quantum entangled state of photons under consideration and the validity of Bell's theorem in all inertial frames of reference, it is demonstrated that the measurement-induced collapse of a quantum entangled state also determines the quantum state of a distant photon in its past, provided one of the photons is located in the future. The past and future are defined with respect to the time of quantum state collapse in the rest frame of a quantum state measurement device.