Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0603277 · Foundations of Physics

Observables have No Value: A no-go Theorem for Position and Momentum Observables

Alberto C. de la Torre

Published May 2, 2007• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-007-9148-2

Related papers

No-Go Theorem for Modeling with Von Neumann Observables

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Physics of Non-Observables

Paul K. Suh

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 17, 2007•0 citations

A No-Go Theorem for Nonlinear Canonical Quantization

Miroslav Engliš

We want to point out the following strengthening of the classical theorem of Groenewold and van Hove: There exists no mapping Op from polynomial observables on the phase space into linear operators on which would map Poisson brackets into commutators, the position and momentum observables p and q into the usual (Schrödinger) position and momentum operators, and would obey the von Neumann rule for and . The point is that neither linearity, nor continuity etc. of Op are assumed.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Mar 15, 2002•3 citations

A No—Go Theorem for Nonlinear Canonical Quantization

MiroslayEnglis

We want to point out thc following strcngthcning of the classical theorem of Grocnewold and van Hove:There exists no ,napping Op from polynomial observables f (p, q) on the phase space R2n into linear operators on L2(Rn)which would map Poisson brackets into commutators, the position and momentum obscrvablcs p and q into the usual(Schrodinger) position and momentum operators, and would obey the yon Neumann rifle 0p(cfk) = c 0p(f)k for k = 1,2, 3and c R. The point is that neither linearity, nor continuity etc. of Op are assumed.

理论物理通讯:英文版•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Physical Observables as Operators

K. Tamvakis

Undergraduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Comment on "Continuous simultaneous measurement of position and momentum of a particle"

Adélcio C. Oliveira

In a recent paper, [Gampel, F. and Gajda, M., Phys. Rev. A 107, 012420, (2023)], the authors claimed they are proposing a new model to explain the existence of classical trajectories in the quantum domain. The idea is based on simultaneous position and momentum measurements and a "jump Markov process". Consequently, they have interpreted the emergence of classical trajectories as sets of detection events. They successfully implemented the model for a free particle and for one under a harmonic potential. Here, we show that the continuous observation limit is a realization of a coherent semiclassical expansion; Also, as has already been demonstrated, the jump process is not necessary and is not observable. In other words, the collapse, as they propose, is a non-go theorem; even if it is real, it can not be measured under the needed assumptions to obtain Newtonian classical dynamics.

arXiv:2311.06606•Nov 11, 2023•0 citations
We want to point out thc following strcngthcning of the classical theorem of Grocnewold and van Hove:There exists no ,napping Op from polynomial observables f (p, q) on the phase space R2n into linear operators on L2(Rn)which would map Poisson brackets into commutators, the position and momentum obscrvablcs p and q into the usual(Schrodinger) position and momentum operators, and would obey the yon Neumann rifle 0p(cfk) = c 0p(f)k for k = 1,2, 3and c R. The point is that neither linearity, nor continuity etc. of Op are assumed.
In a recent paper, [Gampel, F. and Gajda, M., Phys. Rev. A 107, 012420, (2023)], the authors claimed they are proposing a new model to explain the existence of classical trajectories in the quantum domain. The idea is based on simultaneous position and momentum measurements and a "jump Markov process". Consequently, they have interpreted the emergence of classical trajectories as sets of detection events. They successfully implemented the model for a free particle and for one under a harmonic potential. Here, we show that the continuous observation limit is a realization of a coherent semiclassical expansion; Also, as has already been demonstrated, the jump process is not necessary and is not observable. In other words, the collapse, as they propose, is a non-go theorem; even if it is real, it can not be measured under the needed assumptions to obtain Newtonian classical dynamics.