Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0512025 · Physical Review A

Nonlocality without inequality for almost all two-qubit entangled states based on Cabello’s nonlocality argument

Samir Kunkri, Sujit K. Choudhary, Ali Ahanj, Pramod S. Joag

Published Feb 24, 2006• 22 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Here we deal with a nonlocality argument proposed by Cabello, which is more general than Hardy's nonlocality argument, but still maximally entangled states do not respond. However, for most of the other entangled states, maximum probability of success of this argument is more than that of the Hardy's argument.
DOI
10.1103/physreva.73.022346

Related papers

Device-independent bounds from Cabello's nonlocality argument

Ashutosh Rai, Matej Pivoluska, Martin Plesch +3 more

Hardy-type arguments manifest Bell nonlocality in one of the simplest possible ways. Except for demonstrating nonclassical signature of entangled states in question, they can also serve for device-independent self-testing of states, as shown, e.g., in Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180401 (2012). Here we develop and broaden these results to an extended version of Hardy's argument, often referred to as Cabello's nonlocality argument. We show that, as in the simpler case of Hardy's nonlocality argument, the maximum quantum value for Cabello's nonlocality is achieved by a pure two-qubit state and projective measurements that are unique up to local isometries. We also examine the properties of a more realistic case when small errors in the ideal constraints are accepted within the probabilities obtained and prove that also in this case the two-qubit state and measurements are sufficient for obtaining the maximum quantum violation of the classical bound.

arXiv:2103.09919•Physical Review A•Jun 23, 2021•14 citations

Nonlocality without inequalities for almost all entangled states for two particles

Sheldon Goldstein

We provide a streamlined proof of Hardy's theorem, that almost every entangled state for a pair of quantum particles admits a ``proof of nonlocality'' without inequalities. Moreover, our analysis covers a larger class of observables. Thus we also strengthen Hardy's assertion that the argument fails for maximally entangled states, such as the singlet state. At the same time, we formulate the argument in such a manner that the relations which must be satisfied for local hidden variables are entirely deterministic, making no reference whatsoever to probability, let alone probablistic inequalities.

Physical Review Letters•Mar 28, 1994•129 citations

Bound on Hardy’s nonlocality from the principle of information causality

Ali Ahanj, Samir Kunkri, Ashutosh Rai +2 more

Recently, the principle of nonviolation of information causality [Nature 461, 1101 (2009)] has been proposed as one of the foundational properties of nature. We explore the Hardy's nonlocality theorem for two-qubit systems, in the context of generalized probability theory, restricted by the principle of nonviolation of information causality. Applying a sufficient condition for information causality violation, we derive an upper bound on the maximum success probability of Hardy's nonlocality argument. We find that the bound achieved here is higher than that allowed by quantum mechanics but still much less than what the no-signaling condition permits. We also study the Cabello type nonlocality argument (a generalization of Hardy's argument) in this context.

arXiv:0912.2232•Physical Review A•Mar 4, 2010•24 citations

Local orthogonality provides a tight upper bound for Hardy's nonlocality

Subhadipa Das, Manik Banik, Md. Rajjak Gazi +2 more

The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)]. This feature, for example, gets manifested in the amount of Bell inequality violation as well as in the degree of success probability of Hardy's (Cabello's) nonlocality argument. Physical principles like information causality and macroscopic locality have been proposed for analyzing restricted nonlocality in quantum mechanics, viz. explaining the Cirel'son bound. However, these principles are not very successful in explaining the maximum success probability of Hardy's as well as Cabello's argument in quantum theory. Here we show that a recently proposed physical principle, namely local orthogonality, does better by providing a tighter upper bound on the success probability for Hardy's nonlocality. This bound is relatively closer to the corresponding quantum value compared to the bounds achieved from other principles.

arXiv:1311.3710•Physical Review A•Dec 2, 2013•8 citations

Bell's Theorem without Inequalities and without Probabilities for Two Observers

Adán Cabello

A proof of Bell's theorem using two maximally entangled states of two qubits is presented. It exhibits a similar logical structure to Hardy's argument of "nonlocality without inequalities." However, it works for 100% of the runs of a certain experiment. Therefore, it can also be viewed as a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-like proof involving only two spacelike separated regions.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008085•Physical Review Letters•Mar 5, 2001•140 citations

Nonlocality without inequalities has not been proved for maximally entangled states

Adán Cabello

Two approaches to extend Hardy's proof of nonlocality without inequalities to maximally entangled states of bipartite two-level systems are shown to fail. On one hand, it is shown that the proof of Wu and co-workers [Phys. Rev. A 53, R1927 (1996)] uses an effective state which is not maximally entangled. On the other hand, it is demonstrated that Hardy's proof cannot be generalized by the replacement of one of the four von Neumann measurements involved in the original proof by a generalized measurement to unambiguously discriminate between nonorthogonal states.

arXiv:quant-ph/9911023•Physical Review A•Jan 18, 2000•7 citations
Hardy-type arguments manifest Bell nonlocality in one of the simplest possible ways. Except for demonstrating nonclassical signature of entangled states in question, they can also serve for device-independent self-testing of states, as shown, e.g., in Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180401 (2012). Here we develop and broaden these results to an extended version of Hardy's argument, often referred to as Cabello's nonlocality argument. We show that, as in the simpler case of Hardy's nonlocality argument, the maximum quantum value for Cabello's nonlocality is achieved by a pure two-qubit state and projective measurements that are unique up to local isometries. We also examine the properties of a more realistic case when small errors in the ideal constraints are accepted within the probabilities obtained and prove that also in this case the two-qubit state and measurements are sufficient for obtaining the maximum quantum violation of the classical bound.
We provide a streamlined proof of Hardy's theorem, that almost every entangled state for a pair of quantum particles admits a ``proof of nonlocality'' without inequalities. Moreover, our analysis covers a larger class of observables. Thus we also strengthen Hardy's assertion that the argument fails for maximally entangled states, such as the singlet state. At the same time, we formulate the argument in such a manner that the relations which must be satisfied for local hidden variables are entirely deterministic, making no reference whatsoever to probability, let alone probablistic inequalities.
Recently, the principle of nonviolation of information causality [Nature 461, 1101 (2009)] has been proposed as one of the foundational properties of nature. We explore the Hardy's nonlocality theorem for two-qubit systems, in the context of generalized probability theory, restricted by the principle of nonviolation of information causality. Applying a sufficient condition for information causality violation, we derive an upper bound on the maximum success probability of Hardy's nonlocality argument. We find that the bound achieved here is higher than that allowed by quantum mechanics but still much less than what the no-signaling condition permits. We also study the Cabello type nonlocality argument (a generalization of Hardy's argument) in this context.
The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)]. This feature, for example, gets manifested in the amount of Bell inequality violation as well as in the degree of success probability of Hardy's (Cabello's) nonlocality argument. Physical principles like information causality and macroscopic locality have been proposed for analyzing restricted nonlocality in quantum mechanics, viz. explaining the Cirel'son bound. However, these principles are not very successful in explaining the maximum success probability of Hardy's as well as Cabello's argument in quantum theory. Here we show that a recently proposed physical principle, namely local orthogonality, does better by providing a tighter upper bound on the success probability for Hardy's nonlocality. This bound is relatively closer to the corresponding quantum value compared to the bounds achieved from other principles.
Two approaches to extend Hardy's proof of nonlocality without inequalities to maximally entangled states of bipartite two-level systems are shown to fail. On one hand, it is shown that the proof of Wu and co-workers [Phys. Rev. A 53, R1927 (1996)] uses an effective state which is not maximally entangled. On the other hand, it is demonstrated that Hardy's proof cannot be generalized by the replacement of one of the four von Neumann measurements involved in the original proof by a generalized measurement to unambiguously discriminate between nonorthogonal states.