Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0512011 · Modern Physics Letters A

ON SERIES OF MULTIQUBIT BELL'S INEQUALITIES

Tomasz Paterek, Wiesław Laskowski, Marek Żukowski

Published Jan 20, 2006• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We review series of multiqubit Bell's inequalities which apply to correlation functions and present conditions that quantum states must satisfy to violate such inequalities.
DOI
10.1142/s0217732306019414

Related papers

Experimentally Testable State-Independent Violation of Bell-Type Inequalities for Quantum Contextuality

Adán Cabello

There are experimentally testable correlation Bell inequalities which are satisfied by any noncontextual theory but are violated by any quantum state. We discuss how to test one of them.

International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies (ICQNM)•Feb 1, 2009•0 citations

The Bell Inequalities: Identifying What Is Testable and What Is Not

Louis Sica

The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.

arXiv:1903.02116•Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2020•9 citations

Unconditional Quantum Correlations do not Violate Bell’s Inequality

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

arXiv:1503.08016•Foundations of Physics•Jul 3, 2015•2 citations

A BELL INEQUALITY BASED ON CORRELATION FUNCTIONS FOR THREE QUBITS

Chunfeng Wu, Jing‐Ling Chen, L. C. Kwek +1 more

•Oct 1, 2005•0 citations

SPIN-PARITY EFFECT IN VIOLATION OF BELL'S INEQUALITIES

Zhigang Song, J.-Q. Liang, L. F. Wei

Analytic formulas of Bell correlations are derived in terms of quantum probability statistics under the assumption of measuring outcome-independence and the Bell's inequalities (BIs) are extended to general bipartite-entanglement macroscopic quantum-states (MQS) of arbitrary spins. For a spin-½ entangled state we find analytically that the violations of BIs really resulted from the quantum nonlocal correlations. However, the BIs are always satisfied for the spin-1 entangled MQS. More generally the quantum nonlocality does not lead to the violation for the integer spins since the nonlocal interference effects cancel each other by the quantum statistical-average. Such a cancellation no longer exists for the half-integer spins due to the nontrivial Berry phase, and thus the violation of BIs is understood remarkably as an effect of geometric phase. Specifically, our generic observation of the spin-parity effect can be experimentally tested with the entangled photon-pairs.

Modern Physics Letters B•Dec 18, 2013•5 citations

Simple conditions constraining the set of quantum correlations

Julio I. de Vicente

Simple, analytical conditions for constraining the set of bipartite correlations allowed by quantum mechanics are proposed and exemplified, with applications in building Bell inequalities that can test violations of local reality in quantum-mechanical systems.

arXiv:1502.01876•Physical Review A•Sep 4, 2015•13 citations
The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.
Analytic formulas of Bell correlations are derived in terms of quantum probability statistics under the assumption of measuring outcome-independence and the Bell's inequalities (BIs) are extended to general bipartite-entanglement macroscopic quantum-states (MQS) of arbitrary spins. For a spin-½ entangled state we find analytically that the violations of BIs really resulted from the quantum nonlocal correlations. However, the BIs are always satisfied for the spin-1 entangled MQS. More generally the quantum nonlocality does not lead to the violation for the integer spins since the nonlocal interference effects cancel each other by the quantum statistical-average. Such a cancellation no longer exists for the half-integer spins due to the nontrivial Berry phase, and thus the violation of BIs is understood remarkably as an effect of geometric phase. Specifically, our generic observation of the spin-parity effect can be experimentally tested with the entangled photon-pairs.