Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0510205

Quantum key distribution using superposition of the vacuum and single photon states

Jae Weon Lee, Jaewan Kim, Yong Wook Cheong, Hai-Woong Lee, Eok Kyun Lee

Published Oct 27, 2005• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

B92-type and BB84-type quantum cryptography schemes using superposed states of the vacuum and single particle states which are robust against PNS attacks are studied. The number of securely transferred classical bits per particle (not per qubit) sent in these schemes is calculated and found to have upper bounds. Possible experimental realizations using the cavity QED or linear optics are suggested.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0510205

Related papers

Quantum Key Distribution Using Vacuum-One-Photon Qubits: Maximum Number of Transferable Bits per Particle

Su-Yong Lee, Se-Wan Ji, Hai-Woong Lee +2 more

Quantum key distribution schemes which employ encoding on vacuum-one-photon qubits are capable of transferring more information bits per particle than the standard schemes employing polarization or phase coding. We calculate the maximum number of classical bits per particle that can be securely transferred when the key distribution is performed with the BB84 and B92 protocols, respectively, using the vacuum-one-photon qubits. In particular, we show that for a generalized B92 protocol with the vacuum-one-photon qubits, a maximum of two bits per particle can be securely transferred. We also demonstrate the advantage brought about by performing a generalized measurement that is optimized for unambiguous discrimination of the encoded states: the parameter range where the transfer of two bits per particle can be achieved is dramatically enhanced as compared to the corresponding parameter range of projective measurements.

arXiv:0907.3393•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Aug 28, 2009•10 citations

Security of two quantum cryptography protocols using the same four qubit states

Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Gisin, Barbara Kraus +1 more

The first quantum cryptography protocol, proposed by Bennett and Brassard in 1984 (BB84), has been widely studied in recent years. This protocol uses four states (more precisely, two complementary bases) for the encoding of the classical bit. Recently, it has been noticed that by using the same four states, but a different encoding of information, one can define a protocol which is more robust in practical implementations, specifically when attenuated laser pulses are used instead of single-photon sources [V. Scarani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057901 (2004), referred to as the SARG04 protocol]. We present a detailed study of SARG04 in two different regimes. In the first part, we consider an implementation with a single-photon source: we derive bounds on the error rate $Q$ for security against all possible attacks by the eavesdropper. The lower and the upper bound obtained for SARG04 ($Q\ensuremath{\lesssim}10.95%$ and $Q\ensuremath{\gtrsim}14.9%$, respectively) are close to those obtained for BB84 ($Q\ensuremath{\lesssim}12.4%$ and $Q\ensuremath{\gtrsim}14.6%$, respectively). In the second part, we consider a realistic source consisting of an attenuated laser and improve on previous analysis by allowing Alice to optimize the mean number of photons as a function of the distance. The SARG04 protocol is found to perform better than BB84, both in secret-key rate and in maximal achievable distance, for a wide class of Eve's attacks.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505035•Physical Review A•Sep 1, 2005•146 citations

Quantum Cryptography Protocol Based on Sending Entangled Qubit Pairs

Olli Ahonen

The quantum key distribution protocol BB84, published by C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard in 1984, describes how two spatially separated parties can generate a random bit string fully known only to them by transmission of single-qubit quantum states. Any attempt to eavesdrop on the protocol introduces disturbance which can be detected by the legitimate parties. In this Master's Thesis a novel modification to the BB84 protocol is analyzed. Instead of sending single particles one-by-one as in BB84, they are grouped and a non-local transformation is applied to each group before transmission. Each particle is sent to the intended receiver, always delaying the transmission until the receiver has acknowledged the previous particle on an authenticated classical channel, restricting eavesdropping to accessing the quantum transmission one particle at a time. Hence, an eavesdropper cannot undo the non-local transformation perfectly. Even if perfect cloning of quantum states was possible the state of the group could not be cloned. We calculate the maximal information on the established key provided by an intercept-resend attack and the induced disturbance for different transformations. We observe that it is possible to significantly reduce the eavesdropper's maximal information on the key--to one eighth of that in BB84 for a fixed, reasonable amount of disturbance. We also show that the individual access to the particles poses a fundamental restriction to the eavesdropper, and discuss a novel attack type against the proposed protocol.

arXiv:0712.4247•Dec 27, 2007•1 citation

The Mechanics, Security, and Practical Vulnerabilities of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol

Anusha Tiwari

As quantum computing threatens classical cryptography like RSA via Shor's algorithm, Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)—especially BB84—offers physics-based security. BB84 leverages quantum principles: Heisenberg Uncertainty, No-Cloning Theorem, and superposition, shifting from math complexity to unbreakable physical laws using polarized photons for key exchange. The protocol detects eavesdropping through Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER), showing 25% errors in Intercept-Resend attacks. Key challenges like Photon Number Splitting (PNS) attacks are addressed via decoy states. Compared to B92 and E91, BB84 balances feasibility and security best. Despite issues like signal loss, BB84 provides provably secure communication, restoring trust in a post-quantum world.

European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Robustness of quantum cryptography: SARG04 key-distribution protocol

Dmitry Anatolevich Kronberg, S. N. Molotkov

The SARG04 protocol is aimed at the improvement of the robustness of the main protocols in quantum cryptography (primarily, BB84 and B92) against the PNS attack in the case of the application of weak coherent pulses instead of the one-particle signals. An optimal attack of eavesdropper on the transmitted key is explicitly constructed for arbitrary angles between the basis states. A critical error up to which the key distribution is possible and the length of the final key are determined.

Laser Physics•Apr 1, 2009•11 citations

Quantum Cryptography Protocols Robust against Photon Number Splitting Attacks for Weak Laser Pulse Implementations

Valerio Scarani, Antonio Acín, G. Ribordy +1 more

We introduce a new class of quantum key distribution protocols, tailored to be robust against photon number splitting (PNS) attacks. We study one of these protocols, which differs from the original protocol by Bennett and Brassard (BB84) only in the classical sifting procedure. This protocol is provably better than BB84 against PNS attacks at zero error.

arXiv:quant-ph/0211131•Physical Review Letters•Feb 6, 2004•812 citations
B92-type and BB84-type quantum cryptography schemes using superposed states of the vacuum and single particle states which are robust against PNS attacks are studied. The number of securely transferred classical bits per particle (not per qubit) sent in these schemes is calculated and found to have upper bounds. Possible experimental realizations using the cavity QED or linear optics are suggested.
Quantum key distribution schemes which employ encoding on vacuum-one-photon qubits are capable of transferring more information bits per particle than the standard schemes employing polarization or phase coding. We calculate the maximum number of classical bits per particle that can be securely transferred when the key distribution is performed with the BB84 and B92 protocols, respectively, using the vacuum-one-photon qubits. In particular, we show that for a generalized B92 protocol with the vacuum-one-photon qubits, a maximum of two bits per particle can be securely transferred. We also demonstrate the advantage brought about by performing a generalized measurement that is optimized for unambiguous discrimination of the encoded states: the parameter range where the transfer of two bits per particle can be achieved is dramatically enhanced as compared to the corresponding parameter range of projective measurements.
The first quantum cryptography protocol, proposed by Bennett and Brassard in 1984 (BB84), has been widely studied in recent years. This protocol uses four states (more precisely, two complementary bases) for the encoding of the classical bit. Recently, it has been noticed that by using the same four states, but a different encoding of information, one can define a protocol which is more robust in practical implementations, specifically when attenuated laser pulses are used instead of single-photon sources [V. Scarani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057901 (2004), referred to as the SARG04 protocol]. We present a detailed study of SARG04 in two different regimes. In the first part, we consider an implementation with a single-photon source: we derive bounds on the error rate QQQ for security against all possible attacks by the eavesdropper. The lower and the upper bound obtained for SARG04 ($Q\ensuremath{\lesssim}10.95%$ and $Q\ensuremath{\gtrsim}14.9%$, respectively) are close to those obtained for BB84 ($Q\ensuremath{\lesssim}12.4%$ and $Q\ensuremath{\gtrsim}14.6%$, respectively). In the second part, we consider a realistic source consisting of an attenuated laser and improve on previous analysis by allowing Alice to optimize the mean number of photons as a function of the distance. The SARG04 protocol is found to perform better than BB84, both in secret-key rate and in maximal achievable distance, for a wide class of Eve's attacks.
The quantum key distribution protocol BB84, published by C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard in 1984, describes how two spatially separated parties can generate a random bit string fully known only to them by transmission of single-qubit quantum states. Any attempt to eavesdrop on the protocol introduces disturbance which can be detected by the legitimate parties. In this Master's Thesis a novel modification to the BB84 protocol is analyzed. Instead of sending single particles one-by-one as in BB84, they are grouped and a non-local transformation is applied to each group before transmission. Each particle is sent to the intended receiver, always delaying the transmission until the receiver has acknowledged the previous particle on an authenticated classical channel, restricting eavesdropping to accessing the quantum transmission one particle at a time. Hence, an eavesdropper cannot undo the non-local transformation perfectly. Even if perfect cloning of quantum states was possible the state of the group could not be cloned. We calculate the maximal information on the established key provided by an intercept-resend attack and the induced disturbance for different transformations. We observe that it is possible to significantly reduce the eavesdropper's maximal information on the key--to one eighth of that in BB84 for a fixed, reasonable amount of disturbance. We also show that the individual access to the particles poses a fundamental restriction to the eavesdropper, and discuss a novel attack type against the proposed protocol.
As quantum computing threatens classical cryptography like RSA via Shor's algorithm, Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)—especially BB84—offers physics-based security. BB84 leverages quantum principles: Heisenberg Uncertainty, No-Cloning Theorem, and superposition, shifting from math complexity to unbreakable physical laws using polarized photons for key exchange. The protocol detects eavesdropping through Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER), showing 25% errors in Intercept-Resend attacks. Key challenges like Photon Number Splitting (PNS) attacks are addressed via decoy states. Compared to B92 and E91, BB84 balances feasibility and security best. Despite issues like signal loss, BB84 provides provably secure communication, restoring trust in a post-quantum world.