Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0505058 · Physical Review A

Adiabatic geometric phases in hydrogenlike atoms

Erik Sjöqvist, X. X. Yi, Johan Åberg

Published Nov 1, 2005• 16 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We examine the effect of spin-orbit coupling on geometric phases in hydrogenlike atoms exposed to a slowly varying magnetic field. The marginal geometric phases associated with the orbital angular momentum and the intrinsic spin fulfill a sum rule that explicitly relates them to the corresponding geometric phase of the whole system. The marginal geometric phases in the Zeeman and Paschen-Back limits are analyzed. We point out the existence of nodal points in the marginal phases that may be detected by topological means.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.72.054101

Related papers

Non-Abelian quantum holonomy of hydrogenlike atoms

Vahid Azimi Mousolou, C. M. Canali, Erik Sjöqvist

We study the Uhlmann holonomy [Rep. Math. Phys. 24, 229 (1986)] of quantum states for hydrogenlike atoms where the intrinsic spin and orbital angular momentum are coupled by the spin-orbit interaction and are subject to a slowly varying magnetic field. We show that the holonomy for the orbital angular momentum and spin subsystems is non-Abelian while the holonomy of the whole system is Abelian. Quantum entanglement in the states of the whole system is crucially related to the non-Abelian gauge structure of the subsystems. We analyze the phase of the Wilson loop variable associated with the Uhlmann holonomy and find a relation between the phase of the whole system and corresponding marginal phases. Based on the results for the model system, we provide evidence that the phase of the Wilson loop variable and the mixed-state geometric phase [E. Sj\"oqvist et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2845 (2000).] are generally inequivalent.

arXiv:1103.2435•Physical Review A•Sep 16, 2011•2 citations

Geometric Phase of Polarized Hydrogenlike Atoms in an External Magnetic Field

Zhong Feng Tang, David Finkelstein

We show that the motion of polarized hydrogenlike atoms in an external magnetic field $B$ is a cyclic evolution. The geometric phase they exhibit is dependent on both the initial state and the Hamiltonian. Properties of the geometric phase in the cases of weak (called Zeeman limit) and strong (called Paschen-Back limit) magnetic fields are presented. We point out that the results of the two limits are interpolated in the intermediate $B$ region. Some observable effects in a specially devised interferometer are predicted.

Physical Review Letters•Apr 17, 1995•10 citations

Topological and geometric phases

Helmut Rauch

Abstract Topological and geometrical effects appear in the solution of the Schrödinger equation due to special geometrical forms of the interaction, or due to interactions which do not result from conservative forces acting on the system (see Section 1.2). A conscientious reader may point out that all these effects could be entirely explained using the Schrödinger equation only. But the geometrical phase formalism is useful because it sometimes plays a role in fundamental quantum phenomena and it shows that additional phase factors exist which are easily overlooked, making the interpretation of measured effects more mysterious than necessary. Thus, our understand-ing of quantum mechanics has deepened since the existence of geometrical phases was explicitly revealed (Shapere and Wilczek 1989). This happened due to the seminal works of Pancharatnam (1956), Berry (1984), Anandan (1992), and Bhandari (1997). It also shows that a wavefunction often carries much more information than is usually extracted in a standard experiment. A typical example is the assumption of adiabaticity, where the magnetic moment of the neutron produces (inside a slowly varying magnetic field) a dynamical phase shift proportional to the path integral ∫ B ds, but when the direction of the field varies slowly an additional, i.e. geometrical, phase also appears. The back reaction of a quantum measurement can also be described as a kind of an induced topological phase (Aharonov et al. 1998).

•Aug 10, 2000•0 citations

Dynamic origin of non-Abelian Berry’s-phase effects in a simple atomic system

Martin Ligare

The full effect of adiabatically varying Hamiltonians on systems prepared in eigenstates of the stationary Hamiltonian often includes geometric Berry's phases. For degenerate systems these effects may result in transitions between distinct degenerate eigenstates that can be described in terms of a non-Abelian gauge potential. I demonstrate the explicit dynamic origin of such transitions between degenerate angular-momentum sublevels in an atom that is subject to collinear electric and magnetic fields that rotate adiabatically. The origin of the effects becomes clear when eigenstates of the total Hamiltonian, which includes the rotating fields, are calculated. The total Hamiltonian removes the degeneracy, and the eigenstates are in some cases linear combinations of the angular-momentum sublevels. Thus a system prepared in a specific sublevel may not remain in that sublevel, and the transition probability is exactly that given by an analysis of the geometric phase.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1990•2 citations

Berry Phase for Systems with Angular Momenta in Electric and Magnetic Fields

Kumar Ghosh, De Munshi, D., Binayak Dutta-Roy

The Berry phase for a variety of systems comprising of two angular momenta is discussed. These include the electron and proton in the ground state of the hydrogen atom (taking into account the hyperfine interaction), the positronium atom, the spin and orbital angular momenta of a single electron, muon capture by the deuteron in an external magnetic field, etc. Though the time scales involved, the underlying intrinsic Hamiltonians are quite different, as also the possible experimental probes, the geometric nature of the results for the Berry phase due to a time varying externally imposed magnetic field is found to be quite robust. Some indications are also put forward as to the possible interesting studies with time varying electric fields. The objective of this work is an attempt to broaden the scope of such studies in both the experimental and theoretical directions.

arXiv:1104.5299•Apr 28, 2011•0 citations

Extending the Geometric Phase to Relativistic Spacetime

Sajid Raihan Akash

The Berry phase [3] is traditionally understood as a geometric phase acquired during cyclic adiabatic evolution, often interpreted as the flux of an effective “magnetic field” through a solid angle in parameter space. In this thesis, we investigate situations in which a geometric phase arises even when no spatial solid angle is enclosed, revealing the limitations of the standard purely spatial interpretation. We first review the Berry phase for a spin-½ particle in a slowly varying magnetic field and analyze scenarios in which the system’s eigenstate is changed during the adiabatic evolution. We show that the resulting phase can be understood through a spacetime formulation analogous to the electrodynamic Aharonov–Bohm effect [1], where both “analogous magnetic” and “analogous electric” fields contribute through a spacetime surface integral. This framework clarifies how nonzero geometric phases can occur even when the projected spatial solid angle vanishes. We then extend this perspective to the Jahn–Teller 𝐸 ⊗ 𝑒 system. While a closed loop around the conical intersection yields the familiar π phase, we show that nontrivial geometric phases can also emerge in paths with zero net enclosed solid angle. Advisors: Herman Batelaan and Ilya Kravchenko

•Mar 25, 2026•0 citations
We examine the effect of spin-orbit coupling on geometric phases in hydrogenlike atoms exposed to a slowly varying magnetic field. The marginal geometric phases associated with the orbital angular momentum and the intrinsic spin fulfill a sum rule that explicitly relates them to the corresponding geometric phase of the whole system. The marginal geometric phases in the Zeeman and Paschen-Back limits are analyzed. We point out the existence of nodal points in the marginal phases that may be detected by topological means.
We study the Uhlmann holonomy [Rep. Math. Phys. 24, 229 (1986)] of quantum states for hydrogenlike atoms where the intrinsic spin and orbital angular momentum are coupled by the spin-orbit interaction and are subject to a slowly varying magnetic field. We show that the holonomy for the orbital angular momentum and spin subsystems is non-Abelian while the holonomy of the whole system is Abelian. Quantum entanglement in the states of the whole system is crucially related to the non-Abelian gauge structure of the subsystems. We analyze the phase of the Wilson loop variable associated with the Uhlmann holonomy and find a relation between the phase of the whole system and corresponding marginal phases. Based on the results for the model system, we provide evidence that the phase of the Wilson loop variable and the mixed-state geometric phase [E. Sj\"oqvist et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2845 (2000).] are generally inequivalent.
We show that the motion of polarized hydrogenlike atoms in an external magnetic field BBB is a cyclic evolution. The geometric phase they exhibit is dependent on both the initial state and the Hamiltonian. Properties of the geometric phase in the cases of weak (called Zeeman limit) and strong (called Paschen-Back limit) magnetic fields are presented. We point out that the results of the two limits are interpolated in the intermediate BBB region. Some observable effects in a specially devised interferometer are predicted.
Abstract Topological and geometrical effects appear in the solution of the Schrödinger equation due to special geometrical forms of the interaction, or due to interactions which do not result from conservative forces acting on the system (see Section 1.2). A conscientious reader may point out that all these effects could be entirely explained using the Schrödinger equation only. But the geometrical phase formalism is useful because it sometimes plays a role in fundamental quantum phenomena and it shows that additional phase factors exist which are easily overlooked, making the interpretation of measured effects more mysterious than necessary. Thus, our understand-ing of quantum mechanics has deepened since the existence of geometrical phases was explicitly revealed (Shapere and Wilczek 1989). This happened due to the seminal works of Pancharatnam (1956), Berry (1984), Anandan (1992), and Bhandari (1997). It also shows that a wavefunction often carries much more information than is usually extracted in a standard experiment. A typical example is the assumption of adiabaticity, where the magnetic moment of the neutron produces (inside a slowly varying magnetic field) a dynamical phase shift proportional to the path integral ∫ B ds, but when the direction of the field varies slowly an additional, i.e. geometrical, phase also appears. The back reaction of a quantum measurement can also be described as a kind of an induced topological phase (Aharonov et al. 1998).
The full effect of adiabatically varying Hamiltonians on systems prepared in eigenstates of the stationary Hamiltonian often includes geometric Berry's phases. For degenerate systems these effects may result in transitions between distinct degenerate eigenstates that can be described in terms of a non-Abelian gauge potential. I demonstrate the explicit dynamic origin of such transitions between degenerate angular-momentum sublevels in an atom that is subject to collinear electric and magnetic fields that rotate adiabatically. The origin of the effects becomes clear when eigenstates of the total Hamiltonian, which includes the rotating fields, are calculated. The total Hamiltonian removes the degeneracy, and the eigenstates are in some cases linear combinations of the angular-momentum sublevels. Thus a system prepared in a specific sublevel may not remain in that sublevel, and the transition probability is exactly that given by an analysis of the geometric phase.
The Berry phase for a variety of systems comprising of two angular momenta is discussed. These include the electron and proton in the ground state of the hydrogen atom (taking into account the hyperfine interaction), the positronium atom, the spin and orbital angular momenta of a single electron, muon capture by the deuteron in an external magnetic field, etc. Though the time scales involved, the underlying intrinsic Hamiltonians are quite different, as also the possible experimental probes, the geometric nature of the results for the Berry phase due to a time varying externally imposed magnetic field is found to be quite robust. Some indications are also put forward as to the possible interesting studies with time varying electric fields. The objective of this work is an attempt to broaden the scope of such studies in both the experimental and theoretical directions.
The Berry phase [3] is traditionally understood as a geometric phase acquired during cyclic adiabatic evolution, often interpreted as the flux of an effective “magnetic field” through a solid angle in parameter space. In this thesis, we investigate situations in which a geometric phase arises even when no spatial solid angle is enclosed, revealing the limitations of the standard purely spatial interpretation. We first review the Berry phase for a spin-½ particle in a slowly varying magnetic field and analyze scenarios in which the system’s eigenstate is changed during the adiabatic evolution. We show that the resulting phase can be understood through a spacetime formulation analogous to the electrodynamic Aharonov–Bohm effect [1], where both “analogous magnetic” and “analogous electric” fields contribute through a spacetime surface integral. This framework clarifies how nonzero geometric phases can occur even when the projected spatial solid angle vanishes. We then extend this perspective to the Jahn–Teller 𝐸 ⊗ 𝑒 system. While a closed loop around the conical intersection yields the familiar π phase, we show that nontrivial geometric phases can also emerge in paths with zero net enclosed solid angle. Advisors: Herman Batelaan and Ilya Kravchenko