Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0504192 · American Journal of Physics

An entangled web of crime: Bell’s theorem as a short story

Kurt Jacobs, Howard M. Wiseman

Published Sep 16, 2005• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Nonlocality of the type first elucidated by Bell in 1964 is a difficult concept to explain to nonspecialists and undergraduates. We attempt to do so by showing how nonlocality can be used to solve a problem in which someone might find themselves as the result of a series of normal, even if somewhat unlikely, events. Our story is told in the style of a Sherlock Holmes mystery, and is based on Mermin’s formulation of the “paradoxical” illustration of quantum nonlocality discovered by Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger.

DOI
10.1119/1.1979499

Related papers

An Entangled Web of Crime: Bell's Theorem as a Short Story

Jacobs, K, Howard M. Wiseman

Non-locality of the type first elucidated by Bell in 1964 is a difficult concept to explain to non-specialists and undergraduates. Here we attempt this by showing how such non-locality can be used to solve a problem in which someone might find themselves as the result of a collection of normal, even if somewhat unlikely, events. Our story is told in the style of a Sherlock Holmes mystery, and is based on Mermin's formulation of the "paradoxical" illustration of quantum non-locality discovered by Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger.

•Apr 26, 2005•8 citations

Comment on “An entangled web of crime: Bell’s theorem as a short story,” by K. Jacobs and H. M. Wiseman [Am. J. Phys. 73 (10), 932–937 (2005)]

P. K. Aravind

American Journal of Physics•Jul 13, 2007•0 citations

Locality and the Hardy theorem

Arthur I. Fine

But this conclusion [nonlocality] needs careful discussion in order to clarify what is going on . (Redhead 1987, p. 3) Within the foundations of physics in recent years, Bell's theorem has played the role of what Thomas Kuhn calls a ‘paradigm’: that is, an exemplary piece of work that others learn from, imitate and develop. Following a period of articulation and consolidation, the first generation of developments of the Bell theorem was initiated by Heywood and Redhead (1983). They produced a nonlocality result in the algebraic style of the Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem (Bell 1966; Kochen and Specker 1967), moving away from the probabilistic relations characteristic of the Bell theorems proper. More recently a second generation develops results by Peres (1990), Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (1990), and Hardy (1993). In addition to moving away from probabilities, this generation tries to dispense with the limiting inequalities of the Bell theorem to yield socalled ‘Bell theorems without inequalities’. With respect to probabilities, however, Hardy is a half-way house. It requires no inequalities but the result contradicts quantum mechanics under certain locality assumptions only if the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics hold in at least one case. I want to examine the Hardy theorem and its interpretation. Initially, I intend to ignore respects in which it dispenses with probabilities because I want to point out the interesting significance of the theorem in a probabilistic context. We will see that when probabilities are restored, so are inequalities. Then we will see what the theorem has to contribute on the topic of locality.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 28, 1999•3 citations

Quantum mysteries revisited

N. David Mermin

A gedanken gadget is described, based on an idea of Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger, that provides a more powerful demonstration of quantum nonlocality than Bell’s analysis of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1990•575 citations

Bell's theorem and beyond

Mark S. Hillery, Bernard Yurke

The authors survey what is known about correlations in physical systems. Bell (1964-6) found that locally realistic theories are limited in the types of correlations which they allow. The more recent results of Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger (1992) and of Hardy (1989) have shown that local realism imposes even stronger restrictions than those found by Bell. It is less well known that quantum mechanics is also limited in the kinds of correlations it can produce. This was first discovered by Tsirelson (1980). The authors discuss Tsirelson's results and related work by Landau (1987). They conclude by presenting further conditions which quantum mechanical correlations must satisfy.

Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Jun 1, 1995•19 citations

Variation on a theme by GHZM

P. K. Aravind

In the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-Mermin (GHZM) proof of Bell's theorem, a source periodically emits an entangled state of three particles whose properties are analyzed by three distant observers and used to prove Bell's nonlocality theorem. This paper analyzes a somewhat different gedanken experiment involving only two observers that nevertheless makes indirect use of the GHZ states to prove Bell's theorem. The relationship of the GHZM proof to the present one is discussed, and it is pointed out that the latter provides an interesting new view of the connection between the "two theorems of John Bell".

arXiv:quant-ph/0701031•Jan 7, 2007•0 citations
Nonlocality of the type first elucidated by Bell in 1964 is a difficult concept to explain to nonspecialists and undergraduates. We attempt to do so by showing how nonlocality can be used to solve a problem in which someone might find themselves as the result of a series of normal, even if somewhat unlikely, events. Our story is told in the style of a Sherlock Holmes mystery, and is based on Mermin’s formulation of the “paradoxical” illustration of quantum nonlocality discovered by Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger.
Non-locality of the type first elucidated by Bell in 1964 is a difficult concept to explain to non-specialists and undergraduates. Here we attempt this by showing how such non-locality can be used to solve a problem in which someone might find themselves as the result of a collection of normal, even if somewhat unlikely, events. Our story is told in the style of a Sherlock Holmes mystery, and is based on Mermin's formulation of the "paradoxical" illustration of quantum non-locality discovered by Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger.
But this conclusion [nonlocality] needs careful discussion in order to clarify what is going on . (Redhead 1987, p. 3) Within the foundations of physics in recent years, Bell's theorem has played the role of what Thomas Kuhn calls a ‘paradigm’: that is, an exemplary piece of work that others learn from, imitate and develop. Following a period of articulation and consolidation, the first generation of developments of the Bell theorem was initiated by Heywood and Redhead (1983). They produced a nonlocality result in the algebraic style of the Bell–Kochen–Specker theorem (Bell 1966; Kochen and Specker 1967), moving away from the probabilistic relations characteristic of the Bell theorems proper. More recently a second generation develops results by Peres (1990), Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (1990), and Hardy (1993). In addition to moving away from probabilities, this generation tries to dispense with the limiting inequalities of the Bell theorem to yield socalled ‘Bell theorems without inequalities’. With respect to probabilities, however, Hardy is a half-way house. It requires no inequalities but the result contradicts quantum mechanics under certain locality assumptions only if the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics hold in at least one case. I want to examine the Hardy theorem and its interpretation. Initially, I intend to ignore respects in which it dispenses with probabilities because I want to point out the interesting significance of the theorem in a probabilistic context. We will see that when probabilities are restored, so are inequalities. Then we will see what the theorem has to contribute on the topic of locality.
The authors survey what is known about correlations in physical systems. Bell (1964-6) found that locally realistic theories are limited in the types of correlations which they allow. The more recent results of Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger (1992) and of Hardy (1989) have shown that local realism imposes even stronger restrictions than those found by Bell. It is less well known that quantum mechanics is also limited in the kinds of correlations it can produce. This was first discovered by Tsirelson (1980). The authors discuss Tsirelson's results and related work by Landau (1987). They conclude by presenting further conditions which quantum mechanical correlations must satisfy.
In the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-Mermin (GHZM) proof of Bell's theorem, a source periodically emits an entangled state of three particles whose properties are analyzed by three distant observers and used to prove Bell's nonlocality theorem. This paper analyzes a somewhat different gedanken experiment involving only two observers that nevertheless makes indirect use of the GHZ states to prove Bell's theorem. The relationship of the GHZM proof to the present one is discussed, and it is pointed out that the latter provides an interesting new view of the connection between the "two theorems of John Bell".