Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0502055

Classical Capacity of Quantum Binary Adder Channels

G.V. Klimovitch, Andreas Winter

Published Feb 9, 2005• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We analyze the quantum binary adder channel, i.e. the quantum generalization of the classical, and well-studied, binary adder channel: in this model qubits rather than classical bits are transmitted. This of course is as special case of the general theory of quantum multiple access channels, and we may apply the established formulas for the capacity region to it. However, the binary adder channel is of particular interest classically, which motivates our generalizing it to the quantum domain. It turns out to be a very nice case study not only of multi-user quantum information theory, but also on the role entanglement plays there. It turns out that the analogous classical situation, the multi-user channel supported by shared randomness, is not distinct from the channel without shared randomness, as far as rates are concerned. However, we discuss the effect the new resource has on error probabilities, in an appendix. We focus specially on the effect entanglement between the senders as well as between senders and receiver has on the capacity region. Interestingly, in some of these cases one can devise rather simple codes meeting the capacity bounds, even in a zero-error model, which is in marked difference to code construction in the classical case.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0502055

Related papers

On the classical capacity of a quantum multiple-access channel

G.V. Klimovitch

We analyze the quantum adder channel, i.e. the extension of a classical multiple-access additive binary channel to the quantum regime, in which quantum bits (qubits) rather than classical bits are transmitted. Quantum entanglement between different transmitters and/or the receiver results in a significant expansion of the capacity region of the channel, in comparison with its classical counterpart, a property which can be used, e.g., to considerably improve bandwidth efficiency of fiber communication networks in the future.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Nov 13, 2002•7 citations

Capacity theorems for quantum multiple-access channels: classical-quantum and quantum-quantum capacity regions

Jon Yard, Patrick M. Hayden, Igor Devetak

We consider quantum channels with two senders and one receiver. For an arbitrary such channel, we give multiletter characterizations of two different two-dimensional capacity regions. The first region comprises the rates at which it is possible for one sender to send classical information, while the other sends quantum information. The second region consists of the rates at which each sender can send quantum information. For each region, we give an example of a channel for which the corresponding region has a single-letter description. One of our examples relies on a new result proved here, perhaps of independent interest, stating that the coherent information over any degradable channel is concave in the input density operator. We conclude with connections to other work and a discussion on generalizations where each user simultaneously sends classical and quantum information.

arXiv:quant-ph/0501045•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jun 16, 2008•120 citations

Capacity theorems for quantum multiple access channels

Jon Yard, I. Devetak, Patrick M. Hayden

We consider quantum channels with two senders and one receiver. For an arbitrary such channel, we give multi-letter characterizations of two different two-dimensional capacity regions. The first region characterizes the rates at which it is possible for one sender to send classical information while the other sends quantum information. The second region gives the rates at which each sender can send quantum information. We give an example of a channel for which each region has a single-letter description, concluding with a characterization of the rates at which each user can simultaneously send classical and quantum information

arXiv:cs/0508031•IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jan 1, 2005•17 citations

Super-Activation of Zero-Error Capacity of Noisy Quantum Channels

Runyao Duan

We study various super-activation effects in the following zero-error communication scenario: One sender wants to send classical or quantum information through a noisy quantum channel to one receiver with zero probability of error. First we show that there are quantum channels of which a single use is not able to transmit classical information perfectly yet two uses can. This is achieved by employing entangled input states between different uses of the given channel and thus cannot happen for classical channels. Second we exhibit a class of quantum channel with vanishing zero-error classical capacity such that when a noiseless qubit channel or one ebit shared entanglement are available, it can be used to transmit $\log_2 d$ noiseless qubits, where 2d is the dimension of input state space. Third we further construct quantum channels with vanishing zero-error classical capacity when assisted with classical feedback can be used to transmit both classical and quantum information perfectly. These striking findings not only indicate both the zero-error quantum and classical capacities of quantum channels satisfy a strong super-additivity beyond any classical channels, but also highlight the activation power of auxiliary physical resources in zero-error communication.

arXiv:0906.2527•Jun 15, 2009•54 citations

Introduction

Mark M. Wilde

Before quantum information became an established discipline, John R. Pierce issued the following quip at the end of his 1973 retrospective article on the history of information theory (Pierce, 1973): “I think that I have never met a physicist who understood information theory. I wish that physicists would stop talking about reformulating information theory and would give us a general expression for the capacity of a channel with quantum effects taken into account rather than a number of special cases.” Since the publication of Pierce's article, we have learned much more about quantum mechanics and information theory than he might have imagined at the time, but we have also realized that there is much more to discover. In spite of all that we have learned, we still unfortunately have not been able to address Pierce's concern in the above quote in full generality. The most basic question that we could ask in quantum Shannon theory (and the one with which Pierce was concerned) is how much classical information a sender can transmit to a receiver by exploiting a quantum channel. We have determined many special cases of quantum channels for which we do know their classical capacities, but we also now know that this most basic question is still wide open in the general case. What Pierce might not have imagined at the time is that a quantum channel has a much larger variety of capacities than does a classical channel. For example, we might wish to determine the classical capacity of a quantum channel assisted by entanglement shared between the sender and receiver. We have seen that in the simplest of cases, such as the noiseless qubit channel, shared entanglement boosts the classical capacity up to two bits, and we now refer to this phenomenon as the super-dense coding effect (see Chapter 6). Interestingly, the entanglementassisted capacity of a quantum channel is one of the few scenarios where we can claim to have a complete understanding of the channel's transmission capabilities. From the results regarding the entanglement-assisted capacity, we have learned that shared entanglement is often a “friend” because it tends to simplify results in both quantum Shannon theory and other subfields of quantum information science.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 2, 2016•0 citations

Quantum channel capacities: Multiparty communication

Maciej Demianowicz, Paweł Horodecki

We analyze different aspects of multiparty communication over quantum memoryless channels and generalize some of the key results known from bipartite channels to the multiparty scenario. In particular, we introduce multiparty versions of subspace and entanglement transmission fidelities. We also provide alternative, local, versions of fidelities and show their equivalence to the global ones in context of capacity regions defined. An equivalence of two different capacity notions with respect to two types of fidelities is proven. In analogy to the bipartite case it is shown, via sufficiency of isometric encoding theorem, that additional classical forward side channel does not increase capacity region of any quantum channel with $k$ senders and $m$ receivers which represents a compact unit of general quantum networks theory. The result proves that recently provided capacity region of a multiple access channel [M. Horodecki et al., Nature 436, 673 (2005); J. Yard et al., e-print quant-ph/0501045], is optimal also in a scenario of an additional support of forward classical communication.

arXiv:quant-ph/0603106•Physical Review A•Oct 27, 2006•11 citations
We analyze the quantum binary adder channel, i.e. the quantum generalization of the classical, and well-studied, binary adder channel: in this model qubits rather than classical bits are transmitted. This of course is as special case of the general theory of quantum multiple access channels, and we may apply the established formulas for the capacity region to it. However, the binary adder channel is of particular interest classically, which motivates our generalizing it to the quantum domain. It turns out to be a very nice case study not only of multi-user quantum information theory, but also on the role entanglement plays there. It turns out that the analogous classical situation, the multi-user channel supported by shared randomness, is not distinct from the channel without shared randomness, as far as rates are concerned. However, we discuss the effect the new resource has on error probabilities, in an appendix. We focus specially on the effect entanglement between the senders as well as between senders and receiver has on the capacity region. Interestingly, in some of these cases one can devise rather simple codes meeting the capacity bounds, even in a zero-error model, which is in marked difference to code construction in the classical case.
We analyze the quantum adder channel, i.e. the extension of a classical multiple-access additive binary channel to the quantum regime, in which quantum bits (qubits) rather than classical bits are transmitted. Quantum entanglement between different transmitters and/or the receiver results in a significant expansion of the capacity region of the channel, in comparison with its classical counterpart, a property which can be used, e.g., to considerably improve bandwidth efficiency of fiber communication networks in the future.
We consider quantum channels with two senders and one receiver. For an arbitrary such channel, we give multiletter characterizations of two different two-dimensional capacity regions. The first region comprises the rates at which it is possible for one sender to send classical information, while the other sends quantum information. The second region consists of the rates at which each sender can send quantum information. For each region, we give an example of a channel for which the corresponding region has a single-letter description. One of our examples relies on a new result proved here, perhaps of independent interest, stating that the coherent information over any degradable channel is concave in the input density operator. We conclude with connections to other work and a discussion on generalizations where each user simultaneously sends classical and quantum information.
We consider quantum channels with two senders and one receiver. For an arbitrary such channel, we give multi-letter characterizations of two different two-dimensional capacity regions. The first region characterizes the rates at which it is possible for one sender to send classical information while the other sends quantum information. The second region gives the rates at which each sender can send quantum information. We give an example of a channel for which each region has a single-letter description, concluding with a characterization of the rates at which each user can simultaneously send classical and quantum information
We study various super-activation effects in the following zero-error communication scenario: One sender wants to send classical or quantum information through a noisy quantum channel to one receiver with zero probability of error. First we show that there are quantum channels of which a single use is not able to transmit classical information perfectly yet two uses can. This is achieved by employing entangled input states between different uses of the given channel and thus cannot happen for classical channels. Second we exhibit a class of quantum channel with vanishing zero-error classical capacity such that when a noiseless qubit channel or one ebit shared entanglement are available, it can be used to transmit log⁡2d\log_2 dlog2​d noiseless qubits, where 2d is the dimension of input state space. Third we further construct quantum channels with vanishing zero-error classical capacity when assisted with classical feedback can be used to transmit both classical and quantum information perfectly. These striking findings not only indicate both the zero-error quantum and classical capacities of quantum channels satisfy a strong super-additivity beyond any classical channels, but also highlight the activation power of auxiliary physical resources in zero-error communication.
Before quantum information became an established discipline, John R. Pierce issued the following quip at the end of his 1973 retrospective article on the history of information theory (Pierce, 1973): “I think that I have never met a physicist who understood information theory. I wish that physicists would stop talking about reformulating information theory and would give us a general expression for the capacity of a channel with quantum effects taken into account rather than a number of special cases.” Since the publication of Pierce's article, we have learned much more about quantum mechanics and information theory than he might have imagined at the time, but we have also realized that there is much more to discover. In spite of all that we have learned, we still unfortunately have not been able to address Pierce's concern in the above quote in full generality. The most basic question that we could ask in quantum Shannon theory (and the one with which Pierce was concerned) is how much classical information a sender can transmit to a receiver by exploiting a quantum channel. We have determined many special cases of quantum channels for which we do know their classical capacities, but we also now know that this most basic question is still wide open in the general case. What Pierce might not have imagined at the time is that a quantum channel has a much larger variety of capacities than does a classical channel. For example, we might wish to determine the classical capacity of a quantum channel assisted by entanglement shared between the sender and receiver. We have seen that in the simplest of cases, such as the noiseless qubit channel, shared entanglement boosts the classical capacity up to two bits, and we now refer to this phenomenon as the super-dense coding effect (see Chapter 6). Interestingly, the entanglementassisted capacity of a quantum channel is one of the few scenarios where we can claim to have a complete understanding of the channel's transmission capabilities. From the results regarding the entanglement-assisted capacity, we have learned that shared entanglement is often a “friend” because it tends to simplify results in both quantum Shannon theory and other subfields of quantum information science.
We analyze different aspects of multiparty communication over quantum memoryless channels and generalize some of the key results known from bipartite channels to the multiparty scenario. In particular, we introduce multiparty versions of subspace and entanglement transmission fidelities. We also provide alternative, local, versions of fidelities and show their equivalence to the global ones in context of capacity regions defined. An equivalence of two different capacity notions with respect to two types of fidelities is proven. In analogy to the bipartite case it is shown, via sufficiency of isometric encoding theorem, that additional classical forward side channel does not increase capacity region of any quantum channel with kkk senders and mmm receivers which represents a compact unit of general quantum networks theory. The result proves that recently provided capacity region of a multiple access channel [M. Horodecki et al., Nature 436, 673 (2005); J. Yard et al., e-print quant-ph/0501045], is optimal also in a scenario of an additional support of forward classical communication.