Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0501010 · Progress of Theoretical Physics

Quantum Eraser Using a Modified Stern-Gerlach Setup

Tabish Qureshi, Zini Rahman

Published Jan 1, 2012• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose a new setup to demonstrate quantum eraser, using spin-1/2 particles in a modified Stern-Gerlach setup, with a double slit. The which-way information can be erased simply by applying a transverse magnetic field with an additional magnet, resulting in the emergence of two complementary staggered interference patterns. Use of the classic Stern-Gerlach setup, and the unweaving of the washed out interference without any coincident counting, is what makes this proposal novel.

DOI
10.1143/ptp.127.71

Related papers

Quantum coherence recovery through Stern–Gerlach erasure

Richard Barney, Jean-François S. Van Huele

Abstract Quantum erasure probes the dynamic nature of quantum coherence. It allows quantum systems to exhibit interference effects by recovering coherence that was previously lost through entanglement with another system. In this paper we examine the concept of a quantum eraser which creates and then erases path information through repeated use of the Stern–Gerlach effect. We explore the degree to which this eraser can recover quantum coherence. We find that the recovered coherence depends on the spin of the objects passing through the eraser and on the relative angle between the orientations of the eraser’s two magnets. We determine that full coherence can always be recovered for spin-1/2 objects independent of the value of the spin projection but cannot always be recovered for objects with larger spin values. We then discuss how the quantum coherence could be experimentally measured in this setup. Finally, we comment on the limitations of this Stern–Gerlach eraser and similar erasure schemes.

Physica Scripta•Jun 27, 2019•4 citations

Quantum erasure within the optical Stern-Gerlach model

M. Chianello, Michele Tumminello, Alessandro Vaglica +1 more

In the optical Stern-Gerlach effect the two branches in which the incoming atomic packet splits up can display interference pattern outside the cavity when a field measurement is made which erases the which-way information on the quantum paths the system can follow. On the contrary, the mere possibility to acquire this information causes a decoherence effect which cancels out the interference pattern. A phase-space analysis is also carried out to investigate on the negativity of the Wigner function and on the connection between its covariance matrix and the distinguishability of the quantum paths.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502065•Physical Review A•May 7, 2004•9 citations

A modified Stern-Gerlach experiment using a quantum two-state magnetic field

Ramin G. Daghigh, Michael D. Green, Christopher J. West

The Stern-Gerlach experiment has played an important role in our understanding of quantum behavior. We propose and analyze a modified version of this experiment where the magnetic field of the detector is in a quantum superposition, which may be experimentally realized using a superconducting flux qubit. We show that if incident spin-1/2 particles couple with the two-state magnetic field, a discrete target distribution results that resembles the distribution in the classical Stern-Gerlach experiment. As an application of the general result, we compute the distribution for a Gaussian waveform of the incident fermion. This analysis allows us to demonstrate theoretically: (1) the quantization of the intrinsic angular momentum of a spin-1/2 particle, and (2) a correlation between EPR pairs leading to nonlocality, without necessarily collapsing the particle’s spin wavefunction.

arXiv:1608.01638•Results in Physics•Mar 21, 2018•3 citations

A Note on the ‘Quantum Eraser’

William Seager

This note aims to make more familiar to philosophers yet another bizarre quantum mechanical effect with disturbing metaphysical implications. It is possible to modify the classic double-slit experiment so that one can register the path of a particle to determine which slit it passes through, and then erase this registered information so that the interference effects which would normally disappear upon registration of the “which path” information are reconstituted. Thus the “trajectory” of particles can be effected by temporally and spatially distant operations on the slit detectors. Nonetheless, no untoward effects (such as superluminal signalling) can result from the operation of the eraser.

Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 1996•2 citations

A quantum eraser experiment

Yoon-Ho Kim, S. P. Kulik, Marlan O. Scully +1 more

Summary form only given. We say that the quantum observables "position" and "momentum" are "complementary" because the precise knowledge of the position (momentum) implies that all possible outcomes of measuring the momentum (position) are equally probable. In two-slit experiments, the common understanding is that the position-momentum uncertainty relation makes it impossible to determine which slit the photon (or electron) passes through without at the same time disturbing the object enough to destroy the interference pattern. In 1982, Scully et al. suggested a way around this position-momentum uncertainty obstacle and proposed a quantum eraser to obtain which-path or particle-like information without scattering or otherwise introducing large uncontrolled phase factors to disturb the interference. Since 1982, quantum has been claimed in several experiments; however, the original proposed ideas have not been fully demonstrated. We demonstrate them here.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Jan 20, 2003•0 citations

Incorporating the Stern-Gerlach delayed-choice quantum eraser into the undergraduate quantum mechanics curriculum

William Courtney, Lucas B. Vieira, Paul S. Julienne +1 more

As “Stern-Gerlach first” becomes increasingly popular in the undergraduate quantum mechanics curriculum, we show how one can extend the treatment found in conventional textbooks to cover some exciting new quantum phenomena. Namely, we illustrate how one can describe a delayed choice variant of the quantum eraser which is realized within the Stern-Gerlach framework. Covering this material allows the instructor to reinforce notions of changes in basis functions, quantum superpositions, quantum measurements, and the complementarity principle as expressed in whether we know “which-way” information or not. It also allows the instructor to dispel common misconceptions of when a measurement occurs and when a system is in a superposition of states.

arXiv:1712.02670•American Journal of Physics•Mar 19, 2020•8 citations
We propose a new setup to demonstrate quantum eraser, using spin-1/2 particles in a modified Stern-Gerlach setup, with a double slit. The which-way information can be erased simply by applying a transverse magnetic field with an additional magnet, resulting in the emergence of two complementary staggered interference patterns. Use of the classic Stern-Gerlach setup, and the unweaving of the washed out interference without any coincident counting, is what makes this proposal novel.
Abstract Quantum erasure probes the dynamic nature of quantum coherence. It allows quantum systems to exhibit interference effects by recovering coherence that was previously lost through entanglement with another system. In this paper we examine the concept of a quantum eraser which creates and then erases path information through repeated use of the Stern–Gerlach effect. We explore the degree to which this eraser can recover quantum coherence. We find that the recovered coherence depends on the spin of the objects passing through the eraser and on the relative angle between the orientations of the eraser’s two magnets. We determine that full coherence can always be recovered for spin-1/2 objects independent of the value of the spin projection but cannot always be recovered for objects with larger spin values. We then discuss how the quantum coherence could be experimentally measured in this setup. Finally, we comment on the limitations of this Stern–Gerlach eraser and similar erasure schemes.
In the optical Stern-Gerlach effect the two branches in which the incoming atomic packet splits up can display interference pattern outside the cavity when a field measurement is made which erases the which-way information on the quantum paths the system can follow. On the contrary, the mere possibility to acquire this information causes a decoherence effect which cancels out the interference pattern. A phase-space analysis is also carried out to investigate on the negativity of the Wigner function and on the connection between its covariance matrix and the distinguishability of the quantum paths.
The Stern-Gerlach experiment has played an important role in our understanding of quantum behavior. We propose and analyze a modified version of this experiment where the magnetic field of the detector is in a quantum superposition, which may be experimentally realized using a superconducting flux qubit. We show that if incident spin-1/2 particles couple with the two-state magnetic field, a discrete target distribution results that resembles the distribution in the classical Stern-Gerlach experiment. As an application of the general result, we compute the distribution for a Gaussian waveform of the incident fermion. This analysis allows us to demonstrate theoretically: (1) the quantization of the intrinsic angular momentum of a spin-1/2 particle, and (2) a correlation between EPR pairs leading to nonlocality, without necessarily collapsing the particle’s spin wavefunction.
This note aims to make more familiar to philosophers yet another bizarre quantum mechanical effect with disturbing metaphysical implications. It is possible to modify the classic double-slit experiment so that one can register the path of a particle to determine which slit it passes through, and then erase this registered information so that the interference effects which would normally disappear upon registration of the “which path” information are reconstituted. Thus the “trajectory” of particles can be effected by temporally and spatially distant operations on the slit detectors. Nonetheless, no untoward effects (such as superluminal signalling) can result from the operation of the eraser.
Summary form only given. We say that the quantum observables "position" and "momentum" are "complementary" because the precise knowledge of the position (momentum) implies that all possible outcomes of measuring the momentum (position) are equally probable. In two-slit experiments, the common understanding is that the position-momentum uncertainty relation makes it impossible to determine which slit the photon (or electron) passes through without at the same time disturbing the object enough to destroy the interference pattern. In 1982, Scully et al. suggested a way around this position-momentum uncertainty obstacle and proposed a quantum eraser to obtain which-path or particle-like information without scattering or otherwise introducing large uncontrolled phase factors to disturb the interference. Since 1982, quantum has been claimed in several experiments; however, the original proposed ideas have not been fully demonstrated. We demonstrate them here.
As “Stern-Gerlach first” becomes increasingly popular in the undergraduate quantum mechanics curriculum, we show how one can extend the treatment found in conventional textbooks to cover some exciting new quantum phenomena. Namely, we illustrate how one can describe a delayed choice variant of the quantum eraser which is realized within the Stern-Gerlach framework. Covering this material allows the instructor to reinforce notions of changes in basis functions, quantum superpositions, quantum measurements, and the complementarity principle as expressed in whether we know “which-way” information or not. It also allows the instructor to dispel common misconceptions of when a measurement occurs and when a system is in a superposition of states.