Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0411144 · Physical Review A

Quantum-gate characterization in an extended Hilbert space

Peter P. Rohde, Geoff J. Pryde, Jeremy L. O’Brien, Timothy C. Ralph

Published Sep 6, 2005• 33 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We describe an approach for characterizing the process performed by a quantum gate using quantum process tomography, by first modeling the gate in an extended Hilbert space, which includes nonqubit degrees of freedom. To prevent unphysical processes from being predicted, present quantum process tomography procedures incorporate mathematical constraints, which make no assumptions as to the actual physical nature of the system being described. By contrast, the procedure presented here assumes a particular class of physical processes, and enforces physicality by fitting the data to this model. This allows quantum process tomography to be performed using a smaller experimental data set, and produces parameters with a direct physical interpretation. The approach is demonstrated by example of mode matching in an all-optical controlled-NOT gate. The techniques described are general and could be applied to other optical circuits or quantum computing architectures.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.72.032306

Related papers

Quantum gate characterization in an extended Hilbert space

Peter P. Rohde, Geoff J. Pryde, Jeremy L. O’Brien +1 more

We describe an approach for characterizing optical quantum gates, by constructing models which incorporate mode-matching effects. Quantum process tomography is then performed on the model. The techniques can be generalized to other quantum computing architectures.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Dec 10, 2005•4 citations

Physical Gate-Set Tomography

Brandon Ruzic, Kevin C Young, Stefan Seritan

Physical models of quantum gates can directly incorporate experimental degrees of freedom, such as laser power or microwave phase, but the forward simulation required to use these models can result in impractical overhead in computational time.In this poster, we develop a method for efficient, accurate interpolation of quantum process matrices over physical parameter space, and we apply our method to study the sensitivity of quantum applications at both the gate level and circuit level.We then implement an extension of gate-set tomography (GST) that provides a comprehensive view into the errors suffered by a quantum information processor.In its standard form, GST fits a general Markovian model to experimental data in terms of process matrices that are often difficult to interpret.Our extension to this method uses process matrices interpolated over physical parameters in the optimization loop of GST to directly estimate physical model parameters, providing a clear description of the errors in a quantum processor, while reducing the required number of GST sequences by orders of magnitude compared to its standard form.

•Mar 1, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate

Jeremy L. O’Brien, Geoff J. Pryde, Alexei Gilchrist +4 more

We demonstrate complete characterization of a two-qubit entangling process--a linear optics controlled-NOT gate operating with coincident detection--by quantum process tomography. We use a maximum-likelihood estimation to convert the experimental data into a physical process matrix. The process matrix allows an accurate prediction of the operation of the gate for arbitrary input states and a calculation of gate performance measures such as the average gate fidelity, average purity, and entangling capability of our gate, which are 0.90, 0.83, and 0.73, respectively.

arXiv:quant-ph/0402166•Physical Review Letters•Aug 20, 2004•499 citations

Introduction to Quantum Gate Set Tomography

Greenbaum, Daniel

Quantum gate set tomography (GST) has emerged as a promising method for the full characterization of quantum logic gates. In contrast to quantum process tomography (QPT), GST self-consistently and correctly accounts for state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. It therefore provides significantly more accurate estimates than QPT as gate fidelities increase into the fault-tolerant regime. We give a detailed review of GST and provide a self-contained guide to its implementation. The method is presented in a step-by-step fashion and relevant mathematical background material is included. Our goal is to demonstrate the utility of GST as both an accurate characterization technique and a simple and effective diagnostic tool. As an illustration, we compare the output of GST and QPT using simulated example data for a single qubit. In agreement with the original literature, we find that coherent errors are poorly estimated by QPT near quantum error correction thresholds, while GST is accurate in this regime.

arXiv:1509.02921•Sep 9, 2015•81 citations

Extended quantum process tomography of logical operations on an encoded bosonic qubit

Mikael Kervinen, Shahnawaz Ahmed, Marina Kudra +5 more

We demonstrate the use of coherent-state quantum process tomography (csQPT) for a bosonic-mode superconducting circuit. We have enhanced our methodology over previous implementations of csQPT by leveraging Kraus operators and constrained gradient descent to learn the underlying process. We show the results of our method by characterizing a logical quantum gate implemented using displacement and selective number-dependent arbitrary phase operations on an encoded qubit. Our use of csQPT allows for the reconstruction of Kraus operators for the larger Hilbert space rather than being limited to the logical subspace. This approach enables us to more accurately identify and quantify the various error mechanisms that can lead to gate infidelity, including those occurring outside of the computational subspace. We showcase the potential of our approach by demonstrating the ability to quantify leakage outside of the computational subspace, a key factor for developing more robust and reliable quantum gates in high-dimensional systems. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2303.01451•Physical Review A•Aug 14, 2024•4 citations

Realization of quantum process tomography in NMR

Andrew M. Childs, Isaac L. Chuang, Debbie Leung

Quantum process tomography is a procedure by which the unknown dynamical evolution of an open quantum system can be fully experimentally characterized. We demonstrate explicitly how this procedure can be implemented with a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer. This allows us to measure the fidelity of a controlled-NOT logic gate and to experimentally investigate the error model for our computer. Based on the latter analysis, we test an important assumption underlying many models of quantum error correction, the independence of errors on different qubits.

arXiv:quant-ph/0012032•Physical Review A•Jun 13, 2001•205 citations
We describe an approach for characterizing the process performed by a quantum gate using quantum process tomography, by first modeling the gate in an extended Hilbert space, which includes nonqubit degrees of freedom. To prevent unphysical processes from being predicted, present quantum process tomography procedures incorporate mathematical constraints, which make no assumptions as to the actual physical nature of the system being described. By contrast, the procedure presented here assumes a particular class of physical processes, and enforces physicality by fitting the data to this model. This allows quantum process tomography to be performed using a smaller experimental data set, and produces parameters with a direct physical interpretation. The approach is demonstrated by example of mode matching in an all-optical controlled-NOT gate. The techniques described are general and could be applied to other optical circuits or quantum computing architectures.
Physical models of quantum gates can directly incorporate experimental degrees of freedom, such as laser power or microwave phase, but the forward simulation required to use these models can result in impractical overhead in computational time.In this poster, we develop a method for efficient, accurate interpolation of quantum process matrices over physical parameter space, and we apply our method to study the sensitivity of quantum applications at both the gate level and circuit level.We then implement an extension of gate-set tomography (GST) that provides a comprehensive view into the errors suffered by a quantum information processor.In its standard form, GST fits a general Markovian model to experimental data in terms of process matrices that are often difficult to interpret.Our extension to this method uses process matrices interpolated over physical parameters in the optimization loop of GST to directly estimate physical model parameters, providing a clear description of the errors in a quantum processor, while reducing the required number of GST sequences by orders of magnitude compared to its standard form.
We demonstrate complete characterization of a two-qubit entangling process--a linear optics controlled-NOT gate operating with coincident detection--by quantum process tomography. We use a maximum-likelihood estimation to convert the experimental data into a physical process matrix. The process matrix allows an accurate prediction of the operation of the gate for arbitrary input states and a calculation of gate performance measures such as the average gate fidelity, average purity, and entangling capability of our gate, which are 0.90, 0.83, and 0.73, respectively.
Quantum gate set tomography (GST) has emerged as a promising method for the full characterization of quantum logic gates. In contrast to quantum process tomography (QPT), GST self-consistently and correctly accounts for state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. It therefore provides significantly more accurate estimates than QPT as gate fidelities increase into the fault-tolerant regime. We give a detailed review of GST and provide a self-contained guide to its implementation. The method is presented in a step-by-step fashion and relevant mathematical background material is included. Our goal is to demonstrate the utility of GST as both an accurate characterization technique and a simple and effective diagnostic tool. As an illustration, we compare the output of GST and QPT using simulated example data for a single qubit. In agreement with the original literature, we find that coherent errors are poorly estimated by QPT near quantum error correction thresholds, while GST is accurate in this regime.
We demonstrate the use of coherent-state quantum process tomography (csQPT) for a bosonic-mode superconducting circuit. We have enhanced our methodology over previous implementations of csQPT by leveraging Kraus operators and constrained gradient descent to learn the underlying process. We show the results of our method by characterizing a logical quantum gate implemented using displacement and selective number-dependent arbitrary phase operations on an encoded qubit. Our use of csQPT allows for the reconstruction of Kraus operators for the larger Hilbert space rather than being limited to the logical subspace. This approach enables us to more accurately identify and quantify the various error mechanisms that can lead to gate infidelity, including those occurring outside of the computational subspace. We showcase the potential of our approach by demonstrating the ability to quantify leakage outside of the computational subspace, a key factor for developing more robust and reliable quantum gates in high-dimensional systems. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Quantum process tomography is a procedure by which the unknown dynamical evolution of an open quantum system can be fully experimentally characterized. We demonstrate explicitly how this procedure can be implemented with a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer. This allows us to measure the fidelity of a controlled-NOT logic gate and to experimentally investigate the error model for our computer. Based on the latter analysis, we test an important assumption underlying many models of quantum error correction, the independence of errors on different qubits.