Abstract. We generalize the universally composable definition of Canetti to the Quantum World. The basic idea is the same as in the classical world. The main contribution is that we unfold the result in a new model which is well adapted to quantum protocols. We also simplify some aspects of the classical case. In particular, the case of protocols with an arbitrary number of layers of sub-protocols is naturally covered in the proposed model. 1
Abstract. We generalize the universally composable definition of Canetti to the Quantum World. The basic idea is the same as in the classical world. The main contribution is that we unfold the result in a new model which is well adapted to quantum protocols. We also simplify some aspects of the classical case. In particular, the case of protocols with an arbitrary number of layers of sub-protocols is naturally covered in the proposed model. 1
We propose a novel paradigm for defining security of cryptographic protocols, called universally composable security. The salient property of universally composable definitions of security is that they guarantee security even when a secure protocol is composed of an arbitrary set of protocols, or more generally when the protocol is used as a component of an arbitrary system. This is an essential property for maintaining security of cryptographic protocols in complex and unpredictable environments such as the Internet. In particular, universally composable definitions guarantee security even when an unbounded number of protocol instances are executed concurrently in an adversarially controlled manner, they guarantee non-malleability with respect to arbitrary protocols, and more. We show how to formulate universally composable definitions of security for practically any cryptographic task. Furthermore, we demonstrate that practically any such definition can be realized using known techniques, as long as only a minority of the participants are corrupted. We then proceed to formulate universally composable definitions of a wide array of cryptographic tasks, including authenticated and secure communication, key-exchange, public-key encryption, signature, commitment, oblivious transfer, zero knowledge and more. We also make initial steps towards studying the realizability of the proposed definitions in various settings.
Introduced by Canetti in 2001, Universal Composability (UC) is a widely adopted security model that enables the specification and proof of security for a broad range of protocols, offering strong security guarantees. At its core lies the universal composition theorem (UC theorem), which ensures that protocols proven secure within the framework remain secure even when deployed in real-world environments with multiple instances of them. In this work, we present two key contributions. First, we identify several problems with the UC framework, in particular the UC Theorem. They include counterexamples, limitations that make it unusable for important classes of protocols, and weaknesses in its proof. These problems reveal flaws in nearly all the fundamental concepts of UC. Second, we propose a revised formulation of the main concepts of UC to address these issues. Although the resulting modifications are nontrivial, our updated definitions are designed to remain as faithful as possible to the structure and intent of the original model.
Recently, Canetti and Krawczyk (Eurocrypt'2001) formu- lated a notion of security for key-exchange (ke) protocols, called SK- security, and showed that this notion suffices for constructing secure channels. However, their model and proofs do not suffice for proving more general composability properties of SK-secure ke protocols. We show that while the notion of SK-security is strictly weaker than a fully-idealized notion of key exchange security, it is sufficiently robust for providing secure composition with arbitrary protocols. In particular, SK-security guarantees the security of the key for any application that desires to set-up secret keys between pairs of parties. We also provide new definitions of secure-channels protocols with similarly strong com- posability properties, and show that SK-security suffices for obtaining these definitions. To obtain these results we use the recently proposed framework of uni- versally composable (UC) security. We also use a new tool, called non- information oracles, which will probably find applications beyond the present case. These tools allow us to bridge between seemingly limited indistinguishability-based definitions such as SK-security and more pow- erful, simulation-based definitions, such as UC security, where general composition theorems can be proven. Furthermore, based on such compo- sition theorems we reduce the analysis of a full-fledged multi-session key- exchange protocol to the (simpler) analysis of individual, stand-alone, key-exchange sessions.
Concurrent general composition relates to a setting where a secure protocol is run in a network concurrently with other, arbitrary protocols. Clearly, security in such a setting is what is desired, or even needed, in modern computer networks where many different protocols are executed concurrently. Our main result is a proof that security under concurrent general composition is equivalent to a relaxed variant of universal composability (where the only difference relates to the order of quantifiers in the definition). An important corollary of this theorem is that existing impossibility results for universal composability (or actually its relaxed variant) are inherent in any definition achieving security under concurrent general composition. We stress that the impossibility results obtained are not "black-box", and apply even to non-black-box simulation. Our main result also demonstrates that the definition of universal composability is somewhat "minimal", in that the composition guarantee provided by universal composability (almost) implies the definition itself. This indicates that the security definition of universal composability is not overly restrictive.
If we combine two secure cryptographic systems, is the resulting system still secure?Answering this question is highly nontrivial and has recently sparked a considerable research effort, in particular, in the area of classical cryptography.A central insight was that the answer to the question is yes, but only within a well-specified composability framework and for carefully chosen security definitions.In this article, we review several aspects of composability in the context of quantum cryptography.The first part is devoted to key distribution.We discuss the security criteria that a quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol must fulfill to allow its safe use within a larger security application (e.g. for secure message transmission); and we demonstrate-by an explicit example-what can go wrong if conventional (non-composable) security definitions are used.Finally, to illustrate the practical use of composability, we show how to generate a continuous key stream by sequentially composing rounds of a QKD protocol.In the second part, we take a more general point of view, which is necessary for the study of cryptographic situations involving, for example, mutually distrustful parties.We explain the universal composability (UC) framework and state the composition theorem that guarantees that secure protocols can securely be composed to larger applications.We focus on the secure composition of quantum protocols into unconditionally secure classical protocols.However, the resulting security definition is so strict that some tasks become impossible without additional security assumptions.Quantum bit commitment is impossible in the UC framework even with mere computational security.Similar problems arise in the quantum bounded storage model and we observe a trade-off between the UC and the use of the weakest possible security assumptions.
Yao et al. (A note on the feasibility of generalized universal composability.Theory and Applications of Models of Computationpp. 474–485, 2007; A note on the feasibility of generalised universal composability.Mathematical Structures in Computer Science,19(1), pp. 193–205) claimed a potential limitation on the class of protocols that could be securely implemented in the generalized universal composability (GUC) framework proposed by Canetti et al. (Universally composable security with global setup.Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 61–85, 2007). Specifically, Yao et al. presented a concrete attack on a GUC Zero Knowledge (GUCZK) protocol, a natural adaptation Blum's ZK proof for Directed Hamiltonicity using the general GUC feasibility of Canetti et al. (Universally composable security with global setup.Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 61–85, 2007). Interestingly, the attack was not analysed in the GUC model in Yao et al. (A note on the feasibility of generalised universal composability.Mathematical Structures in Computer Science19(1), pp. 193–205, 2009) but in theFUC model, a new UC-like framework proposed in the same work. Nonetheless, Yao et al. (A note on the feasibility of generalised universal composability.Mathematical Structures in Computer Science19(1), pp. 193–205, 2009) argued that, in light of this attack, GUC would lose its concurrent general composability and proof of knowledge properties. Concretely, they argue that GUC composability would now be with respect to some adversaries with limited access to external arbitrary protocols. In this work, we show that the claimed attack from Yao et al. is indeed harmless and does not contradict the security of the mentioned GUCZK protocol, thus restoring the general feasibility for GUC.