Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0407145 · AIP conference proceedings

Tracing the bounds on Bell-type inequalities

Stefan Filipp

Published Jan 1, 2005• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Bell‐type inequalities and violations thereof reveal the fundamental differences between standard probability theory and its quantum counterpart. In the course of previous investigations ultimate bounds on quantum mechanical violations have been found. For example, Tsirelson’s bound constitutes a global upper limit for quantum violations of the Clauser‐Horne‐Shimony‐Holt (CHSH) and the Clauser‐Horne (CH) inequalities. Here we investigate a method for calculating the precise quantum bounds on arbitrary Bell‐type inequalities by solving the eigenvalue problem for the operator associated with each Bell‐type inequality. Thereby, we use the min‐max principle to calculate the norm of these self‐adjoint operators from the maximal eigenvalue yielding the upper bound for a particular set of measurement parameters. The eigenvectors corresponding to the maximal eigenvalues provide the quantum state for which a Bell‐type inequality is maximally violated.

DOI
10.1063/1.1874561

Related papers

Tracing the bounds on Bell-type inequalities

Stefan Filipp, Karl Svozil

Bell-type inequalities and violations thereof reveal the fundamental differences between standard probability theory and its quantum counterpart. In the course of previous investigations ultimate bounds on quantum mechanical violations have been found. For example, Tsirelson's bound constitutes a global upper limit for quantum violations of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) and the Clauser-Horne (CH) inequalities. Here we investigate a method for calculating the precise quantum bounds on arbitrary Bell-type inequalities by solving the eigenvalue problem for the operator associated with each Bell-type inequality. Thereby, we use the min-max principle to calculate the norm of these self-adjoint operators from the maximal eigenvalue yielding the upper bound for a particular set of measurement parameters. The eigenvectors corresponding to the maximal eigenvalues provide the quantum state for which a Bell-type inequality is maximally violated.

•Jan 1, 2004•9 citations

Maximal violation of Bell inequalities for mixed states

Samuel L. Braunstein, A. Mann, M. Revzen

We show that mixed states can produce maximal violations in the Bell inequality due to Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH). This follows from the degeneracy of the operator which is naturally associated with the Bell inequality (here called the Bell operator). We have calculated the form of all the eigenvalues for the generic CHSH Bell operator. Finally, we consider several examples which demonstrate the utility of studying the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Bell operator.

Physical Review Letters•Jun 1, 1992•456 citations

Generalizing Tsirelson's Bound on Bell Inequalities Using a Min-Max Principle

Stefan Filipp, Karl Svozil

Bounds on the norm of quantum operators associated with classical Bell-type inequalities can be derived from their maximal eigenvalues. This quantitative method enables detailed predictions of the maximal violations of Bell-type inequalities.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403175•Physical Review Letters•Sep 23, 2004•37 citations

A Bell inequality which can be used to test locality more simply than Clauser-Horne inequality and which is violated by a larger magnitude of violation than Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality

M. Ardehali

A correlation inequality is derived from local realism and a supplementary assumption. Unlike Clauser-Horne (CH) inequality [or Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality] which is violated by quantum mechanics by a factor of $\sqrt 2$, this inequality is violated by a factor of 1.5. Thus the magnitude of violation of this inequality is approximately 20.7% larger than the magnitude of violation of previous inequalities. Moreover, unlike CH (or CHSH) inequality which requires the measurement of five detection probabilities, the present inequality requires the measurement of only two detection probabilities. This inequality can therefore be used to test locality more simply than CH or CHSH inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/9709043•Sep 19, 1997•0 citations

Tsirelson's gräns : Introduktion och Exempel

Kaarna, Amanda

Tsirelson's bound is the upper bound for a Bell inequality which is valid for all quantum mechanical systems. We discuss why Tsirelson's bound was developed by looking at some historical arguments in quantum physics, such as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, an argument for the quantum mechanical description of physical reality being incomplete, and local hidden variables. We present the counterargument to those theories, Bell's inequality, which later expanded to include any inequality that a local system fulfills, but that an entangled quantum system can violate. We present the proof of two specific Bell inequalities: the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality and the I3322 inequality. Then the Tsirelson's bound for the CHSH inequality is proven with a simple system of two entangled spin-1/2 particles and with a general argument that is valid for all entangled systems. We give the upper quantum bound for the generalized CHSH inequality, which describes the situation that we have more than two measurement options, by using semidefinite programming. We prove the Tsirelson's bound for the I3322 inequality by using maximally entangled systems and semidefinite programming. Finally, we discuss the upper bounds that are obtained from these different methods.

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Exclusivity principle and the quantum bound of the Bell inequality

Adán Cabello

We show that, for general probabilistic theories admitting sharp measurements, the exclusivity principle together with two assumptions exactly singles out the Tsirelson bound of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell inequality.

arXiv:1406.5656•Physical Review A•Dec 22, 2014•26 citations
Bell‐type inequalities and violations thereof reveal the fundamental differences between standard probability theory and its quantum counterpart. In the course of previous investigations ultimate bounds on quantum mechanical violations have been found. For example, Tsirelson’s bound constitutes a global upper limit for quantum violations of the Clauser‐Horne‐Shimony‐Holt (CHSH) and the Clauser‐Horne (CH) inequalities. Here we investigate a method for calculating the precise quantum bounds on arbitrary Bell‐type inequalities by solving the eigenvalue problem for the operator associated with each Bell‐type inequality. Thereby, we use the min‐max principle to calculate the norm of these self‐adjoint operators from the maximal eigenvalue yielding the upper bound for a particular set of measurement parameters. The eigenvectors corresponding to the maximal eigenvalues provide the quantum state for which a Bell‐type inequality is maximally violated.
Bell-type inequalities and violations thereof reveal the fundamental differences between standard probability theory and its quantum counterpart. In the course of previous investigations ultimate bounds on quantum mechanical violations have been found. For example, Tsirelson's bound constitutes a global upper limit for quantum violations of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) and the Clauser-Horne (CH) inequalities. Here we investigate a method for calculating the precise quantum bounds on arbitrary Bell-type inequalities by solving the eigenvalue problem for the operator associated with each Bell-type inequality. Thereby, we use the min-max principle to calculate the norm of these self-adjoint operators from the maximal eigenvalue yielding the upper bound for a particular set of measurement parameters. The eigenvectors corresponding to the maximal eigenvalues provide the quantum state for which a Bell-type inequality is maximally violated.
A correlation inequality is derived from local realism and a supplementary assumption. Unlike Clauser-Horne (CH) inequality [or Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality] which is violated by quantum mechanics by a factor of 2\sqrt 22​, this inequality is violated by a factor of 1.5. Thus the magnitude of violation of this inequality is approximately 20.7% larger than the magnitude of violation of previous inequalities. Moreover, unlike CH (or CHSH) inequality which requires the measurement of five detection probabilities, the present inequality requires the measurement of only two detection probabilities. This inequality can therefore be used to test locality more simply than CH or CHSH inequality.
Tsirelson's bound is the upper bound for a Bell inequality which is valid for all quantum mechanical systems. We discuss why Tsirelson's bound was developed by looking at some historical arguments in quantum physics, such as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, an argument for the quantum mechanical description of physical reality being incomplete, and local hidden variables. We present the counterargument to those theories, Bell's inequality, which later expanded to include any inequality that a local system fulfills, but that an entangled quantum system can violate. We present the proof of two specific Bell inequalities: the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality and the I3322 inequality. Then the Tsirelson's bound for the CHSH inequality is proven with a simple system of two entangled spin-1/2 particles and with a general argument that is valid for all entangled systems. We give the upper quantum bound for the generalized CHSH inequality, which describes the situation that we have more than two measurement options, by using semidefinite programming. We prove the Tsirelson's bound for the I3322 inequality by using maximally entangled systems and semidefinite programming. Finally, we discuss the upper bounds that are obtained from these different methods.