Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0406026

Phase-space approach to Berry's phases

Dariusz Chruściński

Published Jun 4, 2004• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose a new formula for the adiabatic Berry phase which is based on phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics. This approach sheds a new light into the correspondence between classical and quantum adiabatic phases -- both phases are related with the averaging procedure: Hannay's angle with averaging over the classical torus and Berry's phase with averaging over the entire classical phase space with respect to the corresponding Wigner function. Generalizations to the non-abelian Wilczek--Zee case and mixed states are also included.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0406026

Related papers

Phase-Space Approach to Berry Phases

Dariusz Chruściński

We propose a new formula for the adiabatic Berry phase which is based on phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics. This approach sheds a new light onto the correspondence between classical and quantum adiabatic phases — both phases are related with the averaging procedure: Hannay angle with averaging over the classical torus and Berry phase with averaging over the entire classical phase space with respect to the corresponding Wigner function.

Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Mar 1, 2006•3 citations

The Berry phase and the Hannay angle

Gautam Kumar Ghosh, Binayak Dutta-Roy

The analysis provided by Berry of the extra phase acquired by a system undergoing adiabatic excursion in a closed path in parameter space is extended in this paper to the case of nonstationary states. It is shown that, for certain integrable dynamical systems, wave packets exist which under continuation in parameter space behave in a manner that can be understood entirely in classical terms, thus providing a connection between the quantum adiabatic phase and the classical Hannay angle shifts.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Mar 15, 1988•15 citations

Quantum and classical geometric phase of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator

Xiang‐Bin Wang, L. C. Kwek, C. H. Oh

In a recent paper [Y. C. Ge and M. S. Child, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2507 (1997)], by using a Gaussian wave function, Ge and Child presented a nonadiabatic relation between the quantum Berry phase and the classical Hannay angle for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator. In this paper, we present a perspective for this relation without the use of a trial wave function. In particular, an exact explicit formula for the cyclic evolution over the period T in the parameter space of action invariant is obtained; the $\ensuremath{-}(n+1/2)$ relation between the quantum geometric angle and the Hannay angle is rigorously established.

Physical Review A•Aug 15, 2000•16 citations

REALIZATION OF BERRY’S PHASE AND HANNAY’S ANGLE THROUGH CANONICAL TRANSFORMATIONS

Sagarika Biswas, K. DATTA, S. Rai Choudhury

A new relationship between Berry’s phase and Hannay’s angle (which is its classical counterpart) is established. This relationship is exact and does not depend on semiclassical arguments, though in this note the aforementioned relationship is proved only for a restricted class of Hamiltonians. It is shown that if a Hamiltonian, for which Berry’s phase and Hannay’s angle are nonvanishing, can, in classical theory, be canonically transformed into one for which both are zero, the generating function of this canonical transformation yields, through appropriate averages, both the quantal geometrical phase and its classical analog.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Jun 20, 1994•1 citation

Berry phases for quadratic spin Hamiltonians taken from atomic and solid state physics: examples of Abelian gauge fields not connected to physical particles

Claude C. Bouchiat

This paper contains an evaluation of the Berry phases associated with the following class of nonlinear spin Hamiltonians : H (B, n ) = γS S · B + γQ((S · n) 2 - S2/3), with B · n = 0. Examples of these Hamiltonians are given in Atomic and Solid State Physics. We compute exactly the Berry phases for S = 1, 3/2 and for S > 3/2, to second order with respect to the ratio γQ/(γS B ). The results involve loop integrals of an Abelian gauge field which can be considered as a generalization of the magnetic monopole field, the projective complex plane P2(C) playing the role of the sphere S2. In the case of the spin-1 the relation between the Aharonov and Anandan cyclic quantum phase and the Berry adiabatic phase is made explicit. The connection between the semiclassical limit of the Berry phase and the classical adiabatic Hannay angle is analyzed using the classical spin model recently proposed by Nielsen and Rohrlich.

Journal de physique•Jan 1, 1989•6 citations

Relation between the Berry phase in quantum hermitian and non-hermitian systems and the Hannay phase in the equivalent classical systems

Huner Fanchiotti A, Carlos A. García Canal, Miguel Angel Mayosky +2 more

The well-known geometric phase present in the quantum adiabatic evolution discovered by Berry many years ago has its analogue, the Hannay phase, in the classical domain.We calculate the Berry phase with examples for quantum hermitian and non-hermitian $PT$-symmetric Hamiltonians and compare with the Hannay phase in their classical equivalents.We use the analogy to propose resonant electric circuits which reproduce the theoretical solutions in simulated laboratory experiments.

arXiv:2209.13630•Sep 27, 2022•0 citations
We propose a new formula for the adiabatic Berry phase which is based on phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics. This approach sheds a new light into the correspondence between classical and quantum adiabatic phases -- both phases are related with the averaging procedure: Hannay's angle with averaging over the classical torus and Berry's phase with averaging over the entire classical phase space with respect to the corresponding Wigner function. Generalizations to the non-abelian Wilczek--Zee case and mixed states are also included.
In a recent paper [Y. C. Ge and M. S. Child, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2507 (1997)], by using a Gaussian wave function, Ge and Child presented a nonadiabatic relation between the quantum Berry phase and the classical Hannay angle for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator. In this paper, we present a perspective for this relation without the use of a trial wave function. In particular, an exact explicit formula for the cyclic evolution over the period T in the parameter space of action invariant is obtained; the $\ensuremath{-}(n+1/2)$ relation between the quantum geometric angle and the Hannay angle is rigorously established.
A new relationship between Berry’s phase and Hannay’s angle (which is its classical counterpart) is established. This relationship is exact and does not depend on semiclassical arguments, though in this note the aforementioned relationship is proved only for a restricted class of Hamiltonians. It is shown that if a Hamiltonian, for which Berry’s phase and Hannay’s angle are nonvanishing, can, in classical theory, be canonically transformed into one for which both are zero, the generating function of this canonical transformation yields, through appropriate averages, both the quantal geometrical phase and its classical analog.
This paper contains an evaluation of the Berry phases associated with the following class of nonlinear spin Hamiltonians : H (B, n ) = γS S · B + γQ((S · n) 2 - S2/3), with B · n = 0. Examples of these Hamiltonians are given in Atomic and Solid State Physics. We compute exactly the Berry phases for S = 1, 3/2 and for S > 3/2, to second order with respect to the ratio γQ/(γS B ). The results involve loop integrals of an Abelian gauge field which can be considered as a generalization of the magnetic monopole field, the projective complex plane P2(C) playing the role of the sphere S2. In the case of the spin-1 the relation between the Aharonov and Anandan cyclic quantum phase and the Berry adiabatic phase is made explicit. The connection between the semiclassical limit of the Berry phase and the classical adiabatic Hannay angle is analyzed using the classical spin model recently proposed by Nielsen and Rohrlich.
The well-known geometric phase present in the quantum adiabatic evolution discovered by Berry many years ago has its analogue, the Hannay phase, in the classical domain.We calculate the Berry phase with examples for quantum hermitian and non-hermitian PTPTPT-symmetric Hamiltonians and compare with the Hannay phase in their classical equivalents.We use the analogy to propose resonant electric circuits which reproduce the theoretical solutions in simulated laboratory experiments.