We previously suggested that photon exchange interactions could be used to produce nonlinear effects at the two-photon level, and similar effects have been experimentally observed by Resch et al. (e-print quant-ph/0306198). Here we note that photon exchange interactions are not useful for quantum information processing because they require the presence of substantial photon loss. This dependence on loss is somewhat analogous to the postselection required in the linear optics approach to quantum computing suggested by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001)].
We previously suggested that photon exchange interactions could be used to produce nonlinear effects at the two-photon level, and similar effects have been experimentally observed by Resch et al. (e-print quant-ph/0306198). Here we note that photon exchange interactions are not useful for quantum information processing because they require the presence of substantial photon loss. This dependence on loss is somewhat analogous to the postselection required in the linear optics approach to quantum computing suggested by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001)].
Photonics is a promising architecture for the realisation of quantum information processing, since the two-photon interaction, or non-linearity, necessary to build logical gates can efficiently be realised by the use of interference with ancillary photons and detection 1 Knill, E, Laflamme, R and Milburn, GJ. 2001. Nature, 409: 46–52. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. Although single-photon sources and detectors are pivotal in realisations of such systems, clear guidelines for the required performance of realistic systems are yet to be defined. We present our detailed numerical simulation of several quantum optics circuits including sources and detectors all represented in multi-dimensional Fock-spaces, which allows us to obtain experimentally realistic performance bounds for these devices. In addition, the single-photon source based on switched parametric down-conversion is studied, which in principle could reach the required performance. Three approaches for implementing the switching hierarchy of the photons are simulated, and their anticipated performance is obtained. Our results define the bar for the optical devices needed to achieve the first level of linear-optics quantum computing outside the coincidence basis.
Nonlinear interactions between two photons are required for the construction of optical quantum logic gates, but those interactions are normally very weak due to the small magnitude of the electric field associated with a single photon. We note that exchange interactions can have a large effect even when there is no physical interaction between two particles, and we exploit this property for the construction of optical quantum logic gates. We show that the probability of there being two virtually-excited atoms in a medium can be a factor of 2 larger when two nonresonant photons propagate through the same medium as compared to the case in which they propagate through two separate media, in analogy with photon bunching. As a result, the application of one or more laser pulses will produce a nonlinear phase shift that can be used to construct an XOR quantum logic gate. This provides an example of a quantum control process in which one photon can control the state of another photon even when there is no sequence of physical interactions linking the two photons. From a classical point of view, it is not possible to identify a path for the flow of information or a specific cause for the outcome of the control process.
Nonlinear interactions between two photons would have many potential applications, including the implementation of quantum logic gates for use in quantum computing. We are investigating a new mechanism for nonlinear optics at the two-photon level that is based on the exchange of photons by pairs of atoms in a medium, such as an atomic vapor. The effect can be understood as being due to a factor of two increase in the probability of having two excited atoms in the medium compared to the case in which the two photons propagate in two separate media. These effects are expected to be sufficiently large that cavities and traps should not be required, which may eventually allow the construction of large numbers of simple quantum logic gates. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Ever since Knill, Laflamme and Milburn [Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001)] showed that nondeterministic quantum logic operations could be performed with linear optical elements, additional photons (ancilla) and projective measurements, the idea of linear-optics quantum computation has attracted considerable interest. Our group has recently demonstrated several devices of this kind. We give an overview of recent experimental results, including the quantum parity check, the destructive controlled-NOT, and a cyclical quantum memory. The need for high-efficiency detection of single photons, and for detectors capable of distinguishing photon number will be discussed. Some experimental improvements towards meeting that need will be presented.
Compared with other physical platforms for Quantum Information Processing (QIP), photons have the unique advantages of travelling over free-space links or optical fiber with relatively low decoherence and of propagating with minimal coupling to the environment, while also being easily coupled to existing telecommunications technology. The R&D of various single photon and entangled photon generation technologies and the linear-optical implementations of quantum computation and communication are now surveyed and analyzed in a structured manner. We discuss photonic qubit degrees of freedom (polarization, time-bin, path, frequency and Orbital angular momentum), determine sources such as deterministic quantum-dot based sources and probabilistic sources based on spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC), and review architectures for Linear Optical Quantum Computation (LOQC), such as the Knill–Laflamme–Milburn (KLM) protocol and measurement-based quantum computation. Building on the density-matrix treatment of biexciton–exciton coherent dynamics in semiconductor quantum dots, we recapitulate the development of two-pulse coherent control schemes for generation and readout of photonic qubits in these systems and how they have been stretched towards optical control of logic gates. A comparative performance framework is established along the lines of source brightness, entanglement fidelity, photon indistinguishability, channel loss and scalability, which is illustrated by simulated performance plots and tabulated against literature numbers. Remaining hurdles in the field regarding issues of photon loss, scalable multiplexing, deterministic two-qubit interaction, and its integration with a quantum memory are highlighted and a perspective is provided on hybrid photonic–matter architectures for fault-tolerant quantum networks.
In the previous chapter we developed some of the basic aspects of quantum information processing with single photons as qubits. Apart from noting the obvious benefit of using light for quantum communication, we identified some difficulties in manipulating quantum information that is encoded in photons. In particular, it is difficult to construct two-qubit gates for photonic qubits. In this chapter we will have to face this difficulty head-on in our discussion of quantum computation with single photons and linear-optical elements. The possibility of a quantum computer based on single photons, linear optics, and photon counting was demonstrated in a landmark paper by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn in 2001. Their protocol is commonly referred to as the ‘ klm protocol’. In subsequent years, the klm protocol has been dramatically slimmed down in terms of complexity and the necessary resources to create the universal set of quantum gates. For pedagogical reasons we give the streamlined version here, and we briefly describe the original klm protocol in Appendix 2. We will make extensive use of the results in Section 1.4 about mode transformations, and Section 2.3 about cluster-state quantum computing. We start this chapter, however, with a description of linear-optical networks, and how they fail as deterministic quantum computers. In Section 6.2 we discuss the principle of post-selection, and how this can be used to create probabilistic gates with deterministic feed-forward control.