Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0405018 · Journal of Complexity

Improved bounds on the randomized and quantum complexity of initial-value problems

Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz

Published Aug 27, 2005• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.jco.2005.05.003

Related papers

The randomized complexity of initial value problems

Stefan Heinrich, Bernhard Milla

Journal of Complexity•Sep 26, 2007•36 citations

Almost optimal solution of initial-value problems by randomized and quantum algorithms

Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz

We establish essentially optimal bounds on the complexity of initial-value problems in the randomized and quantum settings. We define for this purpose a sequence of new algorithms, whose error/cost properties improve from step to step. This leads to new upper complexity bounds, which differ from known lower bounds only by an arbitrarily small positive parameter in the exponent, and a logarithmic factor. In both randomized and quantum settings, initial-value problems turn out to be essentially as difficult as scalar integration.

Journal of Complexity•Oct 1, 2006•32 citations

Almost optimal solution of initial-value problems by randomized and quantum algorithms

Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz

Journal of Complexity•May 12, 2006•70 citations

Almost Optimal Solution of Initial-Value Problems by Randomized and Quantum Algorithms

Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz

We establish essentially optimal bounds on the complexity of initial-value problems in the randomized and quantum settings. For this purpose we define a sequence of new algorithms whose error/cost properties improve from step to step. These algorithms yield new upper complexity bounds, which differ from known lower bounds by only an arbitrarily small positive parameter in the exponent, and a logarithmic factor. In both the randomized and quantum settings, initial-value problems turn out to be essentially as difficult as scalar integration.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510045•Oct 6, 2005•0 citations

Randomized and quantum algorithms yield a speed-up for initial-value problems

Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz

arXiv:quant-ph/0311148•Journal of Complexity•Dec 1, 2004•30 citations

Randomized and Quantum Solution of Initial-Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations of Order k

Marek Szczęsny

We study possible advantages of randomized and quantum computing over deterministic computing for scalar initial-value problems for ordinary differential equations of order k. For systems of equations of the first order this question has been settled modulo some details in \cite{Kacewicz05}. A speed-up over deterministic computing shown in \cite{Kacewicz05} is related to the increased regularity of the solution with respect to that of the right-hand side function. For a scalar equation of order k (which can be transformed into a special system of the first order), the regularity of the solution is increased by k orders of magnitude. This leads to improved complexity bounds depending on k for linear information in the deterministic setting, see \cite{Szczesny05}. This may suggest that in the randomized and quantum settings a speed-up can also be achieved depending on k. We show in this paper that a speed-up dependent on k is not possible in the randomized and quantum settings. We establish lower complexity bounds, showing that the randomized and quantum complexities remain at the some level as for systems of the first order, no matter how large k is. Thus, the algorithms from \cite{Kacewicz05} remain (almost) optimal, even if we restrict ourselves to a subclass of systems arising from scalar equations of order k.

arXiv:quant-ph/0612085•Dec 13, 2006•0 citations
We establish essentially optimal bounds on the complexity of initial-value problems in the randomized and quantum settings. We define for this purpose a sequence of new algorithms, whose error/cost properties improve from step to step. This leads to new upper complexity bounds, which differ from known lower bounds only by an arbitrarily small positive parameter in the exponent, and a logarithmic factor. In both randomized and quantum settings, initial-value problems turn out to be essentially as difficult as scalar integration.
We establish essentially optimal bounds on the complexity of initial-value problems in the randomized and quantum settings. For this purpose we define a sequence of new algorithms whose error/cost properties improve from step to step. These algorithms yield new upper complexity bounds, which differ from known lower bounds by only an arbitrarily small positive parameter in the exponent, and a logarithmic factor. In both the randomized and quantum settings, initial-value problems turn out to be essentially as difficult as scalar integration.
We study possible advantages of randomized and quantum computing over deterministic computing for scalar initial-value problems for ordinary differential equations of order k. For systems of equations of the first order this question has been settled modulo some details in \cite{Kacewicz05}. A speed-up over deterministic computing shown in \cite{Kacewicz05} is related to the increased regularity of the solution with respect to that of the right-hand side function. For a scalar equation of order k (which can be transformed into a special system of the first order), the regularity of the solution is increased by k orders of magnitude. This leads to improved complexity bounds depending on k for linear information in the deterministic setting, see \cite{Szczesny05}. This may suggest that in the randomized and quantum settings a speed-up can also be achieved depending on k. We show in this paper that a speed-up dependent on k is not possible in the randomized and quantum settings. We establish lower complexity bounds, showing that the randomized and quantum complexities remain at the some level as for systems of the first order, no matter how large k is. Thus, the algorithms from \cite{Kacewicz05} remain (almost) optimal, even if we restrict ourselves to a subclass of systems arising from scalar equations of order k.