Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0404067

A Note on the Quantum Query Complexity of the Hidden Subgroup Problem

Troels Windfeldt

Published Apr 11, 2004• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We are concerned with the Hidden Subgroup Problem for finite groups. We present a simplified analysis of a quantum algorithm proposed by Hallgren, Russell and Ta-Shma as well as a detailed proof of a lower bound on the probability of success of the algorithm.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0404067

Related papers

The Hidden Subgroup Problem - Review and Open Problems

Chris Lomont

An overview of quantum computing and in particular the Hidden Subgroup Problem are presented from a mathematical viewpoint. Detailed proofs are supplied for many important results from the literature, and notation is unified, making it easier to absorb the background necessary to begin research on the Hidden Subgroup Problem. Proofs are provided which give very concrete algorithms and bounds for the finite abelian case with little outside references, and future directions are provided for the nonabelian case. This summary is current as of October 2004.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411037•Nov 4, 2004•55 citations

The quantum query complexity of the hidden subgroup problem is polynomial

Mark Ettinger, Peter Høyer, Emanuel H. Knill

arXiv:quant-ph/0401083•Information Processing Letters•May 13, 2004•147 citations

The quantum query complexity of the abelian hidden subgroup problem

Pascal Koiran, Vincent Nesme, Natacha Portier

Theoretical Computer Science•Mar 2, 2007•20 citations

Quantum mechanical algorithms for the nonabelian hidden subgroup problem

Michelangelo Grigni, Leonard J. Schulman, Monica Vazirani +1 more

We provide positive and negative results concerning the “standard method” of identifying a hidden subgroup of a nonabelian group using a quantum computer.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jul 6, 2001•121 citations

Finding hidden Borel subgroups of the general linear group

IvanyosGábor

We present a quantum algorithm for solving the hidden subgroup problem in the general linear group over a finite field where the hidden subgroup is promised to be a conjugate of the group of the in...

Quantum Information and Computation•Jul 1, 2012•0 citations

The Hidden Subgroup Problem in Semidirect Products and Quasi-Hamiltonian Groups

Mauro E. S. Morales

Several early quantum algorithms, including Simon's algorithm and Shor's period-finding are instances of the hidden subgroup problem (HSP) over finite abelian groups. No polynomial-time quantum algorithm is known for the HSP over arbitrary non-abelian finite groups. The non-Abelian case is of particular interest because some instances, such as the dihedral and symmetric group HSPs, are connected to lattice problems and graph isomorphism, respectively. In this work, we give polynomial-time quantum algorithms for two further families containing non-Abelian groups. First, we consider groups of the form $G=A\rtimes_{\varphi} \mathbb{Z}_{p^k}$, with $A$ finite Abelian, $p$ prime, $k\in \mathbb{N}$ and the action of $\mathbb Z_{p^k}$ is generated by the scalar automorphism $a\mapstoμa$, for some $μ\in\mathbb Z_{\operatorname{Exp}(A)}^\times$, where $\mathrm{Exp}(A)$ is the exponent of $A$. Our algorithm is efficient when $A$ has bounded generator rank and $\mathrm{Exp}(A)/p=\mathrm{polylog}(|G|)$. This includes the case $A=\mathbb{Z}_N$ for $N\in\mathbb{N}$ and $k=1$, studied by Bacon, Childs and van Dam (FOCS 2005), and $A=\mathbb{Z}_{q^r}$ with $q$ prime and $r\in \mathbb{N}$ studied by van Dam and Dey (TQC 2014). Second, we give a polynomial-time quantum algorithm for finite quasi-Hamiltonian groups under a mild assumption on the input structure. Quasi-Hamiltonian groups are finite nilpotent groups with modular subgroup lattice, or equivalently the finite groups in which every subgroup is permutable. As far as we know, this is the first quantum algorithm to exploit the modularity of the subgroup lattice for solving the HSP. This extends, under the aforementioned structured input assumption, the quantum algorithm for Dedekind groups given by Hallgren, Russell, and Ta-Shma (SIAM J. Comput. 32, 2003).

quant-pharXiv:2608.05321•Aug 7, 2026•0 citations
An overview of quantum computing and in particular the Hidden Subgroup Problem are presented from a mathematical viewpoint. Detailed proofs are supplied for many important results from the literature, and notation is unified, making it easier to absorb the background necessary to begin research on the Hidden Subgroup Problem. Proofs are provided which give very concrete algorithms and bounds for the finite abelian case with little outside references, and future directions are provided for the nonabelian case. This summary is current as of October 2004.
Several early quantum algorithms, including Simon's algorithm and Shor's period-finding are instances of the hidden subgroup problem (HSP) over finite abelian groups. No polynomial-time quantum algorithm is known for the HSP over arbitrary non-abelian finite groups. The non-Abelian case is of particular interest because some instances, such as the dihedral and symmetric group HSPs, are connected to lattice problems and graph isomorphism, respectively. In this work, we give polynomial-time quantum algorithms for two further families containing non-Abelian groups. First, we consider groups of the form G=A⋊φZpkG=A\rtimes_{\varphi} \mathbb{Z}_{p^k}G=A⋊φ​Zpk​, with AAA finite Abelian, ppp prime, k∈Nk\in \mathbb{N}k∈N and the action of Zpk\mathbb Z_{p^k}Zpk​ is generated by the scalar automorphism a↦μaa\mapstoμaa↦μa, for some μ∈ZExp⁡(A)×μ\in\mathbb Z_{\operatorname{Exp}(A)}^\timesμ∈ZExp(A)×​, where Exp(A)\mathrm{Exp}(A)Exp(A) is the exponent of AAA. Our algorithm is efficient when AAA has bounded generator rank and Exp(A)/p=polylog(∣G∣)\mathrm{Exp}(A)/p=\mathrm{polylog}(|G|)Exp(A)/p=polylog(∣G∣). This includes the case A=ZNA=\mathbb{Z}_NA=ZN​ for N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}N∈N and k=1k=1k=1, studied by Bacon, Childs and van Dam (FOCS 2005), and A=ZqrA=\mathbb{Z}_{q^r}A=Zqr​ with qqq prime and r∈Nr\in \mathbb{N}r∈N studied by van Dam and Dey (TQC 2014). Second, we give a polynomial-time quantum algorithm for finite quasi-Hamiltonian groups under a mild assumption on the input structure. Quasi-Hamiltonian groups are finite nilpotent groups with modular subgroup lattice, or equivalently the finite groups in which every subgroup is permutable. As far as we know, this is the first quantum algorithm to exploit the modularity of the subgroup lattice for solving the HSP. This extends, under the aforementioned structured input assumption, the quantum algorithm for Dedekind groups given by Hallgren, Russell, and Ta-Shma (SIAM J. Comput. 32, 2003).