We study the randomized classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation, a cyclic analogue of k-Forrelation [AA15, STOC'15; BS21, STOC'21]. Given k Boolean functions f1,…,fk:F2n→{−1,1}, the goal is to estimate Tk=N−1Tr(Df1H⊗n⋯DfkH⊗n), where Dfi=diag(fi(x):x∈F2n), H is the Hadamard gate, and N=2n. This normalized-trace problem can be solved with k quantum queries in the DQC1 model. Its classical query complexity was left open in [JLS+26, FOCS'26], which conjectured a lower bound of Ω(N1−2/k).
We establish a nearly complete characterization of the nonadaptive classical query complexity of cyclic Forrelation. For even k≥4, we prove a tight bound of Θk(N1−2/k) for constant additive error. For odd k≥5, we obtain a lower bound of Ωk(N1−2/(k−1)) and an upper bound of Ok(N1−2/k). Surprisingly, k=3 admits a polylogarithmic-query nonadaptive classical algorithm, disproving the conjecture in this case. These results suggest an unexpected parity-dependent structure: the nonadaptive complexity may be governed by the independence number of the k-cycle, leading to the exponent 1−1/⌊k/2⌋, rather than the previously conjectured 1−2/k, which was motivated by a Fourier-growth heuristic. Finally, allowing adaptivity, we prove a lower bound of Ω(N1/4) for every k≥4.
Although formally close to k-Forrelation, the cyclic structure leads to rather different classical behavior and requires different techniques. Our lower bounds are based on hidden-shift collision constructions, and our upper bounds follow from randomized sampling together with cycle-specific conditional-moment estimates. Our results provide a systematic understanding of its query advantages over classical computation.
It is well known that quantum, randomized and deterministic (sequential) query complexities are polynomially related for total boolean functions. We find that significantly larger separations between the parallel generalizations of these measures are possible. In particular, 1) We employ the cheatsheet framework to obtain an unbounded parallel quantum query advantage over its randomized analogue for a total function, falsifying a conjecture of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.6116]. 2) We strengthen 1 by constructing a total function which exhibits an unbounded parallel quantum query advantage despite having no sequential advantage, suggesting that genuine quantum advantage could occur entirely due to parallelism. 3) We construct a total function that exhibits a polynomial separation between 2-round quantum and randomized query complexities, contrasting a result of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0018] that there is at most a constant separation for 1-round (nonadaptive) algorithms. 4) We develop a new technique for deriving parallel quantum lower bounds from sequential upper bounds. We employ this technique to give lower bounds for Boolean symmetric functions and read-once formulas, ruling out large parallel query advantages for them. We also provide separations between randomized and deterministic parallel query complexities analogous to items 1-3.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most q oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model:
(i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ(qε21) queries;
(ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ(qε2p(1−p)) queries;
(iii) Search among N items requires Θ(qN) queries;
(iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of m ORs, with n inputs to each OR) requires Θ(qnm) queries.
All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all q from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor.
Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.
It is well known that quantum, randomized and deterministic (sequential) query complexities are polynomially related for total boolean functions. We find that significantly larger separations between the parallel generalizations of these measures are possible. In particular, 1) We employ the cheatsheet framework to obtain an unbounded parallel quantum query advantage over its randomized analogue for a total function, falsifying a conjecture of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.6116]. 2) We strengthen 1 by constructing a total function which exhibits an unbounded parallel quantum query advantage despite having no sequential advantage, suggesting that genuine quantum advantage could occur entirely due to parallelism. 3) We construct a total function that exhibits a polynomial separation between 2-round quantum and randomized query complexities, contrasting a result of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0018] that there is at most a constant separation for 1-round (nonadaptive) algorithms. 4) We develop a new technique for deriving parallel quantum lower bounds from sequential upper bounds. We employ this technique to give lower bounds for Boolean symmetric functions and read-once formulas, ruling out large parallel query advantages for them. We also provide separations between randomized and deterministic parallel query complexities analogous to items 1-3.