A realistic theory is constructed for the GHZ experiment. It is shown that the theory is local and it reproduces all the probabilistic predictions of quantum theory. This local realistic theory shows that GHZ had formulated Einstein's locality or no-action-at-a-distance principle incorrectly in their local realistic theory for the experiment.
A realistic theory is constructed for the GHZ experiment. It is shown that the theory is local and it reproduces all the probabilistic predictions of quantum theory. This local realistic theory shows that GHZ had formulated Einstein's locality or no-action-at-a-distance principle incorrectly in their local realistic theory for the experiment.
Introduction Since its inception, fifty years ago, Bell's theorem has had a long history not only of experimental tests but also of theoretical developments. Studying pairs of correlated quantummechanical particles separated in space, in a composite “entangled” state, Bell [1] showed that the joint ascription of hidden variables and locality to the system led to an inequality that is violated by the predictions of quantum mechanics. Fifteen years later, experiments confirmed the predictions of quantum mechanics, ruling out a large class of local realist theories. One of the most meaningful theoretical developments that followed Bell's work was the Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) theorem, also known as Bell's theorem without inequalities. In 1989, the American physicists Daniel Greenberger and Michael Horne, who had been working on Bell's theorem since the late 1960s, together with the Austrian physicist Anton Zeilinger, introduced a novelty into the testing of entanglement, extending Bell's theorem in a different and interesting direction. According to Franck Laloë [2], For many years, everyone thought that Bell had basically exhausted the subject by considering all really interesting situations, and that two-spin systems provided the most spectacular quantum violations of local realism. It therefore came as a surprise to many when in 1989 Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (GHZ) showed that systems containing more than two correlated particles may actually exhibit even more dramatic violations of local realism. The trio analyzed the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen 1935 argument once again and were able to write what are now called Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) entangled states, involving three or four correlated spin-1/2 particles, leading to conflicts between local realist theories and quantum mechanics. However, unlike Bell's theorem, the conflict now was not of a statistical nature, as was the case with Bell's theorem, insofar as measurements on a single GHZ state could lead to conflicting predictions with local realistic models [3–5]. In this paper we present the history of the creation of this theorem and analyze its scope.
The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger~(GHZ) version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen~(EPR) paradox is widely regarded as a conclusive logical argument that rules out the possibility of describing quantum phenomena within the framework of a local and realistic model of hidden variables in which the observers are free to choose their own experimental settings. In this paper we show, however, that the GHZ argument implicitly relies on an additional crucial assumption, which is not required by fundamental physical principles and had gone unnoticed. Namely, we note that the argument implicitly assumes the existence of an absolute angular frame of reference with respect to which the polarization properties of the hypothetical hidden configurations of the entangled particles as well as the orientation of the measurement apparatus that test the system can be defined. We further note that such an absolute frame of reference would not exist if the hidden configurations of the entangled particles spontaneously break the gauge rotational symmetry. Indeed, by skipping this unnecessary additional assumption we are able to build an explicitly local and realistic model of hidden variables for the GHZ state, which complies with the 'free-will' hypothesis and reproduces the quantum mechanical predictions, and thus completes the description of the system in the EPR sense.
This chapter begins with a review of the ideas of locality and realism which provide the basis for the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. The general conditions defining a local, realistic theory are stated, and then used to prove Bell's theorem, which yields — for any local, realistic theory — an inequality satisfied by certain linear combinations of correlations. It is shown that this inequality is violated by quantum theory and by experiment. The chapter ends with a discussion of possible experimental loopholes and the alternative Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) state, which would, in principle, make the use of statistical correlations unnecessary.
In all local realistic theories worked out till now, locality is considered as a basic assumption. Most people in the field consider the inconsistency between local realistic theories and quantum mechanics to be a result of non-local nature of quantum mechanics. In this Paper, we derive the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger type theorem for particles with instantaneous (non-local) interactions at the hidden-variable level. Then, we show that the previous contradiction still exists between quantum mechanics and non-local hidden variable models.
The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is widely regarded as a conclusive logical argument that rules out the possibility of describing quantum phenomena within the framework of any model of local hidden variables in which the observers are free to choose their own experimental settings. In this paper, we show, however, that the GHZ argument implicitly relies on a subtle, though crucial, assumption that is not required by fundamental physical principles, and which had gone unnoticed. Namely, we note that the argument implicitly assumes the existence of an absolute angular frame of reference with respect to which the polarization properties of the hypothetical hidden configurations of the entangled particles, as well as the orientations of the measurement devices that test them, can be defined. We further note that such an absolute frame of reference may not exist if the hidden configurations of the entangled particles spontaneously break the gauge rotational symmetry. Indeed, by skipping the disputed requirement we are able to build a model of local hidden variables for the GHZ state, which complies with the 'free-will' hypothesis and reproduces the quantum mechanical predictions. Our model, thus, completes-in the EPR sense-the quantum description of the GHZ state.
Quantum physics violates the basic assumptions of local realism. Particles can be entangled with each other in ways that allow correlations stronger than possible in classical physics. This was first realized by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) in 1935 and led them to conclude that quantum theory was incomplete. It took about 30 years before J. S. Bell found observable consequences of this phenomenon by showing how entangled states violate inequalities for two-particle correlations derived purely from the assumption that the world obeys local realism. Violations of Bell inequalities were first observed experimentally in the Aspect experiment, which will be discussed below. Such experiments are technically challenging and care is needed to avoid any loopholes in the experimental setup that would still permit the description of the experiments by a local realistic theory. Bell inequalities describe violations of local realism on average, meaning that each individual experimental outcome could occur in a local realistic theory. It is the statistics of these outcomes that violates local realism. In contrast, another class of quantum states, so-called Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states, which contain three particles, can be shown to violate local realism in each measurement outcome. We will also discuss this class of states and experiments by Zeilinger's group, which demonstrated this type of violation of local realism for the first time. Our aim here is not to discuss the exact relations between quantum entanglement, non-locality and realism, and their physical and philosophical implications. While this is a highly interesting topic which attracts a lot of attention from researchers, such an exploration would go beyond the scope of this book.