Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0308101 · Modern Physics Letters A

TIME AND GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Alexei A. Abrikosov, E. Gozzi, D. Mauro

Published Nov 20, 2003• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper we briefly review the functional version of the Koopman-von Neumann operatorial approach to classical mechanics. We then show that its quantization can be achieved by freezing to zero two Grassmannian partners of time. This method of quantization presents many similarities with the one known as Geometric Quantization.
DOI
10.1142/s0217732303012568

Related papers

Quantization as a dimensional reduction phenomenon

E. Gozzi, MAURO D.

Classical mechanics, in the operatorial formulation of Koopman and von Neumann, can be written also in a functional form. This form two grassmannian partners of time make their natural appearance extending in this manner time to a three dimensional supermanifold. Quantization is then achieved by a process of dimensional reduction of this supermanifold, We prove that this procedure is equivalent to the well.known method of geometric quantization.

•Jan 1, 2006•5 citations

Quantization as a dimensional reduction phenomenon

E. Gozzi

Classical mechanics, in the operatorial formulation of Koopman and von Neumann, can be written also in a functional form. In this form two Grassmann partners of time make their natural appearance extending in this manner time to a three dimensional supermanifold. Quantization is then achieved by a process of dimensional reduction of this supermanifold. We prove that this procedure is equivalent to the well‐known method of geometric quantization.

arXiv:quant-ph/0601209•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2006•7 citations

1 Quantization and Time

Alexei A. Abrikosov, Jr. A, Ennio Gozzi B

Starting from a functional formulation of classical mechanics, we show how toperform its quantization by freezing to zero two Grassmannian partners of time.

•Jan 1, 1999•4 citations

Topics in Koopman-von Neumann Theory

D. Mauro

In this thesis we study several features of the operatorial approach to classical mechanics pionereed by Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) in the Thirties. In particular in the first part we study the role of the phases of the KvN states. We analyze, within the KvN theory, the two-slit experiment and the Aharonov-Bohm effect and we make a comparison between the classical and the quantum case. In the second part of the thesis we study the extension of the KvN formalism to the space of forms and Jacobi fields. We first show that all the standard Cartan calculus on symplectic spaces can be performed via Grassmann variables or via suitable combinations of Pauli matrices. Second we study the extended Hilbert space of KvN which now includes forms and prove that it is impossible to have at the same time a positive definite scalar product and a unitary evolution. Clear physical reasons for this phenomenon are exhibited. We conclude the thesis with some work in progress on the issue of quantization.

arXiv:quant-ph/0301172•Jan 30, 2003•70 citations

A New Quantization Map

D. Mauro

In this paper we find a simple rule to reproduce the algebra of quantum observables using only the commutators and operators which appear in the Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation of classical mechanics. The usual Hilbert space of quantum mechanics becomes embedded in the KvN Hilbert space: in particular it turns out to be the subspace on which the quantum positions Q and momenta P act irreducibly. 1

•Jan 1, 2003•7 citations

Quantization & the Koopman-von Neumann Formulation

Fritiof Wallentin

In a previous work by the author it was shown that the Koopman-von Neumann formulation of classical mechanics (KvN) exhibits quantum interference. As such it was there claimed that KvN ought to be considered as a proper quantum mechanical theory in a similar sense as ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics (OQM) is. In this article this claim is made manifest by showing that KvN and OQM can be taken as merely inequivalent representations resulting from one and the same quantization scheme. Of course, as the typical notion of quantization necessitates the canonical commutation relations (CCR) to hold, which they do not in KvN, the concept needs to be properly revised. To justify such a revision the typical reasons for necessitation the CCR, reductionism and quantization as 'turning brackets to commutators', are examined and found insufficient.

•Nov 28, 2022•0 citations
In this thesis we study several features of the operatorial approach to classical mechanics pionereed by Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) in the Thirties. In particular in the first part we study the role of the phases of the KvN states. We analyze, within the KvN theory, the two-slit experiment and the Aharonov-Bohm effect and we make a comparison between the classical and the quantum case. In the second part of the thesis we study the extension of the KvN formalism to the space of forms and Jacobi fields. We first show that all the standard Cartan calculus on symplectic spaces can be performed via Grassmann variables or via suitable combinations of Pauli matrices. Second we study the extended Hilbert space of KvN which now includes forms and prove that it is impossible to have at the same time a positive definite scalar product and a unitary evolution. Clear physical reasons for this phenomenon are exhibited. We conclude the thesis with some work in progress on the issue of quantization.
In a previous work by the author it was shown that the Koopman-von Neumann formulation of classical mechanics (KvN) exhibits quantum interference. As such it was there claimed that KvN ought to be considered as a proper quantum mechanical theory in a similar sense as ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics (OQM) is. In this article this claim is made manifest by showing that KvN and OQM can be taken as merely inequivalent representations resulting from one and the same quantization scheme. Of course, as the typical notion of quantization necessitates the canonical commutation relations (CCR) to hold, which they do not in KvN, the concept needs to be properly revised. To justify such a revision the typical reasons for necessitation the CCR, reductionism and quantization as 'turning brackets to commutators', are examined and found insufficient.