Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0308096

The Heisenberg versus the Schrodinger picture in quantum field theory

Dan Solomon

Published Aug 18, 2003• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Heisenberg picture and Schrodinger picture are supposed to be equivalent representations of quantum mechanics. However this idea has been challenged by P.A.M. Dirac. Also, it has been recently shown by A. J. Faria et al that this is not necessarily the case. In this article a simple problem will be worked out in quantum field theory in which the Heisenberg picture and Schrodinger picture give different results.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0308096

Related papers

Alternative Formulations

Bernard d’Espagnat

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

On the (Non)Equivalence of the Schrodinger and Heisenberg Pictures of Quantum Mechanics

de Gosson, Anthony Maurice

The aim of this short Note is to show that the Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures of quantum mechanics cannot be equivalent unless one uses a quantization rule clearly stated by Born and Jordan in their famous 1925 paper. This rule is sufficient and necessary to ensure energy conservation in Heisenberg's matrix mechanics. It follows, in particular, that Schrodinger and Heisenberg mechanics yield different theories if one quantizes the Hamiltonian using the Weyl prescription.

•Apr 27, 2014•0 citations

Time evolution of quantum systems

Dževad Belkić

In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 15, 2020•0 citations

Complements

Bernard d’Espagnat

This chapter briefly explains the two elementary points concerning quantum mechanics: the mean value rule and the Heisenberg picture. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects the Heisenberg picture has definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. For describing pure cases the use of wave functions in place of kets is sometimes convenient. The mean value of an observable A and the probability that a measurement of A yields eigenvalue a k can be expressed by means of wave functions. The state vector of a system that does not undergo a measurement does not change with time, obviously this state vector is suddenly modified—also in the Heisenberg picture—when a measurement takes place.

CRC Press eBooks•May 4, 2018•0 citations

Quantum Electrodynamics without Dead Wood

P. A. M. Dirac

In quantum electrodynamics one can obtain a Hamiltonian which gives reasonable field equations in the Heisenberg picture, but which does not allow of solutions of the wave equation to represent physical states in the Schr\"odinger picture. The inference is that the Heisenberg picture is a good picture, the Schr\"odinger picture is a bad picture, and the two pictures are not equivalent. The usual proof of the equivalence of the two pictures fails because the state vector of the Schr\"odinger picture does not remain in Hilbert space. One can set up quantum electrodynamics entirely in the Heisenberg picture and thereby avoid the worst difficulties encountered in the Schr\"odinger picture. The theory takes a logical form and is not merely an assembly of working rules. It can be applied to the calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment and the Lamb shift, and is then similar to the usual calculations of these effects, with a good deal of dead wood cut away. There is a problem concerned with the general interpretation of quantum mechanics when one cannot use the Schr\"odinger picture and some postulates are proposed for dealing with it.

Physical Review•Aug 9, 1965•55 citations

Unitary equivalence of Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures survives in nonlinear quantum mechanics

Lajos Diósi

The equivalence of Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures is often thought to break down in nonlinear quantum mechanics due to the absence of a state-independent unitary propagator. We show that for Hamiltonians depending on the state through instantaneous expectation values, the equivalence is preserved. While the unitary intertwiner becomes initial-state dependent, it remains well-defined and ensures identical physical predictions in both pictures. We illustrate this with the analytically solvable examples of a nonlinear spin precession and a mean-field harmonic force, as well as in local field theory with mean-field coupling.

quant-pharXiv:2609.07391•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations
The Heisenberg picture and Schrodinger picture are supposed to be equivalent representations of quantum mechanics. However this idea has been challenged by P.A.M. Dirac. Also, it has been recently shown by A. J. Faria et al that this is not necessarily the case. In this article a simple problem will be worked out in quantum field theory in which the Heisenberg picture and Schrodinger picture give different results.
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.
This chapter briefly explains the two elementary points concerning quantum mechanics: the mean value rule and the Heisenberg picture. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures are two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects the Heisenberg picture has definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. For describing pure cases the use of wave functions in place of kets is sometimes convenient. The mean value of an observable A and the probability that a measurement of A yields eigenvalue a k can be expressed by means of wave functions. The state vector of a system that does not undergo a measurement does not change with time, obviously this state vector is suddenly modified—also in the Heisenberg picture—when a measurement takes place.
In quantum electrodynamics one can obtain a Hamiltonian which gives reasonable field equations in the Heisenberg picture, but which does not allow of solutions of the wave equation to represent physical states in the Schr\"odinger picture. The inference is that the Heisenberg picture is a good picture, the Schr\"odinger picture is a bad picture, and the two pictures are not equivalent. The usual proof of the equivalence of the two pictures fails because the state vector of the Schr\"odinger picture does not remain in Hilbert space. One can set up quantum electrodynamics entirely in the Heisenberg picture and thereby avoid the worst difficulties encountered in the Schr\"odinger picture. The theory takes a logical form and is not merely an assembly of working rules. It can be applied to the calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment and the Lamb shift, and is then similar to the usual calculations of these effects, with a good deal of dead wood cut away. There is a problem concerned with the general interpretation of quantum mechanics when one cannot use the Schr\"odinger picture and some postulates are proposed for dealing with it.
The equivalence of Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures is often thought to break down in nonlinear quantum mechanics due to the absence of a state-independent unitary propagator. We show that for Hamiltonians depending on the state through instantaneous expectation values, the equivalence is preserved. While the unitary intertwiner becomes initial-state dependent, it remains well-defined and ensures identical physical predictions in both pictures. We illustrate this with the analytically solvable examples of a nonlinear spin precession and a mean-field harmonic force, as well as in local field theory with mean-field coupling.