Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0308006 · Physical Review A

Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates

Farrokh Vatan, Colin P. Williams

Published Mar 22, 2004• 442 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In order to demonstrate nontrivial quantum computations experimentally, such as the synthesis of arbitrary entangled states, it will be useful to understand how to decompose a desired quantum computation into the shortest possible sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit gates. We contribute to this effort by providing a method to construct an optimal quantum circuit for a general two-qubit gate that requires at most 3 controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates and 15 elementary one-qubit gates. Moreover, if the desired two-qubit gate corresponds to a purely real unitary transformation, we provide a construction that requries at most 2 CNOT and 12 one-qubit gates. We then prove that these constructions are optimal with respect to the family of CNOT, $y$-rotation, $z$-rotation, and phase gates.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.69.032315

Related papers

Optimal design of two-qubit quantum circuits

Farrokh Vatan, Colin P. Williams

In order to demonstrate non-trivial quantum computations experimentally, such as the synthesis of arbitrary entangled states, it will be useful to nderstand how to decompose a desired quantum computation into the shortest possible sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit gates. We contribute to this effort by providing a method to construct an optimal quantum circuit for a general two-qubit gate that requires at most 3 CNOT gates and 15 elementary one qubit gates. We then prove that these constructions are optimal with respect to the family of CNOT, y-rotation, z-rotation, and phase gates.

•Jan 5, 2004•0 citations

Arbitrary two-qubit computation in 23 elementary gates

Stephen S. Bullock, Igor L. Markov

We address the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary two-qubit quantum computation. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and as small a number of elementary quantum gates as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least $17$ gates: $15$ one-qubit rotations and $2$ controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates. We also constructively prove a worst-case upper bound of $23$ elementary gates, of which at most four (CNOT gates) entail multiqubit interactions. Our analysis shows that synthesis algorithms suggested in previous work, although more general, entail larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm has a worst case of $61$ gates, of which $18$ may be CNOT gates.

arXiv:quant-ph/0211002•Physical Review A•Jul 22, 2003•59 citations

An arbitrary twoqubit computation In 23 elementary gates or less

Stephen S. Bullock, Igor L. Markov

Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation [14]. Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and as small a number of elementary quantum gates [1, 9] as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 17 gates: 15 one-qubit rotations and 2 CNOTs. To this end, we constructively prove a worstcase upper bound of 23 elementary gates, of which at most 4 (CNOTs) entail multi-qubit interactions. Our analysis shows that previously known synthesis algorithms, although more general, entail much larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm [4] has a worst case of 61 gates of which 18 may be CNOTs. Our techniques rely on the KAK decomposition from Lie theory as well as the polar and spectral (symmetric Shur) matrix decompositions from numerical analysis. They are related to the canonical decomposition of a two-qubit gate with respect to the "magic basis" of phase-shifted Bell states [11, 12]. We extend this decomposition in terms of elementary gates for quantum computation.

ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)•Jan 1, 2003•4 citations

An arbitrary twoqubit computation In 23 elementary gates or less

Stephen S. Bullock, Igor L. Markov

Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation [14]. Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and as small a number of elementary quantum gates [1, 9] as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 17 gates: 15 one-qubit rotations and 2 CNOTs. To this end, we constructively prove a worstcase upper bound of 23 elementary gates, of which at most 4 (CNOTs) entail multi-qubit interactions. Our analysis shows that previously known synthesis algorithms, although more general, entail much larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm [4] has a worst case of 61 gates of which 18 may be CNOTs. Our techniques rely on the KAK decomposition from Lie theory as well as the polar and spectral (symmetric Shur) matrix decompositions from numerical analysis. They are related to the canonical decomposition of a two-qubit gate with respect to the "magic basis" of phase-shifted Bell states [11, 12]. We extend this decomposition in terms of elementary gates for quantum computation.

ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)•Jun 2, 2003•17 citations

An arbitrary two-qubit computation in 23 elementary gates or less

Stephen S. Bullock, Igor L. Markov

Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation according to M. Nielsen and I. Chuang (2000). Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and a small number of elementary quantum gates by A. Barenco et al. (1995) and G. Song and A. Klappenecker (2003) as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 17 gates: 15 one-qubit rotations and 2 CNOTs. To this end, we constructively prove a worst-case upper bound to 23 elementary gates, of which at most 4 (CNOTs) entail multi-qubit interactions. Our analysis shows that previous known synthesis algorithms, although more general, entail much larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm according to G. Cybenko (2001) has a worst case of 61 gates of which 18 may be CNOTs. Our technique rely on the KAK decomposition from Lie theory as well as the polar and spectral (symmetric Shur) matrix decompositions from numerical analysis. They are related to the canonical decomposition of two-qubit gate with respect to the "magic basis" of phase-shifted Bell states by N. Khaneja et al. (2001) and M. Lewenstein et al. (2001). We extend this decomposition in terms of elementary gates for quantum computation.

ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)•Mar 1, 2004•5 citations

Finding small two-qubit circuits

Vivek Shende, Igor L. Markov, Stephen S. Bullock

An important result from the mid nineties shows that any unitary evolution may be realized as a sequence of controlled-not and one-qubit gates. This work surveys especially efficient circuits in this library, in the special case of evolutions on two-quantum bits. In particular, we show that to construct an arbitrary two-qubit state from |00>, one CNOT gate suffices. To simulate an arbitrary two-qubit operator up to relative phases, two CNOTs suffice. To simulate an arbitrary two-qubit operator up to global phase, three CNOTs suffice. In each case, we construct an explicit circuit and prove optimality in the generic case. We also contribute a procedure to determine the minimal number of CNOT gates necessary to simulate a given two-qubit operator up to global phase. We use this procedure to discuss timing a given Hamiltonian to simulate the CNOT and to determine an optimal circuit for the two-qubit Quantum Fourier Transform. Our constructive proofs amount to circuit synthesis algorithms and have been coded in C++.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 24, 2004•13 citations
In order to demonstrate nontrivial quantum computations experimentally, such as the synthesis of arbitrary entangled states, it will be useful to understand how to decompose a desired quantum computation into the shortest possible sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit gates. We contribute to this effort by providing a method to construct an optimal quantum circuit for a general two-qubit gate that requires at most 3 controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates and 15 elementary one-qubit gates. Moreover, if the desired two-qubit gate corresponds to a purely real unitary transformation, we provide a construction that requries at most 2 CNOT and 12 one-qubit gates. We then prove that these constructions are optimal with respect to the family of CNOT, yyy-rotation, zzz-rotation, and phase gates.
In order to demonstrate non-trivial quantum computations experimentally, such as the synthesis of arbitrary entangled states, it will be useful to nderstand how to decompose a desired quantum computation into the shortest possible sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit gates. We contribute to this effort by providing a method to construct an optimal quantum circuit for a general two-qubit gate that requires at most 3 CNOT gates and 15 elementary one qubit gates. We then prove that these constructions are optimal with respect to the family of CNOT, y-rotation, z-rotation, and phase gates.
We address the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary two-qubit quantum computation. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and as small a number of elementary quantum gates as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 171717 gates: 151515 one-qubit rotations and 222 controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates. We also constructively prove a worst-case upper bound of 232323 elementary gates, of which at most four (CNOT gates) entail multiqubit interactions. Our analysis shows that synthesis algorithms suggested in previous work, although more general, entail larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm has a worst case of 616161 gates, of which 181818 may be CNOT gates.
Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation [14]. Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and as small a number of elementary quantum gates [1, 9] as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 17 gates: 15 one-qubit rotations and 2 CNOTs. To this end, we constructively prove a worstcase upper bound of 23 elementary gates, of which at most 4 (CNOTs) entail multi-qubit interactions. Our analysis shows that previously known synthesis algorithms, although more general, entail much larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm [4] has a worst case of 61 gates of which 18 may be CNOTs. Our techniques rely on the KAK decomposition from Lie theory as well as the polar and spectral (symmetric Shur) matrix decompositions from numerical analysis. They are related to the canonical decomposition of a two-qubit gate with respect to the "magic basis" of phase-shifted Bell states [11, 12]. We extend this decomposition in terms of elementary gates for quantum computation.
Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation [14]. Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and as small a number of elementary quantum gates [1, 9] as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 17 gates: 15 one-qubit rotations and 2 CNOTs. To this end, we constructively prove a worstcase upper bound of 23 elementary gates, of which at most 4 (CNOTs) entail multi-qubit interactions. Our analysis shows that previously known synthesis algorithms, although more general, entail much larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm [4] has a worst case of 61 gates of which 18 may be CNOTs. Our techniques rely on the KAK decomposition from Lie theory as well as the polar and spectral (symmetric Shur) matrix decompositions from numerical analysis. They are related to the canonical decomposition of a two-qubit gate with respect to the "magic basis" of phase-shifted Bell states [11, 12]. We extend this decomposition in terms of elementary gates for quantum computation.
Quantum circuits currently constitute a dominant model for quantum computation according to M. Nielsen and I. Chuang (2000). Our work addresses the problem of constructing quantum circuits to implement an arbitrary given quantum computation, in the special case of two qubits. We pursue circuits without ancilla qubits and a small number of elementary quantum gates by A. Barenco et al. (1995) and G. Song and A. Klappenecker (2003) as possible. Our lower bound for worst-case optimal two-qubit circuits calls for at least 17 gates: 15 one-qubit rotations and 2 CNOTs. To this end, we constructively prove a worst-case upper bound to 23 elementary gates, of which at most 4 (CNOTs) entail multi-qubit interactions. Our analysis shows that previous known synthesis algorithms, although more general, entail much larger quantum circuits than ours in the special case of two qubits. One such algorithm according to G. Cybenko (2001) has a worst case of 61 gates of which 18 may be CNOTs. Our technique rely on the KAK decomposition from Lie theory as well as the polar and spectral (symmetric Shur) matrix decompositions from numerical analysis. They are related to the canonical decomposition of two-qubit gate with respect to the "magic basis" of phase-shifted Bell states by N. Khaneja et al. (2001) and M. Lewenstein et al. (2001). We extend this decomposition in terms of elementary gates for quantum computation.
An important result from the mid nineties shows that any unitary evolution may be realized as a sequence of controlled-not and one-qubit gates. This work surveys especially efficient circuits in this library, in the special case of evolutions on two-quantum bits. In particular, we show that to construct an arbitrary two-qubit state from |00>, one CNOT gate suffices. To simulate an arbitrary two-qubit operator up to relative phases, two CNOTs suffice. To simulate an arbitrary two-qubit operator up to global phase, three CNOTs suffice. In each case, we construct an explicit circuit and prove optimality in the generic case. We also contribute a procedure to determine the minimal number of CNOT gates necessary to simulate a given two-qubit operator up to global phase. We use this procedure to discuss timing a given Hamiltonian to simulate the CNOT and to determine an optimal circuit for the two-qubit Quantum Fourier Transform. Our constructive proofs amount to circuit synthesis algorithms and have been coded in C++.