We introduce a "statistical query sampling" model, in which the goal of an algorithm is to produce an element in a hidden set S/spl sube/{0,1}/sup n/ with reasonable probability. The algorithm gains information about S through oracle calls (statistical queries), where the algorithm submits a query function g(/spl middot/) and receives an approximation to Pr/sub x/spl isin/S/[g(x)=1]. We show how this model is related to NMR quantum computing, in which only statistical properties of an ensemble of quantum systems can be measured, and in particular to the question of whether one can translate standard quantum algorithms to the NMR setting without putting all of their classical postprocessing into the quantum system. Using Fourier analysis techniques developed in the related context of statistical query learning, we prove a number of lower bounds (both information-theoretic and cryptographic) on the ability of algorithms to produce an x/spl isin/S, even when the set S is fairly simple. These lower bounds point out a difficulty in efficiently applying NMR quantum computing to algorithms such as Shor's and Simon's algorithm that involve significant classical postprocessing. We also explicitly relate the notion of statistical query sampling to that of statistical query learning.
We introduce a "statistical query sampling" model, in which the goal of an algorithm is to produce an element in a hidden set S/spl sube/{0,1}/sup n/ with reasonable probability. The algorithm gains information about S through oracle calls (statistical queries), where the algorithm submits a query function g(/spl middot/) and receives an approximation to Pr/sub x/spl isin/S/[g(x)=1]. We show how this model is related to NMR quantum computing, in which only statistical properties of an ensemble of quantum systems can be measured, and in particular to the question of whether one can translate standard quantum algorithms to the NMR setting without putting all of their classical postprocessing into the quantum system. Using Fourier analysis techniques developed in the related context of statistical query learning, we prove a number of lower bounds (both information-theoretic and cryptographic) on the ability of algorithms to produce an x/spl isin/S, even when the set S is fairly simple. These lower bounds point out a difficulty in efficiently applying NMR quantum computing to algorithms such as Shor's and Simon's algorithm that involve significant classical postprocessing. We also explicitly relate the notion of statistical query sampling to that of statistical query learning.
We propose a learning model called the quantum statistical learning QSQ model, which extends the SQ learning model introduced by Kearns to the quantum setting. Our model can be also seen as a restriction of the quantum PAC learning model: here, the learner does not have direct access to quantum examples, but can only obtain estimates of measurement statistics on them. Theoretically, this model provides a simple yet expressive setting to explore the power of quantum examples in machine learning. From a practical perspective, since simpler operations are required, learning algorithms in the QSQ model are more feasible for implementation on near-term quantum devices. We prove a number of results about the QSQ learning model. We first show that parity functions, (log n)-juntas and polynomial-sized DNF formulas are efficiently learnable in the QSQ model, in contrast to the classical setting where these problems are provably hard. This implies that many of the advantages of quantum PAC learning can be realized even in the more restricted quantum SQ learning model. It is well-known that weak statistical query dimension, denoted by WSQDIM(C), characterizes the complexity of learning a concept class C in the classical SQ model. We show that log(WSQDIM(C)) is a lower bound on the complexity of QSQ learning, and furthermore it is tight for certain concept classes C. Additionally, we show that this quantity provides strong lower bounds for the small-bias quantum communication model under product distributions. Finally, we introduce the notion of private quantum PAC learning, in which a quantum PAC learner is required to be differentially private. We show that learnability in the QSQ model implies learnability in the quantum private PAC model. Additionally, we show that in the private PAC learning setting, the classical and quantum sample complexities are equal, up to constant factors.
We propose several algorithms for learning unitary operators from quantum statistical queries with respect to their Choi-Jamiolkowski state. Quantum statistical queries capture the capabilities of a learner with limited quantum resources, which receives as input only noisy estimates of expected values of measurements. Our approach leverages quantum statistical queries to estimate the Fourier mass of a unitary on a subset of Pauli strings, generalizing previous techniques developed for uniform quantum examples. Specifically, we show that the celebrated quantum Goldreich-Levin algorithm can be implemented with quantum statistical queries, whereas the prior version of the algorithm involves oracle access to the unitary and its inverse. As an application, we prove that quantum Boolean functions with constant total influence or with constant degree are efficiently learnable in our model. Moreover, we prove that O(logn) -juntas are efficiently learnable and constant-depth circuits are learnable query-efficiently with quantum statistical queries. On the other hand, all previous algorithms for these tasks demand significantly greater resources, such as oracle access to the unitary or direct access to the Choi-Jamiolkowski state. We also demonstrate that, despite these positive results, quantum statistical queries lead to an exponentially larger query complexity for certain tasks, compared to separable measurements to the Choi-Jamiolkowski state. In particular, we show an exponential lower bound for learning a class of phase-oracle unitaries and a double exponential lower bound for testing the unitarity of channels. Taken together, our results indicate that quantum statistical queries offer a unified framework for various unitary learning tasks, with potential applications in quantum machine learning, many-body physics and benchmarking of near-term devices.
We combine the classical notions and techniques for bounded query classes with those developed in quantum computing. We give strong evidence that quantum queries to an oracle in the class NP does indeed reduce the query, complexity of decision problems. Under traditional complexity assumptions, we obtain an exponential speedup between the quantum and the classical query complexity of function classes. For decision problems and function classes we obtain the following results: P/sub /spl par///sup NP[2k]//spl sube/EQP/sub /spl par///sup NP[k]/; P/sub /spl par///sup NP[2k+1-2]//spl sube/EQP/sup NP[k]/; FP/sub /spl par///sup NP[2k=1-2]//spl sube/FEQP/sup NP[2k]/; FP/sub /spl par///sup NP/spl sube/FEQP(NP[Olog n)]/. For sets A that are many-one complete for PSPACE or EXP we show that Fp/sup A//spl sube/FEQP/sup A[1]/. Sets A that are many-one complete for PP have the property that FP/sub /spl par///sup A//spl sube/FEQP/sup A[1]/. In general we prove that for any set A there is a set X such that FP/sup A//spl sube/FEQP/sup X[1]/, establishing that no set is superterse in the quantum setting.
Query complexity is a model of computation in which we have to compute a function f(x1,…,xN) of variables xi which can be accessed via queries. The complexity of an algorithm is measured by the number of queries that it makes. Query complexity is widely used for studying quantum algorithms, for two reasons. First, it includes many of the known quantum algorithms (including Grover's quantum search and a key subroutine of Shor's factoring algorithm). Second, one can prove lower bounds on the query complexity, bounding the possible quantum advantage. In the last few years, there have been major advances on several longstanding problems in the query complexity. In this talk, we survey these results and related work, including: - the biggest quantum-vs-classical gap for partial functions (a problem solvable with 1 query quantumly but requiring Ω(N) queries classically); - the biggest quantum-vs-determistic and quantum-vs-probabilistic gaps for total functions (for example, a problem solvable with M queries quantumly but requiring Ω~(M2.5) queries probabilistically); - the biggest probabilistic-vs-deterministic gap for total functions (a problem solvable with M queries probabilistically but requiring Ω~(M2) queries deterministically); - the bounds on the gap that can be achieved for subclasses of functions (for example, symmetric functions); - the connections between query algorithms and approximations by low-degree polynomials.
Random circuit sampling experiments, the leading demonstrations of quantum computational advantage, are tested with the linear cross-entropy benchmark (XEB), which scores outcomes by their ideal probabilities. We study what a high XEB score certifies about an untrusted quantum device. In the quantum query model, we show that the honest sampler's ideal score acts as a Tsirelson bound for efficient devices and certified randomness. First, exceeding the ideal score by a constant requires Ω(N1/3) queries for the Haar and Fourier oracle ensembles with N outcomes, and this bound is tight; this proves an earlier conjecture for Haar-random states and extends it to Fourier sampling. Second, for Fourier sampling and for Haar-random states accessed through the canonical state-preparation oracle, the n-bit output of a device that makes polynomially many queries and scores within o(1) of the ideal score has n−O(logn) bits of smooth min-entropy, even against an adversary who is entangled with the device and later learns the oracle; this is nearly optimal. As a corollary, sampling the collision distribution, which is proportional to the square of the ideal distribution, has query complexity Θ(N1/3), and a coherent version of the same algorithm approximately prepares quantum Hadamard products of states with uniform amplitude magnitudes. Both lower bounds rest on progress measures that bound the excess over the ideal score and increase only slightly with each query. For Fourier sampling the measure is the norm of the coherent amplitudes for removing pairs in a purification of the random function, combining the polynomial method with the compressed oracle technique; for Haar-random states it is the square root of the average level in an expansion in Dirichlet orthogonal polynomials, controlled by an exact identity for the effect of one observation.
This thesis studies strengths and weaknesses of quantum computers. In the first part we present three contributions to quantum algorithms. 1) consider a search space of N elements. One of these elements is "marked" and our goal is to find this. We describe a quantum algorithm to solve this problem using essentially sqrt{N} queries and other operations, improving over the gate count of Grover's algorithm. 2) We give a succinct characterization of quantum algorithms in terms of polynomials, and develop a new technique for showing upper and lower bounds on quantum query complexity based on this. 3) One generic technique used to compute the minimum of a given function is "gradient descent". We present a quantum gradient-calculation algorithm and a gradient-optimization algorithm that is quadratically faster than classical algorithms. In the second part of this thesis we look at quantum learning theory. 1) We survey quantum learning theory, describing the main results known for three models of learning, using classical as well as quantum data: exact learning from membership queries, the probably approximately correct (PAC) learning model, and the agnostic learning model. 2) We then consider if a quantum learner can PAC-learn a given concept class from fewer quantum examples. We give a negative answer by showing that quantum examples are not more powerful than classical random examples, both for PAC learning and for agnostic learning.