Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0305163 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Bohmian arrival time without trajectories

Sabine Kreidl, Gebhard Grübl, Hans Georg Embacher

Published Aug 5, 2003• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The computation of detection probabilities and arrival time distributions within Bohmian mechanics in general needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories. Here it is shown how for one-dimensional systems and rigid inertial detectors these quantities can be computed without calculating any trajectories. An expression in terms of the wavefunction Ψ and its spatial derivative ∂ x Ψ, both restricted to the boundary of the detector's spacetime volume, is derived for the general case, where the probability current at the detector's boundary may vary its sign.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/36/33/309

Related papers

Bohmian dwell times without trajectories

Sabine Kreidl

Within the framework of Bohmian mechanics dwell times find a straightforward formulation. The computation of associated probabilities and distributions however needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories and therefore implies formidable numerical effort. Here a trajectory free formulation for average dwell times in quite arbitrary spacetime regions is given. Moreover explicit trajectory free formulas for the average transmission and reflection times within static spatial intervals [a,b] are given for one-dimensional scattering problems.

•Jun 8, 2004•0 citations

Arrival Times Versus Detection Times

Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghı̀

Abstract How to compute the probability distribution of a detection time, i.e., of the time which a detector registers as the arrival time of a quantum particle, is a long-debated problem. In this regard, Bohmian mechanics provides in a straightforward way the distribution of the time at which the particle actually does arrive at a given surface in 3-space in the absence of detectors. However, as we discuss here, since the presence of detectors can change the evolution of the wave function and thus the particle trajectories, it cannot be taken for granted that the arrival time of the Bohmian trajectories in the absence of detectors agrees with the one in the presence of detectors, and even less with the detection time. In particular, we explain why certain distributions that Das and Dürr (Sci. Rep. 9: 2242, 2019) presented as the distribution of the detection time in a case with spin, based on assuming that all three times mentioned coincide, are actually not what Bohmian mechanics predicts.

arXiv:2405.04607•Foundations of Physics•Sep 14, 2024•13 citations

Bohmian transmission and reflection dwell times without trajectory sampling

Sabine Kreidl

Within the framework of Bohmian mechanics dwell times find a straightforward formulation. The computation of associated probabilities and distributions however needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories and therefore implies formidable numerical effort. Here, a trajectory free formulation for the average transmission and reflection dwell times within static spatial intervals [ a , b ] is given for one-dimensional scattering problems. This formulation reduces the computation time to less than 5% of the computation time by means of trajectory sampling.

arXiv:quant-ph/0406045•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 25, 2005•2 citations

Time of arrival in quantum and Bohmian mechanics

C. Richard Leavens

In a recent paper Grot, Rovelli, and Tate (GRT) [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4676 (1996)] derived an expression for the probability distribution $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ of intrinsic arrival times $T(X)$ at position $x=X$ for a quantum particle with initial wave function $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t=0)$ freely evolving in one dimension. This was done by quantizing the classical expression for the time of arrival of a free particle at $X,$ assuming a particular choice of operator ordering, and then regulating the resulting time of arrival operator. For the special case of a minimum-uncertainty-product wave packet at $t=0$ with average wave number $〈k〉$ and variance $\ensuremath{\Delta}k$ they showed that their analytical expression for $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ agreed with the probability current density $J(x=X,t=T)$ only to terms of order $\ensuremath{\Delta}k/〈k〉.$ They dismissed the probability current density as a viable candidate for the exact arrival time distribution on the grounds that it can sometimes be negative. This fact is not a problem within Bohmian mechanics where the arrival time distribution for a particle, either free or in the presence of a potential, is rigorously given by $|J(X,T)|$ (suitably normalized) [W. R. McKinnon and C. R. Leavens, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2748 (1995); C. R. Leavens, Phys. Lett. A 178, 27 (1993); M. Daumer et al., in On Three Levels: The Mathematical Physics of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Approaches to Physics, edited by M. Fannes et al. (Plenum, New York, 1994); M. Daumer, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, edited by J. T. Cushing et al. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996)]. The two theories are compared in this paper and a case presented for which the results could not differ more: According to GRT's theory, every particle in the ensemble reaches a point $x=X,$ where $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t)$ and $J(x,t)$ are both zero for all $t,$ while no particle ever reaches $X$ according to the theory based on Bohmian mechanics. Some possible implications are discussed.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1998•93 citations

Time of arrival from Bohmian flow

Gebhard Grübl, Klaus Rheinberger

We develop a new conception for the quantum mechanical arrival time distribution from the perspective of Bohmian mechanics. A detection probability for detectors sensitive to quite arbitrary spacetime domains is formulated. Basic positivity and monotonicity properties are established. We show that our detection probability improves and generalizes an earlier proposal by Leavens and McKinnon. The difference between the two notions is illustrated through application to a free wavepacket.

arXiv:quant-ph/0202084•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 15, 2002•24 citations

What Bohmian mechanic says about arrival times of 1D vacuum squeezed states

Angel García-Chung, Humberto G. Laguna

Abstract We calculate the time of arrival probability distribution of a quantum particle using the Bohmian formalism. The pilot-wave is given by the wave function of the one dimensional vacuum squeezed state written in the Schrödinger representation. To obtain this pilot-wave, we used the unitary representation of the symplectic group in the Hilbert space L 2 ( R ) . The solution to the Bohmian equation is a closed expression in time thus allowing for a closed expression of the time of arrival distribution. We show the dependence of the time of arrival distribution as a function of the squeezing parameter, the ratio of the detector’s position and the proper length of the oscillator and the squeezing phase parameter.

arXiv:2502.05734•Journal of Physics Communications•Oct 1, 2025•1 citation
The computation of detection probabilities and arrival time distributions within Bohmian mechanics in general needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories. Here it is shown how for one-dimensional systems and rigid inertial detectors these quantities can be computed without calculating any trajectories. An expression in terms of the wavefunction Ψ and its spatial derivative ∂ x Ψ, both restricted to the boundary of the detector's spacetime volume, is derived for the general case, where the probability current at the detector's boundary may vary its sign.
Within the framework of Bohmian mechanics dwell times find a straightforward formulation. The computation of associated probabilities and distributions however needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories and therefore implies formidable numerical effort. Here a trajectory free formulation for average dwell times in quite arbitrary spacetime regions is given. Moreover explicit trajectory free formulas for the average transmission and reflection times within static spatial intervals [a,b] are given for one-dimensional scattering problems.
Abstract How to compute the probability distribution of a detection time, i.e., of the time which a detector registers as the arrival time of a quantum particle, is a long-debated problem. In this regard, Bohmian mechanics provides in a straightforward way the distribution of the time at which the particle actually does arrive at a given surface in 3-space in the absence of detectors. However, as we discuss here, since the presence of detectors can change the evolution of the wave function and thus the particle trajectories, it cannot be taken for granted that the arrival time of the Bohmian trajectories in the absence of detectors agrees with the one in the presence of detectors, and even less with the detection time. In particular, we explain why certain distributions that Das and Dürr (Sci. Rep. 9: 2242, 2019) presented as the distribution of the detection time in a case with spin, based on assuming that all three times mentioned coincide, are actually not what Bohmian mechanics predicts.
Within the framework of Bohmian mechanics dwell times find a straightforward formulation. The computation of associated probabilities and distributions however needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories and therefore implies formidable numerical effort. Here, a trajectory free formulation for the average transmission and reflection dwell times within static spatial intervals [ a , b ] is given for one-dimensional scattering problems. This formulation reduces the computation time to less than 5% of the computation time by means of trajectory sampling.
In a recent paper Grot, Rovelli, and Tate (GRT) [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4676 (1996)] derived an expression for the probability distribution $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ of intrinsic arrival times T(X)T(X)T(X) at position x=Xx=Xx=X for a quantum particle with initial wave function $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t=0)$ freely evolving in one dimension. This was done by quantizing the classical expression for the time of arrival of a free particle at X,X,X, assuming a particular choice of operator ordering, and then regulating the resulting time of arrival operator. For the special case of a minimum-uncertainty-product wave packet at t=0t=0t=0 with average wave number 〈k〉〈k〉〈k〉 and variance $\ensuremath{\Delta}k$ they showed that their analytical expression for $\ensuremath{\pi}(T;X)$ agreed with the probability current density J(x=X,t=T)J(x=X,t=T)J(x=X,t=T) only to terms of order $\ensuremath{\Delta}k/〈k〉.$ They dismissed the probability current density as a viable candidate for the exact arrival time distribution on the grounds that it can sometimes be negative. This fact is not a problem within Bohmian mechanics where the arrival time distribution for a particle, either free or in the presence of a potential, is rigorously given by ∣J(X,T)∣|J(X,T)|∣J(X,T)∣ (suitably normalized) [W. R. McKinnon and C. R. Leavens, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2748 (1995); C. R. Leavens, Phys. Lett. A 178, 27 (1993); M. Daumer et al., in On Three Levels: The Mathematical Physics of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Approaches to Physics, edited by M. Fannes et al. (Plenum, New York, 1994); M. Daumer, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, edited by J. T. Cushing et al. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996)]. The two theories are compared in this paper and a case presented for which the results could not differ more: According to GRT's theory, every particle in the ensemble reaches a point x=X,x=X,x=X, where $\ensuremath{\psi}(x,t)$ and J(x,t)J(x,t)J(x,t) are both zero for all t,t,t, while no particle ever reaches XXX according to the theory based on Bohmian mechanics. Some possible implications are discussed.
Abstract We calculate the time of arrival probability distribution of a quantum particle using the Bohmian formalism. The pilot-wave is given by the wave function of the one dimensional vacuum squeezed state written in the Schrödinger representation. To obtain this pilot-wave, we used the unitary representation of the symplectic group in the Hilbert space L 2 ( R ) . The solution to the Bohmian equation is a closed expression in time thus allowing for a closed expression of the time of arrival distribution. We show the dependence of the time of arrival distribution as a function of the squeezing parameter, the ratio of the detector’s position and the proper length of the oscillator and the squeezing phase parameter.