arXiv:quant-ph/0304079

Comments On "Three Paradox of Quantum Information"

Wang Honghy

Published Apr 11, 2003• 0 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0304079

Related papers

Comment on 'Quantum Information Paradox Real or Fictitious'

Chandra Prakash

Jan 1, 20200 citations

Comment on “Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements”

Anonymous

Physical Review AMay 13, 20250 citations

Comment on "Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements"

Xabier Oianguren-Asua

Jan 1, 20250 citations

Comment on “Wigner rotations and an apparent paradox in relativistic quantum information”

Marco O. Lanzagorta, Tanner Crowder

We show that the paradox published by Saldanha and Vedral [Phys. Rev. A 87, 042102 (2013)] is based on an improper interpretation of the localization probability density and a miscalculation of the wave functions. This Comment shows that there is no paradox as stated.

Physical Review AAug 10, 20176 citations

What is paradoxical about the "Three-box paradox"?

J. Finkelstein

This paper is a comment on quant-ph/0606067 by Ravon and Vaidman, in which they defend the position that the ``three-box paradox'' is indeed paradoxical.

arXiv:quant-ph/0606218Jun 26, 20064 citations

Some Issues in Quantum Information Theory

Runyao Duan, Zhengfeng Ji, Yuan Feng +1 more

Journal of Computer Science and TechnologySep 1, 20067 citations