Harry Buhrman et al gave an Omega(sqrt n) lower bound for monotone graph properties in the adjacency matrix query model. Their proof is based on the polynomial method. However for some properties stronger lower bounds exist. We give an Omega(n^{3/2}) bound for Graph Connectivity using Andris Ambainis' method, and an O(n^{3/2} log n) upper bound based on Grover's search algorithm. In addition we study the adjacency list query model, where we have almost matching lower and upper bounds for Strong Connectivity of directed graphs.
Harry Buhrman et al gave an Omega(sqrt n) lower bound for monotone graph properties in the adjacency matrix query model. Their proof is based on the polynomial method. However for some properties stronger lower bounds exist. We give an Omega(n^{3/2}) bound for Graph Connectivity using Andris Ambainis' method, and an O(n^{3/2} log n) upper bound based on Grover's search algorithm. In addition we study the adjacency list query model, where we have almost matching lower and upper bounds for Strong Connectivity of directed graphs.
Quantum algorithms for graph problems are considered, both in the adjacency matrix model and in an adjacency list-like array model. We give almost tight lower and upper bounds for the bounded error quantum query complexity of Connectivity, Strong Connectivity, Minimum Spanning Tree, and Single Source Shortest Paths. For example, we show that the query complexity of Minimum Spanning Tree is in Θ(n3/2) in the matrix model and in Θ(nm) in the array model, while the complexity of Connectivity is also in Θ(n3/2) in the matrix model but in Θ(n) in the array model. The upper bounds utilize search procedures for finding minima of functions under various conditions.
We prove the first non-trivial upper bound for the quantum query complexity of Boolean Matrix Product Verification (BMPV), answering a longstanding open question in quantum query complexity. For n×n matrices, our upper bound is O(n17/12), improving on the standard O(n3/2) bound obtained using Grover search by Buhrman and Špalek [SODA 2006]. We complement this result by showing an Ω(n5/4) lower bound, which improves over the previous best known lower bound of Ω(n19/18) by Childs, Kimmel, and Kothari [ESA 2012]. Our approach centers on a connection with Orthogonal Vectors (OV), which asks whether an indexed list of n Boolean vectors of dimension n contains two vectors with disjoint supports. In particular, we prove equivalences between OV and BMPV and establish the above bounds for OV. We also prove a tight Θ(n3/2) bound for a variant of BMPV that asks whether the product contains a given row vector. Together, these results imply a polynomial separation between the quantum query complexities of deciding whether a graph has radius at most two and whether it has diameter at most two.
In this work, we study bipartiteness and expansion testing, two canonical problems in graph property testing in the bounded-degree model through the lens of quantum query complexity. In the classical setting, it is known that Θ(N) queries are necessary and sufficient for both these testing problems (Goldreich and Ron, 1999, 2000 & 2002), where N denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. Due to their significance, (Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, 2011) initiated the study of these problems in the quantum setting and designed quantum algorithms for bipartiteness and expansion testing that perform O(N1/3) queries, showing a polynomial speedup. They also proved that Ω(N1/4) queries are necessary for expansion testing, but the possibility of an exponential quantum advantage for bipartiteness testing remained open. Despite significant effort, there has been no improvement in these results in the last decade and a half. In this work, we prove essentially tight Ω(N1/3) quantum query lower bounds for both bipartiteness and expansion testing, thereby completely characterizing the quantum query complexity of these problems up to polylogarithmic factors. While our proofs use the polynomial method similarly to Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, we use intermediate problems that we relate to the main problems via reductions, and perform a more precise analysis of the resulting polynomials, leading to the near-optimal lower bounds.
The edge connectivity of a simple graph is the least number of edges whose removal disconnects the graph. We study the quantum query complexity of computing the edge connectivity of a simple graph with n vertices and m edges in both the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models. For classical randomized algorithms, Ω(n2) and Ω(m) lower bounds are known for these models, respectively, showing that the trivial algorithm is optimal in terms of query complexity for both cases. In contrast, we show upper bounds of O~(n3/2) and O~(mn) on the quantum query complexity of computing edge connectivity in the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models, respectively. Our upper bound is tight up to logarithmic factors for the adjacency matrix model, while for the adjacency array model the best quantum query lower bound we know is Ω(n). Our upper bounds follow by combining a lemma on the structure of near-minimum cuts due to Rubinstein, Schramm and Weinberg (ITCS 2018) with a quantum sparsification algorithm by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS 2020).
For a weighted graph, instead of edge connectivity the relevant notion is the weight of a minimum cut, i.e. the minimum total weight of a set of edges whose removal disconnects the graph. For weighted graphs we show that in the worst case Ω(n2) queries can be needed to compute the weight of a minimum cut by a quantum algorithm in both the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models, thus no quantum speedup is possible in this case.
We study the quantum query complexity of several basic graph problems. 1) We prove a tight Θ(n3/2) bound for finding a maximum-out-degree vertex in an n-vertex tournament, resolving a conjecture of Mande, Paraashar, and Saurabh [FSTTCS'23]. 2) Using the same proof idea, we give a direct proof that finding a maximum-degree vertex in an n-vertex undirected graph requires Θ(n3/2) quantum queries, a bound implicit in the work of Apers and Lee [CCC'21]. Both lower bounds above hold even for computing only the maximum degree or maximum out-degree. 3) We also study Maximum (k,n−k)-Cut, which asks for the largest cut with one side of size k. For every constant k≥1, we give an O(n2−1/(k+1))-query quantum algorithm. 4) We establish a reduction to Maximum (k,n−k)-Cut involving k-Graph Collision, which asks whether the marked vertices of a known graph contain a k-clique. For k≥3, this yields unconditional lower bounds with exponents strictly larger than 3/2, showing that this problem is strictly harder than computing maximum degree. Additionally, under a conjecture we propose for k-Graph Collision, the reduction yields a lower bound matching our upper bound above.
The minimum cut problem in an undirected and weighted graph G is to find the minimum total weight of a set of edges whose removal disconnects G. We completely characterize the quantum query and time complexity of the minimum cut problem in the adjacency matrix model. If G has n vertices and edge weights at least 1 and at most τ, we give a quantum algorithm to solve the minimum cut problem using Õ(n^{3/2}√{τ}) queries and time. Moreover, for every integer 1 ≤ τ ≤ n we give an example of a graph G with edge weights 1 and τ such that solving the minimum cut problem on G requires Ω(n^{3/2}√{τ}) queries to the adjacency matrix of G. These results contrast with the classical randomized case where Ω(n²) queries to the adjacency matrix are needed in the worst case even to decide if an unweighted graph is connected or not. In the adjacency array model, when G has m edges the classical randomized complexity of the minimum cut problem is ̃ Θ(m). We show that the quantum query and time complexity are Õ(√{mnτ}) and Õ(√{mnτ} + n^{3/2}), respectively, where again the edge weights are between 1 and τ. For dense graphs we give lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of Ω(n^{3/2}) for τ > 1 and Ω(τ n) for any 1 ≤ τ ≤ n. Our query algorithm uses a quantum algorithm for graph sparsification by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS 2020) and results on the structure of near-minimum cuts by Kawarabayashi and Thorup (STOC 2015) and Rubinstein, Schramm and Weinberg (ITCS 2018). Our time efficient implementation builds on Karger’s tree packing technique (STOC 1996).