Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0303155 · Physical Review Letters

Berry Phase for a Spin 1/2 Particle in a Classical Fluctuating Field

Gabriele De Chiara, G. Massimo Palma

Published Aug 28, 2003• 229 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The effect of fluctuations in the classical control parameters on the Berry phase of a spin 1/2 interacting with an adiabatically cyclically varying magnetic field is analyzed. It is explicitly shown that in the adiabatic limit dephasing is due to fluctuations of the dynamical phase.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.91.090404

Related papers

Non-adiabatic Non-cyclic Generalization of the Berry Phase for a Spin-1/2 Particle in a Rotating Magnetic Field

Siamak Sadat Gousheh, Azadeh Mohammadi, Leila Shahkarami

In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo $2π$, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1212.2104•Dec 10, 2012•1 citation

Experimental Demonstration of the Stability of Berry’s Phase for a Spin- 1/2 Particle

Stefan Filipp, Jürgen Klepp, Yuji Hasegawa +4 more

The geometric phase has been proposed as a candidate for noise resilient coherent manipulation of fragile quantum systems. Since it is determined only by the path of the quantum state, the presence of noise fluctuations affects the geometric phase in a different way than the dynamical phase. We have experimentally tested the robustness of Berry's geometric phase for spin-1/2 particles in a cyclically varying magnetic field. Using trapped polarized ultracold neutrons, it is demonstrated that the geometric phase contributions to dephasing due to adiabatic field fluctuations vanish for long evolution times.

arXiv:0812.3757•Physical Review Letters•Jan 22, 2009•137 citations

Exploring the effect of noise on the Berry phase

S. Berger, Marek Pechal, A. A. Abdumalikov +5 more

We experimentally investigate the effects of noise on the adiabatic and cyclic geometric phase, also termed the Berry phase. By introducing artificial fluctuations in the path of the control field, we measure the geometric contribution to dephasing of an effective two-level system for a variety of noise powers and different paths. Our results, measured using a microwave-driven superconducting qubit, clearly show that only fluctuations which distort the path lead to geometric dephasing. In a direct comparison with the dynamic phase, which is path independent, we observe that the Berry phase is less affected by noise-induced dephasing. This observation directly points towards the potential of geometric phases for quantum gates or metrological applications.

arXiv:1302.3305•Physical Review A•Jun 26, 2013•101 citations

Exact phases and probabilities for a spin-1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field

Donald H. Kobe, Valdir C. Aguilera-Navarro, Samuel Maier Kurcbart +1 more

The probability amplitude for a spin-1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field to be in an energy eigenstate is calculated exactly. The probability for the particle to be in a given energy eigenstate and the corresponding phase of the amplitude are obtained. In the adiabatic limit there are no transitions, and the phase is the sum of the dynamical phase and the Berry phase. When a unitary transformation is made, the Hamiltonian and the energy operator transform differently. The energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes calculated in a frame rotating with the magnetic field are the same as in the laboratory frame. If the energy operator is incorrectly taken to be the Hamiltonian in the rotating frame, incorrect energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes are obtained. Nevertheless, in the adiabatic limit the correct total phase results.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1990•14 citations

Berry phase in the presence of external noise

Robert S. Whitney

Here we summarise and place in context two of our earlier works. There we investigate the geometric phase or Berry phase (BP) acquired by a spin‐half which is subject to external noise in addition to a slowly varying magnetic field (which generates the Berry phase). The noise may be due to the fluctuations of either quantum or classical degrees‐of‐freedom in the vicinity of the spin. We find that the noise modifies the Berry phase and that this modification is of a geometric nature. While the original BP (for an isolated system) is the flux of a monopole‐field through the loop traversed by the magnetic field, the noise‐induced modification of the BP is the flux of a quadrupole‐like field. The noise‐induced phase is complex and its imaginary part giving a geometric contribution to dephasing; its sign depends on the direction of the loop. Unlike the BP, this geometric dephasing is gauge invariant for open paths of the magnetic field. We discuss the consequences of this for proposals to use Berry phases to control qubits, in particular solid state (superconducting) qubits.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Berry phase of coupled two arbitrary spins in a time-varying magnetic field

许长谭, 贺明明, Chen Gang

In this paper, we investigate the Berry phase of two coupled arbitrary spins driven by a time-varying magnetic field where the Hamiltonian is explicitly time-dependent. Using a technique of time-dependent gauge transform the Berry phase and time-evolution operator are found explicitly in the adiabatic approximation. The general solutions for arbitrary spins are applied to the spin-1/2 system as an example of explanation.

Chinese Physics•May 1, 2006•4 citations
In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo 2π2π2π, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.
The geometric phase has been proposed as a candidate for noise resilient coherent manipulation of fragile quantum systems. Since it is determined only by the path of the quantum state, the presence of noise fluctuations affects the geometric phase in a different way than the dynamical phase. We have experimentally tested the robustness of Berry's geometric phase for spin-1/2 particles in a cyclically varying magnetic field. Using trapped polarized ultracold neutrons, it is demonstrated that the geometric phase contributions to dephasing due to adiabatic field fluctuations vanish for long evolution times.
We experimentally investigate the effects of noise on the adiabatic and cyclic geometric phase, also termed the Berry phase. By introducing artificial fluctuations in the path of the control field, we measure the geometric contribution to dephasing of an effective two-level system for a variety of noise powers and different paths. Our results, measured using a microwave-driven superconducting qubit, clearly show that only fluctuations which distort the path lead to geometric dephasing. In a direct comparison with the dynamic phase, which is path independent, we observe that the Berry phase is less affected by noise-induced dephasing. This observation directly points towards the potential of geometric phases for quantum gates or metrological applications.
The probability amplitude for a spin-1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field to be in an energy eigenstate is calculated exactly. The probability for the particle to be in a given energy eigenstate and the corresponding phase of the amplitude are obtained. In the adiabatic limit there are no transitions, and the phase is the sum of the dynamical phase and the Berry phase. When a unitary transformation is made, the Hamiltonian and the energy operator transform differently. The energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes calculated in a frame rotating with the magnetic field are the same as in the laboratory frame. If the energy operator is incorrectly taken to be the Hamiltonian in the rotating frame, incorrect energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes are obtained. Nevertheless, in the adiabatic limit the correct total phase results.
Here we summarise and place in context two of our earlier works. There we investigate the geometric phase or Berry phase (BP) acquired by a spin‐half which is subject to external noise in addition to a slowly varying magnetic field (which generates the Berry phase). The noise may be due to the fluctuations of either quantum or classical degrees‐of‐freedom in the vicinity of the spin. We find that the noise modifies the Berry phase and that this modification is of a geometric nature. While the original BP (for an isolated system) is the flux of a monopole‐field through the loop traversed by the magnetic field, the noise‐induced modification of the BP is the flux of a quadrupole‐like field. The noise‐induced phase is complex and its imaginary part giving a geometric contribution to dephasing; its sign depends on the direction of the loop. Unlike the BP, this geometric dephasing is gauge invariant for open paths of the magnetic field. We discuss the consequences of this for proposals to use Berry phases to control qubits, in particular solid state (superconducting) qubits.