Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0303071 · Physical Review A

Unambiguous discrimination of mixed states

Terry Rudolph, Robert W. Spekkens, Peter S. Turner

Published Jul 17, 2003• 143 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present the conditions under which probabilistic error-free discrimination of mixed states is possible, and provide upper and lower bounds on the maximum probability of success for the case of two mixed states. We solve certain special cases exactly, and demonstrate how the problems of state filtering and state comparison can be recast as problems of mixed state unambiguous discrimination.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.68.010301

Related papers

Optimum measurement for unambiguously discriminating two mixed states: General considerations and special cases

Herzog, U, Bergou, J A

Based on our previous publication [U. Herzog and J. A. Bergou, Phys.Rev. A 71, 050301(R) (2005)] we investigate the optimum measurement for the unambiguous discrimination of two mixed quantum states that occur with given prior probabilities. Unambiguous discrimination of nonorthogonal states is possible in a probabilistic way, at the expense of a nonzero probability of inconclusive results, where the measurement fails. Along with a discussion of the general problem, we give an example illustrating our method of solution. We also provide general inequalities for the minimum achievable failure probability and discuss in more detail the necessary conditions that must be fulfilled when its absolute lower bound, proportional to the fidelity of the states, can be reached.

•Oct 21, 2005•2 citations

Optimum measurement for unambiguously discriminating two mixed states: General considerations and special cases

Ulrike Herzog, János A Bergou

Based on our previous publication [U. Herzog and J. A. Bergou, Phys. Rev. A 71 , 050301(R)(2005)] we investigate the optimum measurement for the unambiguous discrimination of two mixed quantum states that occur with given prior probabilities. Unambiguous discrimination of nonorthogonal states is possible in a probabilistic way, at the expense of a nonzero probability of inconclusive results, where the measurement fails. Along with a discussion of the general problem, we give an example illustrating our method of solution. We also provide general inequalities for the minimum achievable failure probability and discuss in more detail the necessary conditions that must be fulfilled when its absolute lower bound, proportional to the fidelity of the states, can be reached.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510170•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Apr 1, 2006•2 citations

Optimal unambiguous state discrimination of two density matrices: Lower bound and class of exact solutions

Philippe Raynal, Norbert Lütkenhaus

Recently the problem of unambiguous state discrimination of mixed quantum states has attracted much attention. So far, bounds on the optimum success probability have been derived [T. Rudolph, R. W. Spekkens, and P. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. A 68, 010301(R) (2003)]. For two mixed states they are given in terms of the fidelity. Here we give tighter bounds as well as necessary and sufficient conditions for two mixed states to reach these bounds. Moreover we construct the corresponding optimal measurement strategies. With this result, we provide analytical solutions for unambiguous discrimination of a class of generic mixed states. This goes beyond known results which are all reducible to some pure state case. Additionally, we show that examples exist where the bounds cannot be reached.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502165•Physical Review A•Aug 29, 2005•44 citations

Optimal unambiguous filtering of a quantum state: An instance in mixed state discrimination

János A. Bergou, Ulrike Herzog, Mark S. Hillery

Deterministic discrimination of nonorthogonal states is forbidden by quantum measurement theory. However, if we do not want to succeed all the time, i.e., allow for inconclusive outcomes to occur, then unambiguous discrimination becomes possible with a certain probability of success. A variant of the problem is set discrimination: the states are grouped in sets and we want to determine to which particular set a given pure input state belongs. We consider here the simplest case, termed quantum state filtering, when the $N$ given nonorthogonal states ${\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{1}⟩,\dots{},\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{N}⟩}$ are divided into two sets and the first set consists of one state only while the second consists of all of the remaining states. We present the derivation of the optimal measurement strategy, in terms of a generalized measurement (positive-operator-valued measure), to distinguish $\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{1}⟩$ from the set ${\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{2}⟩,\dots{},\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{N}⟩}$ and the corresponding optimal success and failure probabilities. The results, but not the complete derivation, were presented previously [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 25901 (2003)] as the emphasis there was on appplication of the results to probabilistic quantum algorithms. We also show that the problem is equivalent to the discrimination of a pure state and an arbitrary mixed state.

arXiv:quant-ph/0504138•Physical Review A•Apr 11, 2005•29 citations

Unambiguous discrimination of mixed states: A description based on system-ancilla coupling

Xiang-Fa Zhou, Yong-Sheng Zhang, Guang‐Can Guo

We propose a general description for the unambiguous discrimination of mixed states according to the system-environment coupling, and present a procedure to reduce this to a standard semidefinite programming problem. In the two-state case, we introduce the canonical vectors and partly simplify the problem to the case of discrimination between pairs of canonical vectors. By considering the positivity of the $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ matrices, we obtain a series of new upper bounds for the total success probability, which depends on both the prior probabilities and specific state structures.

arXiv:quant-ph/0611095•Physical Review A•May 10, 2007•17 citations

Bounds on the minimum-error discrimination between mixed quantum states

Daowen Qiu, Lvjun Li

The minimum-error probability of ambiguous discrimination for two quantum states is the well-known {\it Helstrom limit} presented in 1976. Since then, it has been thought of as an intractable problem to obtain the minimum-error probability for ambiguously discriminating arbitrary $m$ quantum states. In this paper, we obtain a new lower bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination and compare this bound with six other bounds in the literature. Moreover, we show that the bound between ambiguous and unambiguous discrimination does not extend to ensembles of more than two states. Specifically, the main technical contributions are described as follows: (1) We derive a new lower bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination among arbitrary $m$ mixed quantum states with given prior probabilities, and we present a necessary and sufficient condition to show that this lower bound is attainable. (2) We compare this new lower bound with six other bounds in the literature in detail, and, in some cases, this bound is optimal. (3) It is known that if $m=2$, the optimal inconclusive probability of unambiguous discrimination $Q_{U}$ and the minimum-error probability of ambiguous discrimination $Q_{E}$ between arbitrary given $m$ mixed quantum states have the relationship $Q_{U}\geq 2Q_{E}$. In this paper, we show that, however, if $m>2$, the relationship $Q_{U}\geq 2Q_{E}$ may not hold again in general, and there may be no supremum of $Q_{U}/Q_{E}$ for more than two states, which may also reflect an essential difference between discrimination for two-states and multi-states. (4) A number of examples are constructed.

arXiv:0812.2378•Dec 12, 2008•2 citations
We present the conditions under which probabilistic error-free discrimination of mixed states is possible, and provide upper and lower bounds on the maximum probability of success for the case of two mixed states. We solve certain special cases exactly, and demonstrate how the problems of state filtering and state comparison can be recast as problems of mixed state unambiguous discrimination.
Based on our previous publication [U. Herzog and J. A. Bergou, Phys.Rev. A 71, 050301(R) (2005)] we investigate the optimum measurement for the unambiguous discrimination of two mixed quantum states that occur with given prior probabilities. Unambiguous discrimination of nonorthogonal states is possible in a probabilistic way, at the expense of a nonzero probability of inconclusive results, where the measurement fails. Along with a discussion of the general problem, we give an example illustrating our method of solution. We also provide general inequalities for the minimum achievable failure probability and discuss in more detail the necessary conditions that must be fulfilled when its absolute lower bound, proportional to the fidelity of the states, can be reached.
Based on our previous publication [U. Herzog and J. A. Bergou, Phys. Rev. A 71 , 050301(R)(2005)] we investigate the optimum measurement for the unambiguous discrimination of two mixed quantum states that occur with given prior probabilities. Unambiguous discrimination of nonorthogonal states is possible in a probabilistic way, at the expense of a nonzero probability of inconclusive results, where the measurement fails. Along with a discussion of the general problem, we give an example illustrating our method of solution. We also provide general inequalities for the minimum achievable failure probability and discuss in more detail the necessary conditions that must be fulfilled when its absolute lower bound, proportional to the fidelity of the states, can be reached.
Recently the problem of unambiguous state discrimination of mixed quantum states has attracted much attention. So far, bounds on the optimum success probability have been derived [T. Rudolph, R. W. Spekkens, and P. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. A 68, 010301(R) (2003)]. For two mixed states they are given in terms of the fidelity. Here we give tighter bounds as well as necessary and sufficient conditions for two mixed states to reach these bounds. Moreover we construct the corresponding optimal measurement strategies. With this result, we provide analytical solutions for unambiguous discrimination of a class of generic mixed states. This goes beyond known results which are all reducible to some pure state case. Additionally, we show that examples exist where the bounds cannot be reached.
Deterministic discrimination of nonorthogonal states is forbidden by quantum measurement theory. However, if we do not want to succeed all the time, i.e., allow for inconclusive outcomes to occur, then unambiguous discrimination becomes possible with a certain probability of success. A variant of the problem is set discrimination: the states are grouped in sets and we want to determine to which particular set a given pure input state belongs. We consider here the simplest case, termed quantum state filtering, when the NNN given nonorthogonal states ${\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{1}⟩,\dots{},\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{N}⟩}$ are divided into two sets and the first set consists of one state only while the second consists of all of the remaining states. We present the derivation of the optimal measurement strategy, in terms of a generalized measurement (positive-operator-valued measure), to distinguish $\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{1}⟩$ from the set ${\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{2}⟩,\dots{},\ensuremath{\mid}{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{N}⟩}$ and the corresponding optimal success and failure probabilities. The results, but not the complete derivation, were presented previously [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 25901 (2003)] as the emphasis there was on appplication of the results to probabilistic quantum algorithms. We also show that the problem is equivalent to the discrimination of a pure state and an arbitrary mixed state.
We propose a general description for the unambiguous discrimination of mixed states according to the system-environment coupling, and present a procedure to reduce this to a standard semidefinite programming problem. In the two-state case, we introduce the canonical vectors and partly simplify the problem to the case of discrimination between pairs of canonical vectors. By considering the positivity of the $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ matrices, we obtain a series of new upper bounds for the total success probability, which depends on both the prior probabilities and specific state structures.
The minimum-error probability of ambiguous discrimination for two quantum states is the well-known {\it Helstrom limit} presented in 1976. Since then, it has been thought of as an intractable problem to obtain the minimum-error probability for ambiguously discriminating arbitrary mmm quantum states. In this paper, we obtain a new lower bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination and compare this bound with six other bounds in the literature. Moreover, we show that the bound between ambiguous and unambiguous discrimination does not extend to ensembles of more than two states. Specifically, the main technical contributions are described as follows: (1) We derive a new lower bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination among arbitrary mmm mixed quantum states with given prior probabilities, and we present a necessary and sufficient condition to show that this lower bound is attainable. (2) We compare this new lower bound with six other bounds in the literature in detail, and, in some cases, this bound is optimal. (3) It is known that if m=2m=2m=2, the optimal inconclusive probability of unambiguous discrimination QUQ_{U}QU​ and the minimum-error probability of ambiguous discrimination QEQ_{E}QE​ between arbitrary given mmm mixed quantum states have the relationship QU≥2QEQ_{U}\geq 2Q_{E}QU​≥2QE​. In this paper, we show that, however, if m>2m>2m>2, the relationship QU≥2QEQ_{U}\geq 2Q_{E}QU​≥2QE​ may not hold again in general, and there may be no supremum of QU/QEQ_{U}/Q_{E}QU​/QE​ for more than two states, which may also reflect an essential difference between discrimination for two-states and multi-states. (4) A number of examples are constructed.