Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0302127 · Physical Review Letters

Comment on “Quantum Backreaction through the Bohmian Particle”

L. L. Salcedo

Published Mar 21, 2003• 18 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this Comment I point out some limitations of the proposal of Prezhdo and Brooksby for coupling quantum and classical degrees of freedom (Phys.Rev.Lett.86(2001)3215) if it is pushed too far.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.90.118901

Related papers

Comment on “Classical and Quantum Interaction of the Dipole”

Tomislav Ivezić

In this paper I have presented Comment on Anandan's paper (J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1354 (2000)) [hep-th/9910018].

arXiv:physics/0611010•Physical Review Letters•Mar 9, 2007•12 citations

Some Clarifications on the Relation Between Bohmian Quantum Potential and Mach’s Principle

Faramarz Rahmani, Mehdi Golshani

arXiv:1810.11840•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 8, 2017•5 citations

Comment on “Quantum Backreaction on `Classical' Variables”

K. R. W. Jones

A Comment on the Letter by Arlen Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 621 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 February 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4087©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 20, 1996•19 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Accurate ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at half filling’ ”

G. P. Zhang

We respond to Jeckelman's Comment on our paper [G. P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 68, 153101 (2003)], which discusses his previous work [E. Jeckelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 236401 (2002)]. We feel that it is important to point out that his previous results show a trend contradicting the weak-coupling limit, a conclusion that is independent of our calculation. Therefore, our comments on his previous results remain valid and our conclusion is unchanged.

Physical Review B•May 4, 2005•2 citations

Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Lidia Latanowicz, Eduard C. Reynhardt

Chemical Physics Letters•Nov 29, 2006•9 citations

Quantum Backreaction through the Bohmian Particle

Oleg V. Prezhdo, Craig Brooksby

A novel solution to the quantum backreaction problem in a mixed quantum-classical simulation is provided using the Bohmian interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Bohmian backreaction is unique, computationally simple, features reaction channel branching, and easily gives the full classical limit. The Bohmian quantum-classical method is illustrated by application to a model of O2 interacting with a Pt surface.

Physical Review Letters•Apr 9, 2001•153 citations