arXiv:quant-ph/0301067

A loophole in Cabello's proof to Bell's theorem without inequalities

W. LiMing, Z. L. Tang, Liao, C.

Published Jan 15, 2003• 0 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

Cabello proved Bell's theorem without using inequalities. A loophole of Cabello's proof is pointed out in this work.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0301067

Related papers

Detection inefficiencies in Cabello's proof of the three-qubit Bell theorem without inequalities

Li‐Yi Hsu, Jau-Han Chen

Physics Letters ANov 30, 20060 citations

Bell’s Theorem, Bell Inequalities, and the “Probability Normalization Loophole”

John F. Clauser

The frontiers collectionNov 15, 20166 citations

Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities and Beyond

Anton Zeilinger, Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael Horne

NATO ASI series. Series B : PhysicsJan 1, 19924 citations

Bell's Theorem Without Inequalities for Arbitrarily High-Dimensional Fermionic System

Changyong Chen, Xiaolong Zhang, Kelin Gao

A generalized proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities via the singlet state of two spin-(2 n +1)/2 fermionic particles for two observers is proposed. It is a direct and meaningful extension of that presented by A. Cabello [Phys. Rev. A67 (2003) 032107] and the proof from A. Cabello is included in our proof as a special example.

Communications in Theoretical PhysicsMay 1, 20050 citations

Bell＇s Theorem Without Inequalities for Arbitrarily High-Dimensional Fermionic System

CHENChang-Yong, ZHANGXiao-Long, GAOKe-Lin

A generalized proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities via the singlet state of two spin-(2n + 1)/2 fermionic particles for two observers is proposed. It is a direct and meaningful extension of that presented by A. Cabello [Phys. Rev. A67 (2003) 032107] and the proof from A. Cabello is included in our proof as a special example.

理论物理通讯：英文版Jan 1, 20050 citations

Bell's Inequality Refuted on Bell's Own Terms

Gordon Watson

Bell's famous inequality contradicts ours. But ours holds algebraically, experimentally, classically and quantum-mechanically: Bell's does not. So Bell's inequality is refuted on Bell's terms as we identify his naively-realistic error and correct it.

Jul 1, 20180 citations