Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0210198 · International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Nonlinear Reformulation of Heisenberg's Dynamics

Martin Ziegler, Benno Fuchssteiner

Published Jul 1, 2005• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10773-005-7048-9

Related papers

Fractal Phase-Space Uncertainty: A Logical-Spectral Reformulation of the Heisenberg Principle

Enrique Vidal Silvente

We develop a fractal-spectral reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle within a nonlinear phase-space framework motivated by the Quantum Fractal-Logical Unified Field architecture. Instead of working on the standard Hilbert space L 2 (R) with Lebesgue measure and linear position/momentum operators, we consider a fractal Hilbert space H F = L 2 (F, µ H) built on a Cantor-type metric-measure substrate with Hausdorff measure µ H and a self-adjoint fractal Hamiltonian. Within this setting we define effective position and momentum observables (X F , P F) adapted to the fractal geometry and derive a generalized uncertainty relation

•Mar 18, 2026•0 citations

Convergence of model Heisenberg dynamics

Е. В. Гусев

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1988•0 citations

Relative phase and dynamical phase sensing in a Hamiltonian model of the optical SU(1,1) interferometer

Tyler J. Volkoff

The SU(1,1) interferometer introduced by Yurke, McCall, Klauder is reformulated starting from the Hamiltonian of two identical optical downconversion processes with opposite pump phases. From the four optical modes, two are singled out up to a relative phase by the assumption of exact alignment of the interferometer (i.e., mode indistinguishability). The state of the two resulting modes is parametrized by the nonlinearity $g$, the relative phase $ϕ$, and a dynamical phase $θ$ resulting from the interaction time. The optimal operating point for sensing the relative phase (dynamical phase) is found to be $ϕ= π$ ($θ=0$) with quantum Fisher information exhibiting Heisenberg scaling $E^{2}$ (logarithmically modified Heisenberg scaling $\left({E\over \ln E}\right)^{2}$). Compared to the predictions of the circuit-based model, we find in that in the Hamiltonian model: 1. the optimal operating points occur for a non-vacuum state inside the interferometer, and 2. measurement of the total photon number operator does not provide an estimate of the relative or dynamical phase with precision that saturates the quantum Cramer-Rao bound, whereas an observable based on weighted shift operators becomes optimal as $g$ increases. The results indicate a first-principles approach for describing general optical quantum sensors containing multiple optical downconversion processes.

arXiv:2505.15635•May 21, 2025•0 citations

On the existence of a heisenberg dynamics

I. M. Burban

Ukrainian Mathematical Journal•Jan 1, 1974•0 citations

Koopman–von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics

Ilon Joseph

This paper shows how to use quantum computers to simulate nonlinear and non-Hamiltonian classical dynamics by using the Koopman-von Neumann approach, which reformulates the classical system as an equivalent Schrodinger equation with a Hermitian Hamiltonian and a unitary evolution operator on phase space.

arXiv:2003.09980•Physical Review Research•Oct 19, 2020•109 citations

Dynamics of the Classical Heisenberg Chain

Z. Slanič, Harvey Gould, Jan Tobochnik

Computers in Physics•Nov 1, 1991•3 citations
We develop a fractal-spectral reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle within a nonlinear phase-space framework motivated by the Quantum Fractal-Logical Unified Field architecture. Instead of working on the standard Hilbert space L 2 (R) with Lebesgue measure and linear position/momentum operators, we consider a fractal Hilbert space H F = L 2 (F, µ H) built on a Cantor-type metric-measure substrate with Hausdorff measure µ H and a self-adjoint fractal Hamiltonian. Within this setting we define effective position and momentum observables (X F , P F) adapted to the fractal geometry and derive a generalized uncertainty relation
The SU(1,1) interferometer introduced by Yurke, McCall, Klauder is reformulated starting from the Hamiltonian of two identical optical downconversion processes with opposite pump phases. From the four optical modes, two are singled out up to a relative phase by the assumption of exact alignment of the interferometer (i.e., mode indistinguishability). The state of the two resulting modes is parametrized by the nonlinearity ggg, the relative phase ϕϕϕ, and a dynamical phase θθθ resulting from the interaction time. The optimal operating point for sensing the relative phase (dynamical phase) is found to be ϕ=πϕ= πϕ=π (θ=0θ=0θ=0) with quantum Fisher information exhibiting Heisenberg scaling E2E^{2}E2 (logarithmically modified Heisenberg scaling (Eln⁡E)2\left({E\over \ln E}\right)^{2}(lnEE​)2). Compared to the predictions of the circuit-based model, we find in that in the Hamiltonian model: 1. the optimal operating points occur for a non-vacuum state inside the interferometer, and 2. measurement of the total photon number operator does not provide an estimate of the relative or dynamical phase with precision that saturates the quantum Cramer-Rao bound, whereas an observable based on weighted shift operators becomes optimal as ggg increases. The results indicate a first-principles approach for describing general optical quantum sensors containing multiple optical downconversion processes.