arXiv:quant-ph/0209089

Finite automata models of quantized systems: conceptual status and outlook

Karl Svozil

Published Sep 15, 2002• 0 citations

Abstract

Since Edward Moore, finite automata theory has been inspired by physics, in particular by quantum complementarity. We review automaton complementarity, reversible automata and the connections to generalized urn models. Recent developments in quantum information theory may have appropriate formalizations in the automaton context.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0209089

Related papers

Partition Logics, Finite Automata and Generalized Urn Models

Karl Svozil

Complementarity was first encountered in quantum mechanics. In what follows we shall present finite deterministic models featuring complementarity. The type of complementarity discussed in this chapter grew out of an attempt to understand quantum complementarity by some finite, deterministic, quasi-classical (automaton) model.

Fundamental theories of physicsJan 1, 20180 citations

Quantum automata and quantum computing

Marats Golovkins

Quantum finite automata were introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Crutchfield in [MC 97] and by A.Kondacs and J.Watrous in [KW 97]. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata, but rather a generalization of deterministic reversible (permutation) automata. In [AF 98] A.Ambainis and R.Freivalds raised the question what kind of probabilistic automata can be viewed as a special case of quantum finite automata. To answer that question and study relationship between quantum finite automata and probabilistic finite automata, we introduce a notion of probabilistic reversible automata (PRA, or doubly stochastic automata). We give the necessary condition for a language to be recognized by PRA. We find that there is a strong relationship between different possible models of PRA and corresponding models of quantum finite automata. In these thesis we regard quantum automata, probabilistic reversible and deterministic reversible automata as reversible automata. At least two non-equivalent definitions of language recognition are used for one-way reversible finite automata in various papers. Both of these definitions have their own advantages and disadvantages, summarized in our classification of one-way reversible automata. Further, we introduce a notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite multitape automaton but not by deterministic finite multitape automata. Additionally we discover unexpected probabilistic automata recognizing complicated languages. Finally, we revise the concept of quantum pushdown automata (QPA), first introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Cruthchfield in [MC 97]. We give the definition of QPA in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by using the definition of quantum finite automata of [KW 97]. It is established that the unitary criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the corresponding unitary criteria of quantum Turing machines [BV 97]. We show that QPA can recognize every regular language. We also present some simple non-context-free languages recognized by QPA (hence not recognizable by deterministic and nondeterministic pushdown automata).

Jan 1, 20020 citations

Computational Complementarity for Mealy Automata

Cristian S. Calude, Elena Calude, Cătălina Ştefănescu

In this paper we extend (and study) two computational complementary principles from Moore to Mealy automata which are finite machines possessing better “quantum-like” features. We conjecture that automata which are reversible according to Svozil do not satisfy any of these computational complementarity principles. This result is consistent with the embeddability of irreversible computations into reversible ones (via Bennett’s method, for example). Mathematica experiments confirmed this hypothesis.

Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer ScienceMay 1, 19985 citations

Chapter 8 Quantum computing in automata theory

G. Ignisha Rajathi, R. Vedhapriyavadhana, R. Niranjana +2 more

In the contemporary era we dwell in, every now and then, new technologies are developed by master brains such as researchers and scientists. This also paves the way to discover replacements to classical computers. One such progression among the great inventions is the essence of quantum computing. They are brought to light for the purpose of solving problems and scenarios solved by classical computers but in a more effective way and in the least span of time. The study of quantum computing focuses on finding new ways to compute by using quantum physics phenomena. A qubit, in contrast to a typical computer bit, can be either 0 or 1, or it can be a superposition of both 0 and 1. Quantum theory commemorates with automata theory, thereby formulating quantum finite automata. Quantum finite automaton, or basically a deterministic finite automaton, is one of the simplest models of computation, which is an input-driven model, which takes an input, and according to the input, we just read the machine, and it changes its state. This proves that any quantum finite automata are completely capable of recognizing languages like Tally with given cut point too. Such languages recognized by a cut point, by quantum finite automata, are called stochastic languages. It further collaborates with the chemical industry with its qubit power over molecular collide, interactive models, and collaborative string processing using nonregular languages.

De Gruyter eBooksAug 7, 20232 citations

Quantum reversibility and a new model of quantum automaton

Massimo Pica Ciamarra

This article is an attempt to generalize the classical theory of reversible computing, principally developed by Bennet [IBM J. Res. Develop., 17(1973)] and by Fredkin and Toffoli [Internat. J. Theoret. Phys., 21(1982)], to the quantum case. This is a fundamental step towards the construction of a quantum computer because a time efficient quantum computation is a reversible physical process. The paper is organized as follows. The first section reviews the classical theory of reversible computing. In the second section it is showed that the designs used in the classical framework to decrease the consumption of space cannot be generalized to the quantum case; it is also suggested that quantum computing is generally more demanding of space than classical computing. In the last section a new model of fully quantum and reversible automaton is proposed. The computational power of this automaton is at least equal to that of classical automata. Some conclusion are drawn in the last section.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102104Feb 21, 20010 citations

Quantum finite automata: survey, status and research directions

Amandeep Singh Bhatia, Ajay Kumar

Quantum computing is concerned with computer technology based on the principles of quantum mechanics, with operations performed at the quantum level. Quantum computational models make it possible to analyze the resources required for computations. Quantum automata can be classified thusly: quantum finite automata, quantum sequential machine, quantum pushdown automata, quantum Turing machine and orthomodular lattice-valued automata. These models are useful for determining the expressive power and boundaries of various computational features. In light of the current state of quantum computation theory research, a systematic review of the literature seems timely. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive and systematic analysis of quantum finite automata models, quantum finite automata models with density operators and quantum finite automata models with classical states, interactive proof systems, quantum communication complexity and query complexity as described in the literature. The statistics of quantum finite automata related papers are shown and open problems are identified for more advanced research. The current status of quantum automata theory is distributed into various categories. This research work also highlights the previous research, current status and future directions of quantum automata models.

arXiv:1901.07992Jan 23, 20199 citations