Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0207073

How photon detectors remove vacuum fluctuations

Emilio Santos

Published Jul 12, 2002• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The main argument against the reality of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum fluctuations is that they do not activate photon detectors. In order to met this objection I propose a model of photocounting which, in the simple case of a light signal with constant intensity, predicts a counting rate proportional to the intensity, in agreement with the standard quantum result.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0207073

Related papers

A classical model for a photodetector in the presence of electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations

Trevor W. Marshall, Emilio Santos

The main argument against the reality of the electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations is that they do not activate photon detectors. In order to meet this objection we propose a classical model of a photodetector which, in the simple case of a light signal with constant intensity, gives a counting rate which is a non-linear function of the intensity. For sufficiently large signal intensity, the counting rate is proportional to the intensity, in agreement with the standard quantum results, but there is a dark rate when the signal intensity is low.

arXiv:0707.2137•Jul 14, 2007•0 citations

Can quantum vacuum fluctuations be considered real?

Emilio Santos

The main argument against the assumption that quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field are real is that they do not activate photon detectors. In order to met this objection I study several models of photon counter compatible with the reality of the fluctuations. The models predict a nonlinear dependence of the counting rate with the light intensity and the existence of a nonthermal dark rate, results which might explain the difficulty for performing loophole-free optical tests of Bell's inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0206161•Jun 22, 2002•2 citations

Engineering quantum jump superoperators for single-photon detectors

Alexandre V. Dodonov, Salomon Sylvain Mizrahi, V. V. Dodonov

We study the back action of a single-photon detector on the electromagnetic field upon a photodetection by considering a microscopic model in which the detector is constituted of a sensor and an amplification mechanism. Using the quantum trajectories approach we determine the quantum jump superoperator (QJS) that describes the action of the detector on the field state immediately after the photocount. The resulting QJS consists of two parts: the bright-count term, representing the real photoabsorptions, and the dark-count term, representing the amplification of intrinsic excitations inside the detector. First we compare our results for the counting rates to experimental data, showing good agreement. Then we point out that by modifying the field frequency one can engineer the form of the QJS, obtaining the QJS's proposed previously in an ad hoc manner.

arXiv:quant-ph/0601037•Physical Review A•Sep 29, 2006•16 citations

Spectral and Correlation Properties of Two-Photon Light

Maria V. Chekhova

Although light quanta were known since the works by Planck and Einstein, for several decades after these works, there was no need to treat light quantum mechanically, and all experiments could be well explained using the quantum description of matter and classical description of light (the semiclassical approach). The situation changed with the development of sources of so-called nonclassical light, i.e., light whose properties cannot be understood in the framework of the semiclassical approach. Two simple examples can be given here. The first one is the suppression of shot noise in optical detectors. Shot noise, i.e., fluctuations of photocurrent scaling as the square root of the photocurrent mean value, can be, in principle, attributed to the discrete nature of the charge generated by the detector. At the same time, the effect of shot-noise suppression, which is observed with certain light sources (squeezed light) is clearly related to the statistics of light, and quantum mechanics is completely necessary for its description. Another example, which brings us closer to the subject of the present paper, is two-photon light. This type of light contains only pairs of photons (often called biphotons), and hence, a pair of properly aligned photon-counting detectors registering two-photon light, in an ideal case, will produce only simultaneous photocounts. This behavior, again, can only be explained in terms of a quantum-mechanical description for the light.

SPIE eBooks•Mar 16, 2010•0 citations

Photons are fluctuations of a random (zeropoint) radiation filling the whole space

Emilio Santos

I assume that everywhere in space there is a real random electromagnetic radiation, or zeropoint field (ZPF), which looks similar for all inertial observers, so that the stochastic properties of the field should be Lorentz invariant. This fixes the spectrum except for a single adjustable parameter measuring the scale, which is identified with Planck's constant, so making the ZPF identical to the quantum electromagnetic vacuum. Photons are just fluctuations of the random field or, equivalently, wavepackets in the form of needles of radiation superimposed to the ZPF. Two photons are "classically correlated" if the correlation involves just the intensity above the average energy of the ZPF, but they are "entangled" if the ZP fields in the neighbourhood of the photons are also correlated. These assumptions may explain all quantum optical phenomena involving radiation and macroscopic bodies, provided the latter may be treated as classical. That is, we have an interpretation of quantization for light but not for matter. Detection of photons involves subtracting the ZPF, which cannot be made without a fundamental uncertainty. This explains why photon counters cannot be manufactured with 100% efficiency and no noise (dark rate), which prevents the violation of a genuine Bell inequality (this is the so-called detection loophole). The theory thus obtained agrees very closely with standard quantum optics if this is formulated in the Wigner representation.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 1, 2005•6 citations

Correlations in Light from a Laser at Threshold

Ren Fang Chang, Victor Korenman, C. O. Alley +1 more

In this study, we measured the temporal correlations in the electromagnetic field radiated by a laser in the threshold region of oscillation, from $\frac{1}{10}$ to 10 times threshold intensity. The experimental results are compared with theoretical predictions based on solutions of a Fokker-Planck equation. We stabilized the intensity of a He-Ne cw gas laser by means of a long-time-constant servo system which controlled the cavity length. Using a fast photomultiplier as detector, we recorded the photoelectron count distribution within a short counting time (3 \ensuremath{\mu}sec) while the photomultiplier was exposed to the laser light. From the photoelectron count distribution measurement, we calculated second, third, and fourth normalized cumulants of the intensity probability density function of the light field. The normalized cumulant is a measure of "pure" correlations among photons because the contributions from lower-order correlations are removed. The statistics of the photoelectron count distribution shows that the intensity fluctuations at about $\frac{1}{10}$ threshold are nearly those of a Gaussian field, and continuously approach those of a constant-amplitude field as the intensity is raised to about 10 times threshold. The normalized second, third, and fourth cumulants of the intensity probability density function of the laser light were also measured at 17 and 42% of threshold intensity as the counting time was increased from 3 to 1000 \ensuremath{\mu}sec. The results agree with predictions computed under the assumption that the dependence of the correlation functions on the time variables is the same as for Gaussian light.

Physical Review•Feb 10, 1969•79 citations
The main argument against the reality of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum fluctuations is that they do not activate photon detectors. In order to met this objection I propose a model of photocounting which, in the simple case of a light signal with constant intensity, predicts a counting rate proportional to the intensity, in agreement with the standard quantum result.
The main argument against the reality of the electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations is that they do not activate photon detectors. In order to meet this objection we propose a classical model of a photodetector which, in the simple case of a light signal with constant intensity, gives a counting rate which is a non-linear function of the intensity. For sufficiently large signal intensity, the counting rate is proportional to the intensity, in agreement with the standard quantum results, but there is a dark rate when the signal intensity is low.
The main argument against the assumption that quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field are real is that they do not activate photon detectors. In order to met this objection I study several models of photon counter compatible with the reality of the fluctuations. The models predict a nonlinear dependence of the counting rate with the light intensity and the existence of a nonthermal dark rate, results which might explain the difficulty for performing loophole-free optical tests of Bell's inequality.
We study the back action of a single-photon detector on the electromagnetic field upon a photodetection by considering a microscopic model in which the detector is constituted of a sensor and an amplification mechanism. Using the quantum trajectories approach we determine the quantum jump superoperator (QJS) that describes the action of the detector on the field state immediately after the photocount. The resulting QJS consists of two parts: the bright-count term, representing the real photoabsorptions, and the dark-count term, representing the amplification of intrinsic excitations inside the detector. First we compare our results for the counting rates to experimental data, showing good agreement. Then we point out that by modifying the field frequency one can engineer the form of the QJS, obtaining the QJS's proposed previously in an ad hoc manner.
Although light quanta were known since the works by Planck and Einstein, for several decades after these works, there was no need to treat light quantum mechanically, and all experiments could be well explained using the quantum description of matter and classical description of light (the semiclassical approach). The situation changed with the development of sources of so-called nonclassical light, i.e., light whose properties cannot be understood in the framework of the semiclassical approach. Two simple examples can be given here. The first one is the suppression of shot noise in optical detectors. Shot noise, i.e., fluctuations of photocurrent scaling as the square root of the photocurrent mean value, can be, in principle, attributed to the discrete nature of the charge generated by the detector. At the same time, the effect of shot-noise suppression, which is observed with certain light sources (squeezed light) is clearly related to the statistics of light, and quantum mechanics is completely necessary for its description. Another example, which brings us closer to the subject of the present paper, is two-photon light. This type of light contains only pairs of photons (often called biphotons), and hence, a pair of properly aligned photon-counting detectors registering two-photon light, in an ideal case, will produce only simultaneous photocounts. This behavior, again, can only be explained in terms of a quantum-mechanical description for the light.
I assume that everywhere in space there is a real random electromagnetic radiation, or zeropoint field (ZPF), which looks similar for all inertial observers, so that the stochastic properties of the field should be Lorentz invariant. This fixes the spectrum except for a single adjustable parameter measuring the scale, which is identified with Planck's constant, so making the ZPF identical to the quantum electromagnetic vacuum. Photons are just fluctuations of the random field or, equivalently, wavepackets in the form of needles of radiation superimposed to the ZPF. Two photons are "classically correlated" if the correlation involves just the intensity above the average energy of the ZPF, but they are "entangled" if the ZP fields in the neighbourhood of the photons are also correlated. These assumptions may explain all quantum optical phenomena involving radiation and macroscopic bodies, provided the latter may be treated as classical. That is, we have an interpretation of quantization for light but not for matter. Detection of photons involves subtracting the ZPF, which cannot be made without a fundamental uncertainty. This explains why photon counters cannot be manufactured with 100% efficiency and no noise (dark rate), which prevents the violation of a genuine Bell inequality (this is the so-called detection loophole). The theory thus obtained agrees very closely with standard quantum optics if this is formulated in the Wigner representation.
In this study, we measured the temporal correlations in the electromagnetic field radiated by a laser in the threshold region of oscillation, from 110\frac{1}{10}101​ to 10 times threshold intensity. The experimental results are compared with theoretical predictions based on solutions of a Fokker-Planck equation. We stabilized the intensity of a He-Ne cw gas laser by means of a long-time-constant servo system which controlled the cavity length. Using a fast photomultiplier as detector, we recorded the photoelectron count distribution within a short counting time (3 \ensuremath{\mu}sec) while the photomultiplier was exposed to the laser light. From the photoelectron count distribution measurement, we calculated second, third, and fourth normalized cumulants of the intensity probability density function of the light field. The normalized cumulant is a measure of "pure" correlations among photons because the contributions from lower-order correlations are removed. The statistics of the photoelectron count distribution shows that the intensity fluctuations at about 110\frac{1}{10}101​ threshold are nearly those of a Gaussian field, and continuously approach those of a constant-amplitude field as the intensity is raised to about 10 times threshold. The normalized second, third, and fourth cumulants of the intensity probability density function of the laser light were also measured at 17 and 42% of threshold intensity as the counting time was increased from 3 to 1000 \ensuremath{\mu}sec. The results agree with predictions computed under the assumption that the dependence of the correlation functions on the time variables is the same as for Gaussian light.