Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0111116 · Physical Review A

Geometric picture of entanglement and Bell inequalities

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Heide Narnhofer, Walter E Thirring

Published Sep 27, 2002• 153 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We work in the real Hilbert space ${\mathcal{H}}_{s}$ of Hermitian Hilbert-Schmidt operators and show that the entanglement witness which shows the maximal violation of a generalized Bell inequality (GBI) is a tangent functional to the convex set $S\ensuremath{\subset}{\mathcal{H}}_{s}$ of separable states. This violation equals the Euclidean distance in ${\mathcal{H}}_{s}$ of the entangled state to S and thus entanglement, GBI, and tangent functional are only different aspects of the same geometric picture. This is explicitly illustrated in the example of two spins, where also a comparison with familiar Bell inequalities is presented.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.66.032319

Related papers

Optimal entanglement witnesses for qubits and qutrits

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Katharina Durstberger-Rennhofer, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr +1 more

We study the connection between the Hilbert-Schmidt measure of entanglement (that is the minimal distance of an entangled state to the set of separable states) and entanglement witness in terms of a generalized Bell inequality which distinguishes between entangled and separable states. A method for checking the nearest separable state to a given entangled one is presented. We illustrate the general results by considering isotropic states, in particular two-qubit and two-qutrit states---and their generalizations to arbitrary dimensions---where we calculate the optimal entanglement witnesses explicitly.

arXiv:quant-ph/0508043•Physical Review A•Nov 28, 2005•74 citations

A geometric comparison of entanglement and quantum nonlocality in discrete systems

Christoph Spengler, Marcus Huber, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr

We compare entanglement with quantum nonlocality employing a geometric structure of the state space of bipartite qudits. The central object is a regular simplex spanned by generalized Bell states. The Collins–Gisin–Linden–Massar–Popescu–Bell inequality is used to reveal states of this set that cannot be described by local-realistic theories. Optimal measurement settings necessary to ascertain nonlocality are determined by means of a recently proposed parameterization of the unitary group combined with robust numerical methods. The main results of this paper are descriptive geometric illustrations of the state space that emphasize the difference between entanglement and quantum nonlocality. Namely, it is found that the shape of the boundaries of separability and Bell inequality violation are essentially different. Moreover, it is also shown that for mixtures of states sharing the same amount of entanglement, Bell inequality violations and entanglement measures are non-monotonically related.

arXiv:0907.0998•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 12, 2011•18 citations

Optimization of Bell operators and visualization of the CGLMP-Bell inequality

Christoph Spengler, Marcus Huber, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr

We compare entanglement with quantum nonlocality employing a geometric structure of the state space of bipartite qudits. Central object is a regular simplex spanned by generalized Bell states. The Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu-Bell inequality is used to reveal states of this set that cannot be described by local-realistic theories. Optimal measurement settings necessary to ascertain nonlocality are determined by means of a recently proposed parameterization of the unitary group U(d) combined with robust numerical methods. The main results of this paper are descriptive geometric illustrations of the state space that emphasize the difference between entanglement and quantum nonlocality. Namely, it is found that the shape of the boundaries of separability and Bell inequality violation are essentially different. Moreover, it is shown that also for mixtures of states sharing the same amount of entanglement, Bell inequality violations and entanglement measures are non-monotonically related.

•Jul 6, 2009•0 citations

Bounds on quantum correlations in Bell-inequality experiments

Yeong-Cherng Liang, Andrew C. Doherty

Bell-inequality violation is one of the most widely known manifestations of entanglement in quantum mechanics; indicating that experiments on physically separated quantum mechanical systems cannot be given a local realistic description. However, despite the importance of Bell inequalities, it is not known in general how to determine whether a given entangled state will violate a Bell inequality. This is because one can choose to make many different measurements on a quantum system to test any given Bell inequality and the optimization over measurements is a high-dimensional variational problem. In order to better understand this problem we present algorithms that provide, for a given quantum state and Bell inequality, both a lower bound and an upper bound on the maximal violation of the inequality. In many cases these bounds determine measurements that would demonstrate violation of the Bell inequality or provide a bound that rules out the possibility of a violation. Both bounds apply techniques from convex optimization and the methodology for creating upper bounds allows them to be systematically improved. Examples are given to illustrate how these algorithms can be used to conclude definitively if some quantum states violate a given Bell inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0608128•Physical Review A•Apr 9, 2007•59 citations

Bell inequalities and entanglement

Reinhard F. Werner, Michael M. Wolf

We discuss general Bell inequalities for bipartite and multipartite systems, emphasizing the connection with convex geometry on the mathematical side, and the communication aspects on the physical side. Known results on families of generalized Bell inequalities are summarized. We investigate maximal violations of Bell inequalities as well as states not violating (certain) Bell inequalities. Finally, we discuss the relation between Bell inequality violations and entanglement properties currently discussed in quantum information theory.

•Oct 1, 2001•213 citations

Bell inequalities and Entanglement

Reinhard F. Werner, Michael M. Wolf

We discuss general Bell inequalities for bipartite and multipartite systems, emphasizing the connection with convex geometry on the mathematical side, and the communication aspects on the physical side. Known results on families of generalized Bell inequalities are summarized. We investigate maximal violations of Bell inequalities as well as states not violating (certain) Bell inequalities. Finally, we discuss the relation between Bell inequality violations and entanglement properties currently discussed in quantum information theory.

arXiv:quant-ph/0107093•Jul 18, 2001•0 citations
We work in the real Hilbert space Hs{\mathcal{H}}_{s}Hs​ of Hermitian Hilbert-Schmidt operators and show that the entanglement witness which shows the maximal violation of a generalized Bell inequality (GBI) is a tangent functional to the convex set S\ensuremath⊂HsS\ensuremath{\subset}{\mathcal{H}}_{s}S\ensuremath⊂Hs​ of separable states. This violation equals the Euclidean distance in Hs{\mathcal{H}}_{s}Hs​ of the entangled state to S and thus entanglement, GBI, and tangent functional are only different aspects of the same geometric picture. This is explicitly illustrated in the example of two spins, where also a comparison with familiar Bell inequalities is presented.
We study the connection between the Hilbert-Schmidt measure of entanglement (that is the minimal distance of an entangled state to the set of separable states) and entanglement witness in terms of a generalized Bell inequality which distinguishes between entangled and separable states. A method for checking the nearest separable state to a given entangled one is presented. We illustrate the general results by considering isotropic states, in particular two-qubit and two-qutrit states---and their generalizations to arbitrary dimensions---where we calculate the optimal entanglement witnesses explicitly.
We compare entanglement with quantum nonlocality employing a geometric structure of the state space of bipartite qudits. The central object is a regular simplex spanned by generalized Bell states. The Collins–Gisin–Linden–Massar–Popescu–Bell inequality is used to reveal states of this set that cannot be described by local-realistic theories. Optimal measurement settings necessary to ascertain nonlocality are determined by means of a recently proposed parameterization of the unitary group combined with robust numerical methods. The main results of this paper are descriptive geometric illustrations of the state space that emphasize the difference between entanglement and quantum nonlocality. Namely, it is found that the shape of the boundaries of separability and Bell inequality violation are essentially different. Moreover, it is also shown that for mixtures of states sharing the same amount of entanglement, Bell inequality violations and entanglement measures are non-monotonically related.
We compare entanglement with quantum nonlocality employing a geometric structure of the state space of bipartite qudits. Central object is a regular simplex spanned by generalized Bell states. The Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu-Bell inequality is used to reveal states of this set that cannot be described by local-realistic theories. Optimal measurement settings necessary to ascertain nonlocality are determined by means of a recently proposed parameterization of the unitary group U(d) combined with robust numerical methods. The main results of this paper are descriptive geometric illustrations of the state space that emphasize the difference between entanglement and quantum nonlocality. Namely, it is found that the shape of the boundaries of separability and Bell inequality violation are essentially different. Moreover, it is shown that also for mixtures of states sharing the same amount of entanglement, Bell inequality violations and entanglement measures are non-monotonically related.
Bell-inequality violation is one of the most widely known manifestations of entanglement in quantum mechanics; indicating that experiments on physically separated quantum mechanical systems cannot be given a local realistic description. However, despite the importance of Bell inequalities, it is not known in general how to determine whether a given entangled state will violate a Bell inequality. This is because one can choose to make many different measurements on a quantum system to test any given Bell inequality and the optimization over measurements is a high-dimensional variational problem. In order to better understand this problem we present algorithms that provide, for a given quantum state and Bell inequality, both a lower bound and an upper bound on the maximal violation of the inequality. In many cases these bounds determine measurements that would demonstrate violation of the Bell inequality or provide a bound that rules out the possibility of a violation. Both bounds apply techniques from convex optimization and the methodology for creating upper bounds allows them to be systematically improved. Examples are given to illustrate how these algorithms can be used to conclude definitively if some quantum states violate a given Bell inequality.
We discuss general Bell inequalities for bipartite and multipartite systems, emphasizing the connection with convex geometry on the mathematical side, and the communication aspects on the physical side. Known results on families of generalized Bell inequalities are summarized. We investigate maximal violations of Bell inequalities as well as states not violating (certain) Bell inequalities. Finally, we discuss the relation between Bell inequality violations and entanglement properties currently discussed in quantum information theory.
We discuss general Bell inequalities for bipartite and multipartite systems, emphasizing the connection with convex geometry on the mathematical side, and the communication aspects on the physical side. Known results on families of generalized Bell inequalities are summarized. We investigate maximal violations of Bell inequalities as well as states not violating (certain) Bell inequalities. Finally, we discuss the relation between Bell inequality violations and entanglement properties currently discussed in quantum information theory.