Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0111077

Universal quantum computation with two- and three-qubit projective measurements

Stephen Fenner, Yong Zhang

Published Nov 13, 2001• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a finite set of projective measurements that, together with quantum memory and preparation of the |0> state, suffice for universal quantum computation. This extends work of Nielsen [quant-ph/0108020], who proposed a scheme in which an arbitrary unitary operation on n qubits can be simulated using only projective measurements on at most 2n qubits. All measurements in our set involve two qubits, except two measurements which involve three qubits. Thus we improve by one the upper bound, implied by Nielsen's results, on the maximum number of qubits needed to participate in any single measurement to achieve universal quantum computation. Each of our measurements is two-valued, and each can be expressed mathematically as a Boolean combination of single-qubit measurements.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0111077

Related papers

Two-qubit Projective Measurements are Universal for Quantum Computation

Debbie Leung

Nielsen [quant-ph/0108020] showed that universal quantum computation is possible given quantum memory and the ability to perform projective measurements on up to 4-qubits. We describe an improved method that requires only 2-qubit measurements, which are both sufficient and necessary. We present a method to partially collapse the $C_k$-hierarchy in the indirect construction of unitary gates [Gottesman and Chuang, Nature, {\bf 402} 309 (1999)], and apply the method to find discrete universal sets of 2-qubit measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0111122•Nov 23, 2001•41 citations

QUANTUM COMPUTATION BY MEASUREMENTS

Debbie Leung

We first consider various methods for the indirect implementation of unitary gates. We apply these methods to rederive the universality of 4-qubit measurements based on a scheme much simpler than Nielsen's original construction [quant-ph/0108020]. Then, we prove the universality of simple discrete sets of 2-qubit measurements, again using a scheme simplifying the initial construction [quant-ph/0111122]. Finally, we show how to use a single 4-qubit measurement to achieve universal quantum computation, and outline a proof for the universality of almost all maximally entangling 4-qubit measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0310189•International Journal of Quantum Information•Mar 1, 2004•121 citations

Qubit vs Observable Resource Trade-Offs in Measurement-Based Quantum Computation

Simon Perdrix

Since quantum measurement is universal for quantum computation (Nielsen [3]), the minimization of the resources required for measurement‐based quantum computation is a crucial point ([3, 1, 4, 5, 6]). We have shown in [6] that a set of observables composed of one two‐qubit measurement and three one‐qubit measurements form a universal set for quantum computation if one ancillary qubit is available as an additional resource. This set is minimal in terms of two‐qubit measurements, because at least one multi‐qubit operation is needed to create entanglement, and is also minimal in terms of ancillary qubits, because at least one ancillary qubit is required to simulate reversible transformations with projective measurements only. We discuss in this paper the required number of one‐qubit measurements for a set of observables to be universal. A set composed of one two‐qubit measurement and only two one‐qubit measurements is proved universal, at the cost of a second ancillary qubit. Thus an additional ancillary qubit seems to be required to obtain a smaller universal set of measurements. One may conclude to a trade off between ancillary qubits and observables in measurement‐based quantum computation.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

STATE TRANSFER INSTEAD OF TELEPORTATION IN MEASUREMENT-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTATION

Simon Perdrix

Quantum measurement is universal for quantum computation. The model of quantum computation introduced by Nielsen and further developed by Leung relies on a generalized form of teleportation. In order to simulate any n-qubit unitary transformation with this model, four auxiliary qubits are required. Moreover Leung exhibited a universal family of observables composed of one one-qubit measurement and four two-qubit measurements. We introduce a model of quantum computation via measurements only, relying on state transfer: state transfer only retains the part of teleportation which is necessary for computation. In order to simulate any n-qubit unitary transformation with this new model, only one auxiliary qubit is required. Moreover we exhibit a universal family of observables composed of three one-qubit measurements and only one two-qubit measurement. This model improves those of Nielsen and Leung in terms of both the number of auxiliary qubits and the number of two-qubit measurements required for quantum universality. In both cases, the minimal amounts of necessary resources are now reached: one auxiliary qubit (because measurement is destructive) and one two-qubit measurement (for creating entanglement).

arXiv:quant-ph/0402204•International Journal of Quantum Information•Dec 16, 2004•63 citations

Unifying Quantum Computation with Projective Measurements only and One-Way Quantum Computation

Philippe Jorrand, Perdrix, S

Abstract. Quantum measurement is universal for quantum computation (Nielsen [4], Raussendorf [7,8]). Two models for performing measurement-based quantum computation exist: the one-way quantum computer was introduced by Briegel and Raussendorf [7], and quantum computation via projective measurements only by Nielsen [4]. The more recent development of this second model is based on state transfers [6] instead of teleportation. From this development, a finite but approximate quantum universal family of observables is exhibited, which includes only one two-qubit observable, while others are one-qubit observables [6]. In this article, an infinite but exact quantum universal family of observables is proposed, including also only one two-qubit observable. The rest of the paper is dedicated to compare these two models of measurement-based quantum computation, i.e. one-way quantum computation and quantum computation via projective measurements only. From this comparison, which was initiated by Cirac and Verstraete [9], closer and more natural connections appear between these two models. These close connections lead to a unified view of measurement-based quantum computation. 1

•Jan 1, 2004•29 citations

SIMPLE SETS OF MEASUREMENTS FOR UNIVERSAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION AND GRAPH STATE PREPARATION

Yasuhiro Takahashi

We consider the problem of minimizing resources required for universal quantum computation using only projective measurements. The resources we focus on are observables, which describe projective measurements, and ancillary qubits. We show that the set of observables {Z ⊗ X, ( cos θ)X + ( sin θ)Y all θ ∈ [0, 2π)} with one ancillary qubit is universal for quantum computation. The set is simpler than a previous one in the sense that one-qubit projective measurements described by the observables in the set are ones only in the (X, Y) plane of the Bloch sphere. The proof of the universality immediately implies a simple set of observables that is approximately universal for quantum computation. Moreover, the proof implies a simple set of observables for preparing graph states efficiently.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Sep 1, 2010•2 citations
We present a finite set of projective measurements that, together with quantum memory and preparation of the |0> state, suffice for universal quantum computation. This extends work of Nielsen [quant-ph/0108020], who proposed a scheme in which an arbitrary unitary operation on n qubits can be simulated using only projective measurements on at most 2n qubits. All measurements in our set involve two qubits, except two measurements which involve three qubits. Thus we improve by one the upper bound, implied by Nielsen's results, on the maximum number of qubits needed to participate in any single measurement to achieve universal quantum computation. Each of our measurements is two-valued, and each can be expressed mathematically as a Boolean combination of single-qubit measurements.
Nielsen [quant-ph/0108020] showed that universal quantum computation is possible given quantum memory and the ability to perform projective measurements on up to 4-qubits. We describe an improved method that requires only 2-qubit measurements, which are both sufficient and necessary. We present a method to partially collapse the CkC_kCk​-hierarchy in the indirect construction of unitary gates [Gottesman and Chuang, Nature, {\bf 402} 309 (1999)], and apply the method to find discrete universal sets of 2-qubit measurements.
We first consider various methods for the indirect implementation of unitary gates. We apply these methods to rederive the universality of 4-qubit measurements based on a scheme much simpler than Nielsen's original construction [quant-ph/0108020]. Then, we prove the universality of simple discrete sets of 2-qubit measurements, again using a scheme simplifying the initial construction [quant-ph/0111122]. Finally, we show how to use a single 4-qubit measurement to achieve universal quantum computation, and outline a proof for the universality of almost all maximally entangling 4-qubit measurements.
Since quantum measurement is universal for quantum computation (Nielsen [3]), the minimization of the resources required for measurement‐based quantum computation is a crucial point ([3, 1, 4, 5, 6]). We have shown in [6] that a set of observables composed of one two‐qubit measurement and three one‐qubit measurements form a universal set for quantum computation if one ancillary qubit is available as an additional resource. This set is minimal in terms of two‐qubit measurements, because at least one multi‐qubit operation is needed to create entanglement, and is also minimal in terms of ancillary qubits, because at least one ancillary qubit is required to simulate reversible transformations with projective measurements only. We discuss in this paper the required number of one‐qubit measurements for a set of observables to be universal. A set composed of one two‐qubit measurement and only two one‐qubit measurements is proved universal, at the cost of a second ancillary qubit. Thus an additional ancillary qubit seems to be required to obtain a smaller universal set of measurements. One may conclude to a trade off between ancillary qubits and observables in measurement‐based quantum computation.
Quantum measurement is universal for quantum computation. The model of quantum computation introduced by Nielsen and further developed by Leung relies on a generalized form of teleportation. In order to simulate any n-qubit unitary transformation with this model, four auxiliary qubits are required. Moreover Leung exhibited a universal family of observables composed of one one-qubit measurement and four two-qubit measurements. We introduce a model of quantum computation via measurements only, relying on state transfer: state transfer only retains the part of teleportation which is necessary for computation. In order to simulate any n-qubit unitary transformation with this new model, only one auxiliary qubit is required. Moreover we exhibit a universal family of observables composed of three one-qubit measurements and only one two-qubit measurement. This model improves those of Nielsen and Leung in terms of both the number of auxiliary qubits and the number of two-qubit measurements required for quantum universality. In both cases, the minimal amounts of necessary resources are now reached: one auxiliary qubit (because measurement is destructive) and one two-qubit measurement (for creating entanglement).
Abstract. Quantum measurement is universal for quantum computation (Nielsen [4], Raussendorf [7,8]). Two models for performing measurement-based quantum computation exist: the one-way quantum computer was introduced by Briegel and Raussendorf [7], and quantum computation via projective measurements only by Nielsen [4]. The more recent development of this second model is based on state transfers [6] instead of teleportation. From this development, a finite but approximate quantum universal family of observables is exhibited, which includes only one two-qubit observable, while others are one-qubit observables [6]. In this article, an infinite but exact quantum universal family of observables is proposed, including also only one two-qubit observable. The rest of the paper is dedicated to compare these two models of measurement-based quantum computation, i.e. one-way quantum computation and quantum computation via projective measurements only. From this comparison, which was initiated by Cirac and Verstraete [9], closer and more natural connections appear between these two models. These close connections lead to a unified view of measurement-based quantum computation. 1
We consider the problem of minimizing resources required for universal quantum computation using only projective measurements. The resources we focus on are observables, which describe projective measurements, and ancillary qubits. We show that the set of observables {Z ⊗ X, ( cos θ)X + ( sin θ)Y all θ ∈ [0, 2π)} with one ancillary qubit is universal for quantum computation. The set is simpler than a previous one in the sense that one-qubit projective measurements described by the observables in the set are ones only in the (X, Y) plane of the Bloch sphere. The proof of the universality immediately implies a simple set of observables that is approximately universal for quantum computation. Moreover, the proof implies a simple set of observables for preparing graph states efficiently.