Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0110170 · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Photon number conservation and photon interference

Mátyás Koniorczyk, József Janszky

Published Jul 23, 2002• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The group theoretical aspect of the description of passive lossless optical four-ports (beam splitters) is revisited. It is shown through an example, that this approach can be useful in understanding interferometric schemes where a low number of photons interfere. The formalism is extended to passive lossless optical six-ports, their SU(3)-theory is outlined.

DOI
10.1117/12.475872

Related papers

A quantum description of the beam splitter

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

The unitary operator representing the action of a linear lossless passive beam splitter is presented. The derivation is based on an elementary group-theoretical approach that allows us to understand this action in terms of the Stokes operators for the incident beam. This operator is used to illustrate with some examples the coupling of noise in the beam splitter.

Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Apr 1, 1995•68 citations

Quantum-mechanical lossless beam splitter: SU(2) symmetry and photon statistics

Richard A. Campos, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin Carl Teich

For optical homodyning, the matrix representation of a lossless beam splitter belongs to the SU(2) group of unimodular second-order unitary matrices. The connection between this group and the rotation group in three dimensions permits the field density operators at the input and output ports of the beam splitter to be related by means of well-known angular-momentum transformations. This, in turn, provides the joint output photon-number distribution, which may be written as a Fourier series in the relative phase shift imparted by the beam splitter, for a general joint state at its inputs. The series collapses to a single term if one of the input fields is diagonal in the number-state representation. If the inputs to both ports are further restricted to be pure number states, the joint, as well as the marginal photon-number distributions, turn out to be directly proportional to the square of Jacobi polynomials in the beam-splitter transmittance. These photon-number probabilities are invariant to a set of physical and time-reversal symmetries. When one of the input photon-number states is the vacuum, the beam splitter simply deletes photons from the other port in Bernoulli fashion, as if they were classical particles. The output photon number is then described by the binomial distribution. If the inputs at the two ports are different number states, neither of which is the vacuum, the photon-number distribution is expressible in terms of summed and weighted products of the results for photomixing with the vacuum. If the inputs at the two ports are identical number states, and a beam splitter of transmittance \ensuremath{\tau}=(1/2 is used, the photon-number distribution assumes a simple but interesting form. It vanishes for odd photon numbers, indicating that the photons assemble in pairs at each output port. Finally, it is shown that homodyning quantum fluctuations can be reduced by using a balanced photomixer for arbitrary input states.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1989•633 citations

Fourth-order interference of joint single-photon wave packets in lossless optical systems

Richard A. Campos, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin Carl Teich

We examine the fourth-order interference properties of two photons at a lossless four-port optical device. The photon pair is represented by a joint single-photon wave-packet state with arbitrary spectral composition. We explicitly determine the coincidence probabilities at the output ports of a beam splitter and a Mach-Zehnder interferometer when the incident wave packet is described by a joint Gaussian spectral distribution and the two photons are incident one at each port of the device. For uncorrelated and distinguishable input photons, the fourth-order interference is readily understood in terms of the particle or wave behavior of each photon acting separately. On the other hand, highly correlated photon pairs, such as those generated from spontaneous parametric down-conversion, exhibit fourth-order interference effects at the output of the interferometer that depend expressly on the joint nature of the photon-pair wave packet, and cannot be described by the particle or wave behavior of either photon.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1990•95 citations

Bunching of Photons When Two Beams Pass Through a a Beam Splitter

Kirk T. McDonald, L.J. Wang

Dirac has written "Each photon then interferes only with itself. Interference between two different photons never occurs." Indeed, a practical definition is that "classical" optics consists of phenomena due to the interference of photons only with themselves. However, photons obey Bose statistics which implies a ``nonclassical'' tendency for them to ``bunch''. For a simple example of nonclassical optical behavior, we consider two pulses of photons of a single frequency that are simultaneously incident on two sides of a lossless, 50:50 beam splitter.

arXiv:quant-ph/0312032•Dec 3, 2003•2 citations

The Quantum Regime Operation of Beam Splitters and Interference Filters

Andre Vatarescu

The quantum Rayleigh spontaneous emission replaces entangled photons with independent ones in homogeneous dielectric media where single photons cannot propagate in a straight line. Single and independent groups of photons, described by the original bare states of Jaynes-Cummings model, deliver the correct expectation values for the number of photons carried by a photonic wavefront, its complex optical field, and phase quadratures. The intrinsic longitudinal field profile associated with a photonic wavefront is derived for any instantaneous number of photons. These photonic properties enable a step-by-step analysis of various beam splitters and interferometric filters. As a result, generalized expressions are derived for the correlation functions characterizing counting of coincident numbers of photons for fourth-order interference, whether classical or quantum optical, without entangled photons.

•Sep 17, 2019•9 citations

Probing the quantum-classical boundary with optical beam splitters

Filippo Giovanni Ghiglieno, Marcello Ferreira, Olavo Leopoldino da Silva Filho +2 more

This study explores how optical beam splitters provide a conceptual and operational link between classical and quantum descriptions of light. In the classical picture, they are modeled through energy-conserving field amplitudes and a four-port scattering matrix, which successfully explain interference in systems such as Michelson and Mach–Zehnder interferometers. Moving to the quantum domain, the field amplitudes are replaced by bosonic creation and annihilation operators that obey the Weyl–Heisenberg algebra. Using the Glauber displacement operator, we define coherent states whose expectation values reproduce classical monochromatic fields while exhibiting Poissonian photon statistics. This unified approach shows that beam splitters diagnose the nature of incident light: coherent states yield classical interference, while indistinguishable single-photons reveal quantum signatures such as antibunching and Hong–Ou–Mandel interference. The analysis relies on operator formalism and correlation functions that capture both average-field behavior and nonclassical statistics. As beam-splitting technologies transition from bulk optics to integrated photonics and metasurfaces, this framework offers a consistent basis for modeling optical circuits across the classical-quantum divide. By highlighting the dual role of the beam splitter as a passive device and a quantum probe, we emphasize its importance for quantum optics, quantum information, and hybrid photonic platforms.

Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
The group theoretical aspect of the description of passive lossless optical four-ports (beam splitters) is revisited. It is shown through an example, that this approach can be useful in understanding interferometric schemes where a low number of photons interfere. The formalism is extended to passive lossless optical six-ports, their SU(3)-theory is outlined.
For optical homodyning, the matrix representation of a lossless beam splitter belongs to the SU(2) group of unimodular second-order unitary matrices. The connection between this group and the rotation group in three dimensions permits the field density operators at the input and output ports of the beam splitter to be related by means of well-known angular-momentum transformations. This, in turn, provides the joint output photon-number distribution, which may be written as a Fourier series in the relative phase shift imparted by the beam splitter, for a general joint state at its inputs. The series collapses to a single term if one of the input fields is diagonal in the number-state representation. If the inputs to both ports are further restricted to be pure number states, the joint, as well as the marginal photon-number distributions, turn out to be directly proportional to the square of Jacobi polynomials in the beam-splitter transmittance. These photon-number probabilities are invariant to a set of physical and time-reversal symmetries. When one of the input photon-number states is the vacuum, the beam splitter simply deletes photons from the other port in Bernoulli fashion, as if they were classical particles. The output photon number is then described by the binomial distribution. If the inputs at the two ports are different number states, neither of which is the vacuum, the photon-number distribution is expressible in terms of summed and weighted products of the results for photomixing with the vacuum. If the inputs at the two ports are identical number states, and a beam splitter of transmittance \ensuremath{\tau}=(1/2 is used, the photon-number distribution assumes a simple but interesting form. It vanishes for odd photon numbers, indicating that the photons assemble in pairs at each output port. Finally, it is shown that homodyning quantum fluctuations can be reduced by using a balanced photomixer for arbitrary input states.
We examine the fourth-order interference properties of two photons at a lossless four-port optical device. The photon pair is represented by a joint single-photon wave-packet state with arbitrary spectral composition. We explicitly determine the coincidence probabilities at the output ports of a beam splitter and a Mach-Zehnder interferometer when the incident wave packet is described by a joint Gaussian spectral distribution and the two photons are incident one at each port of the device. For uncorrelated and distinguishable input photons, the fourth-order interference is readily understood in terms of the particle or wave behavior of each photon acting separately. On the other hand, highly correlated photon pairs, such as those generated from spontaneous parametric down-conversion, exhibit fourth-order interference effects at the output of the interferometer that depend expressly on the joint nature of the photon-pair wave packet, and cannot be described by the particle or wave behavior of either photon.
Dirac has written "Each photon then interferes only with itself. Interference between two different photons never occurs." Indeed, a practical definition is that "classical" optics consists of phenomena due to the interference of photons only with themselves. However, photons obey Bose statistics which implies a ``nonclassical'' tendency for them to ``bunch''. For a simple example of nonclassical optical behavior, we consider two pulses of photons of a single frequency that are simultaneously incident on two sides of a lossless, 50:50 beam splitter.
The quantum Rayleigh spontaneous emission replaces entangled photons with independent ones in homogeneous dielectric media where single photons cannot propagate in a straight line. Single and independent groups of photons, described by the original bare states of Jaynes-Cummings model, deliver the correct expectation values for the number of photons carried by a photonic wavefront, its complex optical field, and phase quadratures. The intrinsic longitudinal field profile associated with a photonic wavefront is derived for any instantaneous number of photons. These photonic properties enable a step-by-step analysis of various beam splitters and interferometric filters. As a result, generalized expressions are derived for the correlation functions characterizing counting of coincident numbers of photons for fourth-order interference, whether classical or quantum optical, without entangled photons.
This study explores how optical beam splitters provide a conceptual and operational link between classical and quantum descriptions of light. In the classical picture, they are modeled through energy-conserving field amplitudes and a four-port scattering matrix, which successfully explain interference in systems such as Michelson and Mach–Zehnder interferometers. Moving to the quantum domain, the field amplitudes are replaced by bosonic creation and annihilation operators that obey the Weyl–Heisenberg algebra. Using the Glauber displacement operator, we define coherent states whose expectation values reproduce classical monochromatic fields while exhibiting Poissonian photon statistics. This unified approach shows that beam splitters diagnose the nature of incident light: coherent states yield classical interference, while indistinguishable single-photons reveal quantum signatures such as antibunching and Hong–Ou–Mandel interference. The analysis relies on operator formalism and correlation functions that capture both average-field behavior and nonclassical statistics. As beam-splitting technologies transition from bulk optics to integrated photonics and metasurfaces, this framework offers a consistent basis for modeling optical circuits across the classical-quantum divide. By highlighting the dual role of the beam splitter as a passive device and a quantum probe, we emphasize its importance for quantum optics, quantum information, and hybrid photonic platforms.